Member Info for parkez

Oh ye of little faith.

Tomorrow's trading ...if you are using this as an indicator should be more revealing....imo.

Dec 5th 2024 GM Q&As.

It's was asked why no revenue forecast for FY2025?

Answer was the company was going through a transformational period and expecting enhanced revenue. In the interest of accuracy they did not forecast.

With the CFO also present in the forthcoming presentation.....is more news coming besides results?

Cap-xx are doing the manufacturing for Schurter currently.

But as yet we have no link between the SMT and Schurter.

The question is....if it turns out these cobranded products include the SMT....do Cap-xx alone have the capacity?

SMT is to be produced inhouse....

Is a MOA to formed.

Makes sense with a cobranded product....

SMT not to be licenced out and produced "in house".

Do Cap-xx have the production capacity envisaged?

Can Schurter or will Schurter ever be considered in house?

Logic says Schurter will be involved somewhere...but not seen any confirmation.

I've not seen anything to link the SMT and Schurter?

Are we just taking this for granted or have I missed something?

Thanks.

Https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=EP21220773&_cid=P21-M708Z3-97273-5

Notice the CMC binder!

This is the 2011 patent...the product that failed.

That was the referred to false dawn.

One minute it looked as though they'd cracked it....then just silence!

Hopefully not going to be a repeat!

I will add...this breakthrough has been enabled by the discovery of the new binder...

This to me is bigger news...

When you are dealing with mass volume this is a major breakthrough.

Sorry either site or phone playing up.

Lots of supercapacitors are classed as smd.

BUT they have to be manually soldered on. The Cap-xx breakthrough ( a worlds first after many years of trying and a false dawn).

Is they can be attached to the pcb and go through a reflow oven.

When you are d

These are no different to what Cap-xx are currently selling.

Says soldering method ...manual.

The dimensions are not 0.40mm thickness.

No brand name

More to come....imo

These are no different to what Cap-xx ar

Https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://cmccellulose.com/understanding-cmc-binders-a-comprehensive-guide-for-lithium-battery-manufacturers/&ved=2ahUKEwie7bae5LaLAxXrTUEAHbmOACgQFnoECDoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0EqTvogZj1kHpmyute3MGI

This is currently the state of art binder....

But for how much longer?

Mcap if the Cap-xx binder replaces it?

I asked the question "would they be licensing the binder tech"?

This was not answered. A statement prior to Q&A stated certain questions could not be answered due to being price sensitive or confidential....

i,m taking it this falls into that category....

Vanilla,

no not in the Telegram group.

I thought this subject would have been discussed on there by now.

im hoping the investor seminar at the end of the month will give more details on these patents....but imo the fact its enabled SMT to be developed suggests its something special.

SMT....this is itself potentially massive....not to replace batteries but capacitors.

600+in the average top end phone....if you could replace with 10 supercaps, why would you not!

Taken from the patent regarding the new binder system...the new binder that enables Cap-xx to produce the SMT (After many many years of R&D)

The PSS is Cap-xx and the CMC is the most used binder currently.

These figures look impressive to me.

Can be used in batteries....remarks of scalability coming from Cap-xx.

The NEW DMH going to Schurter imo has this binder, and its environmental qualities are the attraction to Dr Cooley.

SO who else could benefit from this????

" The ESR and capacitance of the supercapacitor was tested by regular discharge measurements (see Figs. 1 and 2). As evidenced by these data, the ESR rise is much slower using PSS as a binder compared to using CMC, and the capacitance is lost more slowly. The PSS capacitors performed better after 600 hours than the CMC capacitors performed at 50 hours."

" The PSS supercapacitor also show an improved frequency response for capacitance relative to the otherwise identical CMC supercapacitor (see Fig. 3). The PSS supercapacitor -45° phase transition occurred at around 1.1 Hz, compared to the comparable CMC transition at 0.5 Hz (see Fig. 4)."

"There was less gas generated in the cells for the supercapacitors that used PSS binders as judged by the lower force exerted on the load cell at 100 hours than the equivalent CMC capacitor at 10 hours."

Just another Tesla. Cap-xx coincidence?

Vanilla...

Yes it's no coincidence that there's been a dramatic change in optimism from the company since the patents.

Promotion for the inventor!

Tesla and the rumoured new solid state battery revealed this year.

Could it have the new binder from Cap-xx....

Do the research.....it's quite possible.

Legal cost exposure - the Company announced on 21 March 2024 that it had reached an agreement with Maxwell/Tesla to settle all outstanding matters related to the historic litigation by way of a series of payments that the Board considers are not material amounts in the context of CAP-XX;

Are we any the wiser on this settlement...has any payments been made? Should they show in accounts?

OR....is payment being made this year!

Just thoughts.

I wonder how it performs under low temperatures?