RE: Loxley decision soon5 Jan 2022 23:39
Penguin, re :-15 jan2021 rns you refer to, unsurprisingly you don't refer to the earlier part which states as follows...... " consequently, to remove the need for expensive off -site water disposal via tanker and to maximise oil recovery by supporting reservoir pressure, hh2z will now be reconfigured, subject to consent......etc
Instead you choose other sentences which can be read in two ways because of the " commas " in the sentances, obviously you select the negative version to suit your agenda, but unfortunately your version contradicts the earlier information.
You are playing with words and twisting as usual to decieve readers on this forum, and you have the audacity to accuse others of doing the same.
What you are saying is completely out of context and inaccurate, and you know it.
It's your modus operandi unfortunately.