Member Info for parkez

And payment for this service was!
https://www.alexisdesign.co.uk/motive-television-identity

And a reminder
"The company’s Content Express solutions platform offers various services, including video on demand (VOD), catch-up television, tablet television, targeted advertising for VOD, mocast for 4g LTE, virtual channels, and Video2Go for digital terrestrial broadcasters, satellite, DTT, cable pay television platforms, and Internet OTT content providers. It also provides Tablet TV, a television service designed for tablets, which offers various services, such as auto and PVR recording, and VOD, as well as interactive social media services."

What is ATSC 3.0?
"It’s the next version of the broadcast standard for how local TV channels are distributed without needing to have a cable or satellite subscription. ATSC 3.0 is supposed to make it so that you could get these channels not only on a regular TV screen but on your phone, laptop, tablet and even your car."

"People buying devices equipped with ATSC 3.0, which is contingent on companies like Apple manufacturing them"

And of course maybe a reaction to this.
"During the fourth quarter of 2018, global iPhone sales hit 64.5 million units, earning Apple 15.8% market share during the period. That was down from 73.2 million unit sales and 17.9% market share during the fourth quarter of 2017, according to Gartner. Apple’s drop was the biggest decline of any major smartphone maker during the period."

Lets see but i feel like i,m 5 yrs old waiting for christmas....
All seems logical to me, BE WARNED i,m always wrong ...but i like guessing..

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/broadcasting-authority-awards-5-7m-in-funding-to-119-tv-and-radio-projects-1.3825885

Motive Television was granted €240,000 for Virgin Media One three-part documentary First Love,

Good evening.
Thanks Jjj. Let's hope it comes good for all of us....

On second thoughts, yes could be..and yes probably is.

No not imo.

I have a feeling i am playing catch up. The enthusiasm shown by some posters tends me to believe this is old news to them.
Patents are patents and many never come to fruition, we will have to wait and see just what Apple have developed on monday.Until then it is all conjecture.
However ...
snippets from certain reports available.
"The concept includes a “data store for storing and serving video content to subscribers” that the patent said, “may comprise one or more data stores, distributed storage, peer-to-peer based storage, cloud-based storage or otherwise.”
"it may also feature digital video recording capabilities that allow you to save your favorite shows for viewing at a later date."

And the best yet....
"The concept and its drawings – titled ‘TV sidebar user interface,’ – suggests Apple is designing a new Apple TV app that would merge content from various third-party subscription apps into one portal instead of consumers having to move or exit to another interface to watch say HBO Go, Netflix or Amazon Prime Video, as examples."
...Also known as "one stop shop"

Well i for one am feeling a little better having invested here, i was feeling as though i had been conned,duped and our Len had pulled a fast one....maybe he was a visionary but he just took a bigger bite than he could chew on the funds he had, whatever the 25th brings, the patents show Apple want to achieve just what Len & co started many years ago.
Of course that does not get me any of the £37k i lost on here!!

Good Morning all.

https://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/what-to-expect-from-apple-tv-streaming-service/

interesting
Apple is expected to build an infrastructure that will be capable of hosting everything. In theory, even the free over-the-air (OTA) local broadcasts could be captured. Using a massive collection of content servers — positioned strategically around the country — as its backbone,

A lot of what is written in this report sounds very familiar and you have to give MTV credit if no involvement for being ahead of the pack...even if they have maybe completely failed!!

Trying not to get too engrossed with all this because the fact remains MTV is in admin, as shaa stated this could be one large camouflage to develop this service.
What an ending to this little story this could be.

Ok please explain in simple terms for the less intelligent folk on here...cos I'm lost with it...MJFMSG.
Thanks.

Well dont hang about, get that money deposited and looking forward to seeing your top up...hurry up, news could drop any second!

The fact that you are not topping up NOW, suggests you are expecting one direction for this and happy for it to do so....
tut tut TT....after all you have said,

The timing of the launch of this service suggests some sort of ATSC 3.0 involvement.
But ATSC 3.0 is just that isnt it...takes the content available on the internet and sends it ota. Why would MTV develop something that to me is more or less the same as ATSC 3.0.
Confused about Apples new service.....surely not just another internet streaming service? If i remember correctly we never could quite figure about just what MTV were developing...as i said seems like a duplicate of ATSC 3.0...???

PERHAPS SOMEONE WITH A DEGREE COULD ENLIGHTEN US?...Would be much appreciated.

TDK royalties replacing AVX licence fee...reference i presume to the $65k Cap-xx received quarterly ...the loss of the full $750k will be felt in the full year accounts.

Haha charts,
only one thing that matters on AIM and thats sentiment.
You have it and it will rise, you do not and it will fall.
Seems a lot on here over complicating matters, just boredom and loss of faith on one hand and new buyers seeing a good price to enter on the other, its called a market.
Restore the faith and it will rise...but until !!

The reasons for the sustained drop are there for everyone to see, we should not be surprised by what is happening.
Just hope we soon have some reasons for a reversal...
Some good level headed posts over the last couple of days...board seems to have calmed down. Good.

A purchase by a director in the company he or she runs is a classic signal for investors.

"Directors can buy and sell shares in their own companies during periods when they are not aware of any information which the general public is not aware of which might cause the price to move. If they have such ‘insider information,’ they are not allowed to trade."

I would rather they not but shares....The "insider information" i hope they have is the reason for the lack of communication.

Example of wednesday post
"We can wake up tomorrow and get a red dot with the RNS of our dreams...on many different fronts, as someone once said it only takes a second to score a goal and change the whole game"

please find one that was disgusting showing my enjoyment?.

You do not get it do you,
i have no interest in the current daily share price, i do not trade this share...i am here long term.However i wish to learn about the company, the market and its workings.
The last share i invested heavily in was MTV ...I was a newbie, taken in by the rampers, the ceo...but worst of all i was my own worst enemy , i was oblivious to the truth because i thought i was correct, no amount of correction would dissuade me from my opinion that i was correct
You learn from your mistakes....
Why have i ramped or trolled this share today? ALL i have done is educate myself and maybe a few others, that is what the board is for....i wish to learn, just my way of doing so.

i asked earlier whether the Murata issue was classed as market sensitive/ information...
For something to be classed as ‘inside information’, it must:
be of a precise nature;
is not generally available;
relates (whether directly or indirectly) to investments traded on a UK regulated market (such as listed shares on the London Stock Exchange); and
be likely to have a significant effect on the price of the shares if it were generally available.
The information needs to be specific to the company and there needs to be some certainty to it. Imprecise information, and news that is generally applicable, is not announceable; nor are conclusions or facts that can be gleaned from research or analysis, because any investor (in theory) has access to the same material.
Price sensitivity is crucial to the definition of inside information. A company must ask: would a hypothetical ‘reasonable investor’, out to maximise their own economic self-interest, be likely to use the information in making their investment decision? Information that will usually be considered relevant to a reasonable investor’s decisions includes that affecting:

So conclusion is since this information is available to any investor who bothers to look it is not "insider info" and therefore not reportable.

So legally Cap-xx are within their rights not to notify the market or its investors...morally however is a different issue!

by southcbubble
"I expect many many more of the Inner Circle will start posting any day soon!"
Then we get the suspension of the voluntary strike off?

Thats a coincidence or a poster thats aware of something?

Waiting TT...
Come on i have a free day, we can debate the pros and cons of Cap-xx all day if you wish, go and get someone to hold your hand and tell you what to write if that makes you feel a little more confident.