Member Info for parkez

me neither, no selling for me based on OS posts...had a little top up this morning and hes not responsible for that either!

it dosent matter to me who he is, what he is or who pays him.....all that matters to me is he makes me think and do some research...he puts questions inside my head. But for him/her to do that you have to be prepared to listen...experience has made me prepared to listen.

All i am saying is i welcome his posts, as i do everyones and am prepared to read , research and come to my own conclusion...if thats being niave then i am guilty as charged...

OK thats fine PS .....no problem, i can live with that.

No i,m serious....thank you OS keep up the good work. And PS believe it or not there are other views on here besides yours.

For all those that say do not engage with the "troll", i can only presume that so far you have not been on the receiving end of a companies deceiving shananigans. i have only been trading 5 years, consider myself still a novice and lots to learn. My first venture into trading resulted with a loss of �37k...a very expensive learning curve. one thing i did learn was not to dismiss other posters views, check them out and come to your own decisions....i was warned on many many occasions but i was stubborn and thought i was right. CEOS seem to have a licence to say,do,infer whatever they want with no reprecussions....and many do. For me its good that we have someone thats watching our backs...many may not see his posting that way but i do...i,m grateful that he makes me think that maybe everything is not as rosy as i am thinking. So thank you OS keep on posting and i,m hoping we will not be in a position to be thanking you again.

i was reading an article about a teardown yesterday...apparently its very similar to the S8.... we have no involvement.

OS when you are doing your calculations do not forget that a proportion of the Murata produced product is sold under the Cap-xx name and added to the Cap-xx bottom line. What proportion of Cap-xx sales are actually manufactered by Murata i am not sure.

"One thing is for sure is that in the last 5 years CPX has rec'd more from AVX than Murata. The largest slice of that has come from licensing fees. CPX teamed up with Murata years ago yet there was no mention of any licence fee, although I recall some agreement re a share of profits but have heard no comment about this recently. One assumes that at that time the technology was given away in terms of any licensing fee as perhaps CPX were simply happy to be associated with them . Who knows." Seems Cap-xx are very glad to be associated with Murata....along with being glad to receive the licencing fee. AK knows the value of his IP so does the market...he will not be giving anything away .

i realise that some pis do not have the time to do a lot of research so i do not apologise for posting what i think is relevant historic information regarding what i think could be future developments. Have a free day today...nothing to do so i thought i would look into the history of Cap-xx, going over old news can be very informative. Must admit though the general trend is" jam tomorrow", so many predictions,targets not met.... Headlines of... "busy times, we have a lot happening" "its been a great period with a lot of development"...the increase in staff and production facilities are all indicators of good things to come...maybe a little more patience is going to be needed but confident that they will achieve big things. In 2006 Cap-xx had a m/cap of �45.2m.....with no Murata licence deal, no AVX licence deal...no thinline, �45.2m based solely on Cap-xx ip!! heres a snippet of info for OS who if memory serves me right asked a question about upfront fees from Murata. "In March 2010, Murata and CAP-XX formally announced that they had entered into a collaborative Research & Development Agreement to investigate the production of a second generation supercapacitor which will have the capability to be "surface mounted" using reflow solder techniques. Although the agreement was signed in March 2010, the statement of works associated with the Agreement was commenced in September 2009. CAP-XX will receive consideration of A$1.43 million over four equal instalments with the first two instalments received during the 2009/10 financial year. The remaining instalments are due to be received in the 2010/11 financial year."

Taken from YE 2012, posted because it seems to show the smd was originally a Cap-xx/Murata development but now could be otherwise. "CAP-XX and Murata have deferred the surface mount device license negotiations as it is the Company's understanding that Murata is focusing its efforts on increasing sales of the supercapacitor products already in production. CAP-XX is in initial negotiations with several other manufacturers regarding licensing the surface mount technology."

https://www.murata.com/products/productdetail?partno=DMHA14R5V353M4ATA0 https://www.murata.com/en-eu/products/capacitor/edlc/dmh/benefit https://www.murata.com/en/products/productdata/8800373800990/MFCDSH1E.pdf?1504841403000 SO SO MANY APPLICATIONS.

So why did AK and PE decide to add this comment on the bottom of the interims? ";The short-term outlook is also pleasing with key customer meetings in Europe this month to add further clarity on the outlook for the second half and beyond " Bearing in mind the aggrevation they received after the failure of their predictions of in the last interims, why would they set themselves up to be shot at again...its a comment they could have just have easily omitted. ";key customer meetings"...meaning? numerous meetings with the one customer or one meeting with numerous customers? Therefore should we be expecting at least some kind of update to these meetings or is the board just giving its pis ammunition. With the addition of the comment by AVXS product marketing engineer regarding supercaps being intergrated into mobile phones, the first reference about surface mounted devices for over two years from Cap-xx and numerous very high volume licence agreements under negotiation, an explosive catalyst to the sp required for the extended share options to have been worth the time, trouble and expense of extending required, you just have to wonder just how good March COULD be for Cap-xx. Just my thoughts on a boring sunday morning.

Worth a read https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjF5rK3wdrYAhVIbVAKHTjUBecQFggsMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fasimms.co.uk%2Finsolvency-information%2Fcompany-striking-off&usg=AOvVaw2r30KsI3qMXHRpnsU5kUTh

ok its been a while since ive looked into here and totally wrote this off. The strike off action i believe is brought about by companies house, it was done also at the end of 2016 and discontinued meaning someone gave good reason for the administration process to continue, same again by companies house at end of 2017...Len and Mick are not loan note holders and they will not be creating the suspension, "Anyone who is owed money by the company can apply to Companies House to have the Striking off action suspended. A creditor may object on multiple occasions" strike off action means all MTVS assets go to the state.....creditors/ hmrc have brought.about the suspension. Share holders will recieve nothing.

Saw the app icon on the phone but didnt have time to see it working...he assures me he was watching BBC live on it... dont know what to make of it.

A mate collared me at work on friday and said he had just done a software update on his i phone.... and up popped a apple live tv app...live tv but over the internet....didnt we produce one of them and were selling it at a few quid? anyone with a iphone got similar?

Hi Kipper glad you find all this very funny...you cant put a price on laughter....so what ever you have lost here i,m sure it was money well spent. Dont think anyone has said that mtv/content express would be part of the ATSC 3.0 standard just that maybe they were in a position to take advantage of the new signal when available, ie a device that will receive the atsc3 0 signal and send it to mobile devices, if mtv had nothing of value then the administration process would have been completed by now, the creditors have sanctioned the extension, there as to be a reason for this. i am as benighted as the next person as to why.....but have not yet given up hope that we may see some sort of return. I for one have moved on...and for your info i,m grateful to MTV in a funny sort of way for all that i have learnt from being involved and invested. MY FIRST escapade into the world of shares. Thank you for your thoughts, they are always welcome and maybe one day will will all be laughing.

something is keeping mtv alive, something is keeping the creditors from taking whats available to them now. what that something is we can only guess......ATSC 3.0 and the possibilities is as good a guess as any. massive potential for mobile tv.....always as been just needed a reliable signal. keep thinking about the lptv stations and the effect ATSC 3.0 will have on them? Contant Express sounds very very similar to ATSC 3.0 to me, rather than spend large amounts on infastructure required for ATSC 3.0 will they license the tech from mtv for the delivery to mobiles? all very confusing with the knowledge thats available to us. what about siyaya tv...seems like things are happening? https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjJ6cKz373WAhXpD8AKHa9vAwsQFggmMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen-gb.facebook.com%2Fsiyayatv%2F&usg=AFQjCNF_y1erbqFyC6FGjFSOiIsE7Dx3GA

SOMEBODY will be taking advantage of this opportunity....hope its MTV and the manufacturers who licence our tech? "The ATSC 3.0 standard breaks from existing revisions because it needs new hardware to be implemented, either in the form of new TV chipsets or compatible receiver modules in mobile devices. To help increase the initial adoption rates, however, some industry leaders expect Chromecast-like dongles supporting ATSC 3.0 transmissions to be subsidized by broadcasters and sold to consumers at affordable retail prices." https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiR0bvhtLvWAhXrA8AKHSysB1UQFggxMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fudzilla.com%2Fnews%2F42571-how-atsc-3-0-will-change-the-mobile-tv-watching-experience&usg=AFQjCNGQYpfqChKwZ5xx5toLC-hnzkdZsQ