Member Info for Ozzy52

Ps, I don't know where that " i " came from, penguin, but while we're on the subject that also sums you up. i, i, i, that you.

Penguin, that's your opinion, and you're entitled to it, but it doesn't mean your opinion is correct, just the same as your "uber" negativity of UKOG .

Which whilst we are on the subject, undoubtedly goes to prove that you are the biggest naysayer i on this forum, with many many others clinging on to your tailfeathers.......touche!
I'm just an honest investor in UKOG...........and you?

NAYSAYERS ALWAYS ACTIVE

No Swizzy old boy, it's just for the benefit of others to let them know what you are.....but i do realise if they are regulars they know it already...oh and to remind you also because your memory seems muddled, especially when you are writing your memoirs....as there have been so many different versions.
P.s. You filtered me because I found you out and exposed you to the unaware.
HAPPY DAYS.

NAYSAYERS ALWAYS ACTIVE

Apart from the first two lines of your 12:14post the rest of that post undoutably refers to yourself.
Do you know what a hypocrite is?
Get a 1000 piece jigsaw of a penguin and a nice bottle of glenfiddich and you'll be just fine.
BREATHE. RELAX. or get your millions converted into pound coins and spend your time counting them.

All in everybody's opinion of course.

Well maybe the naysayers could fulfil your request mr cook as they seem to have plenty of spare time at the moment, and perhaps the ladies amongst them could give you a hand too.

NAYSAYERS ALWAYS ACTIVE

What a surprise, if Sando doesn't buy, they're out in force.....if he buys, they're out
in a bigger force.......come on naysayers make us "ave it" .

NAYSAYERS ALWAYS ACTIVE

Looks like Cynderliar 's trollbridge is in an underground sewer

It's great to be able to have personal opinions, rather than having to continually repeat stringent naysayer lines....mind you they probably enjoy the "whip" .

OOOH AAAAAGH NAYSAYAAA

All in my opinion of course

Oh I forgot to put, all in my opinion of course

Just googled it ....many headed snake.....in all seriousness.....very apt

Trollhunter2 , what was that about "the hydra" yesterday .....what did it mean?

Look to the right of the white flash......can you see the face of the avenging angel

Swizzy, declared at 21:05 that her last trade ( bought at 0.18p) was sold at 0.16p at a loss....... On the 30th of Dec Swizzy Abbott declared she was out of UKOG, at the time UKOG was at 0.125 and hadn't been anywhere near 0.16p for ages....make of that what you will......can't be a mistake from someone who is so clever?

Penguin, are you drunk, I said UKOG's words not mine, and they were making forward predictions, if/when they get permission for water injection.

Penguin, certainly, it simply says that with the cost cutting achieved so far they are saying that when they can start water injection they will "then" reduce the water disposal costs to a level where going forward they will then be able to extract oil from hh 1 at a profit, they then say they will then go on to drill HH3 and HH4 to "further" increase productivity........as previously planned.
UKOGS words not mine.
What don't you understand about that?
Not a lot of explaining, just unravelling your trickery by pointing out correct statements

ZYX 098, I have only repeated what was in the 15 jan 2021 rns, are you suggesting the rns was not accurate, you should know given your vocation. How do know if other posters are qualified to make their scientific predictions, do you know them personally, or do you just like what they say.
As i have only highlighted what UKOG have said how have i said anything untoward,
So please let us all know if UKOG's plans are wrong, being that you are a qualified oilman.
I await your reply

Penguin, I have only repeated what has already been said by yourself, others and UKOG, but i repeat it as it was said and meant.
In the jan 15 2021 rns all these issues are there for all to see, all addressed in sequence and all current issues covered,
Problem:- Hh2 z excessive water ingress, solution:- convert to reinjection well and replace with extra wells.kim/Portland
Problem:- increased water cut,solution:-reduce production to an economic balance until reinjection occurs.
Problem, balancing production of oil/water, see above.
all these things were covered in the rns, including increased flow rates and increased revenues when/if reinjection occurs.
Sandersons statement did not need to be intricate because all the issues were covered in the rns earlier.
What he did say was " once the re-injection is in place,to boost production and net revenues,we plan two more production wells.
I take that to read :- re-injection is to boost production and net revenues, and the extra wells are to replace HH2Z as mentioned earlier.
Not as you read it Penguin:- to boost production and net revenues we plan two more production wells.....I suggest people check out referrals to old RNS'S, because they are not always repeated accurately.....15 jan 2001 for reference

ZYX098. Well said sir, if it wasn't for people like you we wouldn't have the freedom we have now....look whats going on in Kazakhstan at the moment.......sir i salute you and all who have gone before you.....people have convenient short memories....God bless you, while we are still allowed to say that

And the last paragraph in your latest post proves exactly how silly you can be.

Penguin, by purposely missing out vital wordings and changing the meanings of statements therefore denying the existence of the true meanings you are in effect saying the true meanings dont exist, you think you are so clever in what you do but you're only fooling yourself.
You try to blind people with your warped diatribe which gets even more convoluted when you get exposed by trying to distract your accusers with your biased mixed up utterings......you're fooling no-one but yourself, must try harder chief naysayer