Member Info for parkez

I have not changed my mind...

I am hoping it is correct.

If its correct I will be happy to be wrong.

Hope that's correct.

If so might even get a blue day tomorrow 🤔

Really wobbler.

A party pays their own costs upfront.

There's a judgement and then it's claimed back from the losing party...

I don't know whether to laugh at you or pity you!

When it comes to who pays for these fees, the usual rule is that each party is liable for their own. The “American Rule,” implemented in the United States, is founded on the premise that each party bears the cost of their own legal fees

Until the judgement.

Okay Wobbler...whatever you say.

Time will tell.

On correction of the inventors mistake Capxx will have a case against Maxwell?

Debatable...

Remember the Jury ruled NONE of Maxwells products infringed capxx patents.

How confident are Capxx that they are correct and are able to convince the relevant Judge/Jury next time around having failed this time?

So wobbler is an investor that never thinks of the "negative stuff"...

Must be nice to live in his/ her (or whatever he wants to be known as) world.

Who pays court costs in America?

In the civil context, court costs are normally awarded to the prevailing party, meaning that the 'losing' party must cover them. Rule 54(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows exceptions to this general rule via statute or court order.

Https://www.claims.co.uk/knowledge-base/civil-court/pay-court-costs

Wrong again wobbler.

It's called reality...

That's all irrelevant if they have to raise $4M @ 0.3/4.

Let's hope not, but be in denial if you wish but it's a possibility.

Looking at the jury declaration it appears that the jury considered none of the alleged products infringed capx patents.Even if the patents were valid. ( making an appeal less likely?)

So why did they sue Maxwell.

Either Capx know nothing about supercaps or the jury don't.

Payment of costs is at the judges discretion...

Numerous factors influencing his decision.

If capx get away with no costs....Monday might not be that bad a day.

But thats a big if.

No it's a form for the Jury to declare their unanimous determinations.

Can confirm,

Upon a patent becoming invalid the licensee can cease to pay royalties...but has no claim to claim back whats been paid.

Wow what a crybaby.

Remember reading a while back that licencing payments cannot be refunded or claimed back if

at a later point they are proved to be invalid.

But that's just memory.

Presuming cpx now have to pay court costs...

$4m ?

Will cpx actually open for trading Monday or suspending depending on the ability to raise funds.

They are " better comments" because these comments give you a little hope you have not lost everything.

They are no better than any other comment posted on here.

EXCEPT on the basis they make you feel better.

A comment pulling a company to pieces with an educated response of 10 comments defending it is imo a " good" comment.

Each to their own.

The research done this morning, if done prior to this judgement might have altered some people's investment decisions.

Why do company chat boards not discuss other scenarios besides those that they want?

Thanks to those that have taken time and trouble to try and explain what's happened.

Tesla imo will now withdraw from suing Cap-xx.

It has nothing to gain by doing so.