Member Info for Ozzy52

Hi Vetta, i too am disgusted in the comments made to Ocelot and I have been accused of being in association with him. It would be interesting to see your comments (in the capacity of your vocation) on the most recent accusations against him which in my opinion are designed to discredit him.
Now it seems to be my turn but that's no problem to me.

Some people think that denial absolves them from blame or trying to realign their meanings to disguise their true intentions.
I am also well invested in UKOG and am critical of the constant overzealous negativity.

Penguin,re:-My 11:39 post there was absolutely nothing wrong with the punctuation, commas ARE punctuation.

There was no reference to your post but there were references to other peoples comments and research (plural).

But if your inflated ego means you can't admit your obvious indiscretion so be it.

I hope my punctuation in this reply suits your high standards, oh and by the way there has been quite a lot of misspelling in your posts recently but not all of us are as picky as you.
My posting style is what it is..........nothing to do with my understanding of English

Who started the silliness...........you did

Penguin, how could i possibly be acknowledging your post when I was referring to your research.....no next time you read a post from me, read it with the full understanding of the English language......and read it as it was meant, not as you would like it to be.......old habits die hard.....it would have been nice if you had just accepted the compliment, perhaps it was too big a pill to swallow.....did you look up the definition of diligence?....it explains everything

Penguin, yes, how could you possibly have misunderstood my comment
" I commend you for your diligence although i conclude it is over negative "
Meaning of diligence.....
Careful or PERSISTENT work or effort
As in sticking to researching a project and seeing it through to the end.
It was a compliment but if you don't fully understand the meaning of diligence i can understand your misunderstanding or perhaps you would never expect a compliment from me.....not meant to be patronising just an honest explanation

Careful or PERSISTENT work or effort

Penguin, and nobody is saying you are wrong, just that what you are saying is negative and can't be proved right until it's been finalised.....future events "may" be successful and some past failures "may" be corrected......i think that's a reasonable assumption, who's right and who's wrong is unprovable at the moment and irrelevant

Penguin, why do you always " missread " other people's posts....I wasn't referring to your post being over negative, i was referring to your attitude towards UKOG, i don't know how you came to that conclusion

Penguin, thanks for that, so as you say, as we agree, nothing can be proven either way due to complexities and lack of information, so that is where I'm coming from when I say there's nothing to discuss, nobody is happy with the lack of information but unfortunately that's the way it is....I am not qualified to do guesswork in this field, but i can read comments and research statements and assess their credibility, I commend you for your diligence although i conclude it is over negative.....but thanks for your reasonable reply

Ocelot, absolutely but I think the likelihood is they were intending to discredit you.....on a bigger hiding there I think

Ocelot, it's just the naysayers discreditation process

Yeeeyhaaah, SWIZZY ABBOT replying to an a alledged filtered poster(Ocelot) within 2 minutes.......more porkies

Penguin, "and could you quote where UKOG have said that the water disposal at hh2 a will definitely work "......your answers are getting sillier day by day, you know that there are no guarantees in any complex procedures, just like you can't guarantee it will fail.....as you allude to being the expert can you please give us your guesstimate percentage of success/failure....ps. does that qualify as discussing company procedures

Penguin,, the full sentence was....... "When there is company news i will have something to discuss , until then would you like me to discuss what i would like to happen or past/recent history...factual? or what you would like us to believe.

Now that puts a different slant on things doesn't it.......it emphasises what you do all the time ie:- pick out the bits to make things look different to how they were meant to be......you and the naysaying team do it on many occasions, I got wise to it years ago.....it is a trait of manipulative/argumentative people.......and when it is linked with obsessive megalomania, it becomes unbearable......for the record, yes it would be nice to get a project up and runnin.....without the interference of small minded people who think the world can be changed overnight.....they say you make your own luck........good luck with that

And penguin, there was nothing in that "waffle" that isn't true

Penguin, that would be because Ocelot is also positive.......i know that's a crime as far as you're concerned but as you keep saying it's about opinions

You see anyone who has an alternative view to you, you criticise. You couldn't have a reasonable discussion unless it's with your negative agenda....c'est la vie

Penguin, I don't do guesswork, as I have said before on many occasions i await news updates from the company, you are acting like a child with your "I'm right your wrong attitude" you may delve into information from other sources but you then make it suit your negative agenda, I used to be criticised by you for the amount of posts i made but i came to the conclusion there is no point trying to be reasonable with obsessive megalomaniacs like yourself.....I reiterate.....when there is company news i will have something to discuss.....until then do you want me to discuss what i would like to happen.....or past/ recent history......factual? or what you would like us to believe........yes it appears mr Sanderson only likes to give out good news, so at the moment as their isn't any he is silent. it is also apparent that you only like to talk about bad news and when there isn't any you are noisy , shouting from the rooftops about past history......you may be invested like you say.....only not in UKOG....or you would be totally stupid......which you are definitely not

Penguin, it wasn't a joke, it was an answer given in a fit of pique, as usual you 're not fooling anyone....while I'm here you do criticise other posters often....just not the negative trolls, which in effect means you are supporting them. your opinions on the prospects of UKOG are just that, your opinions......albeit based on Sanderson track record which is not very good, what is really going on at UKOG none of us know, I have my theories but im keeping them to myself until things become clearer.....personal guesswork doesn't prove anything, only arguments, as I have said before the future is ours to see.......good or bad......talks cheap......even cheaper when you've nothing to lose..........and patronising........me.......I don't think so.

Oh and Penguin, speaking of conspiracy theories (in your 16:40 post to Tollesburystu) your "though Ocelot and Ozzy " pop up" when Ade appears as if commanded " BEATS THEM ALL........ ha ha ha.......careful you appear to be losing the plot

Should have said....."that was the time i was reading a succession of posts"