Member Info for PartyPooper

earache Would that be big enough to take this long? To pull in UBS & DLAP?
It seems unlikely to me unless WK is turning out to be a much bigger asset that we thought it was.

If you match the Amazon price and sell 2 million, that will be £240k in month 1, it's a start I guess.

https://academic.oup.com/occmed/article/70/8/556/5956367
The UK ENT community had early warnings from colleagues abroad and altered their clinical guidelines beyond AGPs to recommend FFP3 for all nose and throat examinations [13]. ENT then had an early consultant death. All other UK surgical specialties followed [25].

Analysis of 119 HCW deaths in UK [26] found no mortality in staff afforded FFP3 protection in ‘high risk’ intensive care and anaesthetics settings. The reported HCW COVID-19 deaths were working in locations classified as ‘low risk’ including general practice, ambulance staff, care home workers, general wards and emergency departments, where PPE policy provides FRSM. Young women working in the NHS have twice the risk of death from COVID-19 compared to their general population counterparts [26]. There have now been 247 HCW deaths reported in the UK

High risk procedures will continue to use FFP3 Mr Cave, health workers lives are not an expendable set of lab rats to test your masks on!

OK - Waiting on those Performance tests compared to normal IIRC, if they only perform the same they worth the same, approx 15p to 20p.
Good to support a micro mom n pop business!

donutpanic they'll be discounted fairly quickly, first person that wears one and inhales a nice waft of virus through the gaps around the edge and gets ill with covid will show these up as being equivalent to colloidal silver or CBD bubble gum.

When will RMS announce what the "other performance tests" will be and when will they publish them?
I'm looking forward to those.
Kaino I'd wuv a bacon butty but got to stick to the muesli after Chwistmas binge, petrol tank nearly full.
Those performance tests could convince even doubting Thomas's like me, looking forward to those.

"Pound a MASK minimum"
Hahahahahaha, nice one , very funny

Certificates not enough, RNS states other performance tests need to be carried out for the much vaunted large order. Those performance tests will reveal there is no added value to these masks and they will not fetch any premium over standard 15p masks.

Put it in PAT, PAT is the new EUA

These masks are useless, they take 7 hours to kill 90% of the virus, most are tossed after an hour, they'll still have most of what was on the surface still there. What is inhaled through the gaps around the edge will not be acted on by the AV layer, they will not offer any advantages over a normal mask. Performance tests not done or published, can't wait for that RNS LOL

"5 Ply a game changer'
Lol - PSML

@Judge Have you been watching Black Adder episodes lately? Channeling your inner Edmond there :-)

Expect nothing but, I judged this one on the product and what is being put out by the BOD and Cave himself.
They are sticking to the story that 5 ply IIRC are going to be used in high risk situations in a healthcare environment, never going to happen, the NHS have strict guidelines.
No mention of when the 'performance tests" are taking place to ensure the big order (not actually that big anyway) goes through.
All you guys chat about is what TB is up to.

tuna Just examples where everything they put out is vague, misleading or factually incorrect. The performance tests, if rigorous, will be where this all falls apart.

One was patented 11 years ago!

Where's my link Gilders?

Gilders So molecules containing the virus on the outside layer of the mask are completely neutralised are they? Direct me to the testing of that, if it's the case that it doesn't then the masks will have to be disposed of exactly the same way. Also, masks are not designed to trap the virus, IIRC were designed to stop large molecules being dispersed and landing on a patient, that's it, nothing more, nobody has ever claimed that they catch small particles or even trap bacteria. Pick up a used mask shake it about and you will aerosolise what was sitting on the mask. The AV layer is going to be at least two layers away from one of the outside layers so where's the peer reviewed papers stating the length of time it takes and to what proportion it kills virus on the outside layer?
Stop saying things you can't support with evidence!

@nathdomb I just got up :-)

As a new investor to this, with so few shares in issue, dilution would be something I'd expect but not be worried about if it was appropriate. This seems such a quiet BB considering the prospects here.

Can't polish a ****