The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
I think you are doomed actually laloser, doomed to lost every cent on this positin because you can’t accept when you have called it wrong, and instead think that if you throw enough money at it, that it must surely come good.
Classic.
They haven’t held their gains at all.
In fact anyone having invested in either consistently since listing would be sat on a signifiant net loss.
So no, they haven’t held their gains.
They have both had short term rises usually off the back of mugs buying for a punt, or getting over excited with some waffle, but inevitably just ending up sat on an under water position.
Contrarian view but the accurate one.
now printing, I would say it looks like something being forward sold if I had to guess.
Oh how jolly.
In fact, looks like quite a lot of dumping going on today.
I smell a rat.
It’s not rising for good reason.
Watch and learn.
Sorry if you don’t like my contrarian opinion, though I’m fairly sure there’s a load of stale bulls here waiting to dump their stock on unsuspecting mugs, now I wonder who they could be.
Oh and of course you never see a pump ahead of a fundraise do you.
Never ever.
Guffaw.
funding all this? Placing ahoy.
And of course, you don’t seem to have taken into consideration how they intend to pay for any of these sites/projects. Seems Close Bros haven’t provided an update regarding their DD since that was announced over a year ago. Strange that..
Given I accurately predicted the fall from the IPO price and the blip over the last few days is on very low volume trading only, I think you are being a little naive if you think that chum. It will be back below 2p over the next few sessions, just wait and see.
I find it hilarious how frothy you get when your investment shows the slightest hint of blue, even if that’s on low volume and no real substance - have you not realise yet that these short “blips” are not going for sentiment or longer term gains, as when the share price inevitably slips back down lower, mugs who are locked in sell at a loss and become disgruntled.
Only until the few twerps who rushed in today realise 1) that Mast has got to dilute their holding by raising cash to pay for the latest acquisitions 2) that the high tariff realised in August won't last when the market is reorganised to cut the link with gas prices 3) That even at August's high prices, a 32% gross margin is disappointing. 4) They can't solve his problems by distress selling even part of his 'stake' ! Keep on dreaming !
Wrong again?
Get your calculator out and plug those numbers into it, I think you will find that they do not “add up”.
And of course how much of those revenues is actually paying off the debt contained within the SPVs?
Mugs.
Oh and MAST 52 week range 12.12p all the way down to 2.02p and now treading water in the threes.
Bet the initial investors are pleased as punch with their investment.
PMSL.
It’s a little concerning when in a RNS they can’t even get their figures right, it does make you wonder how many other times they have got their math wrong.
“For August 2022 alone (the "Month"):
-- Electricity Generation Sales Revenue for the Month - c. GBP314,000;
-- Total Electricity Generation Output for the Month - c. 1,420 MWh;
-- Average Electricity Generation Sales Price achieved per MWh sold for the Month - c. GBP619”
Wouldn’t last long on Dragons Den.
It’s been close to news, shovel ready, moving ahead at speed etc for years and years. It’s just sound bites and lip service. The price will drift as it has done before until the next bit of dross emerges for pumpers to ramp.
looks like the rugs been pulled.
Marginally Dave0 which means that it was likely than not a transfer rather than two consecutive buys as you have stated.
Laguna - grow up.
No Dave0, not so.
You are clearly new to this game Dave0 and are making yourself look incredibly foolish and naive with comment such as that.
Probably better posting that on the MAST board then.
Strange how those two “buys” didn’t move the price at all.
One would suggest it’s because they were transfers and not buys.
But that wouldn’t suit your narrative, would it.
But I don’t have agenda to dissuade investment so that’s a blatant lie on your part, having an opinion that’s the polar opposite to yours is simply that, an opinion. You are the one dressing it up as something which it is not.
You refuse to discuss anything about the co on a discussion board created for that purpose, and instead seem to want to play inane games and call other posters names.
I haven’t once posted with the header “sell” or “strong sell” and your only counter to the red flags and concerns raised is to spout the same “non holding agenda poster” rhetoric and add a header of “strong buy” despite being unable to back that view up with any argument of substance.
As for “meanwhile significant multiple holders add” how many times have you posted that same phrase on this very board?
Either they are blindly adding (possible) and watching their investment erode, or you are just simply making things up.
Personally I think you know deep down this is a busted flush but can’t help yourself.
Yes, you are.