hereandnow8 Jan 2016 12:02
Reckon you've got that right, there is a battle. Just looking at the timing again of the amendment on 30th July, although the official request for an EGM from 'Platinum Consulting Group, Anil Chintapalli and Corporate Computer Services' (Requisitioners') was not made until Sept, our Bod probably knew all about it.
So, they've put in these new clauses to fight the Requisitioners. They cannot prevent them from getting on the Board IMO but they can stop them making sweeping changes.
Worrying also though is the current possible defaults being discussed with Bondholders. These must be some things in 'small print' cause can't see where we've defaulted myself.