Member Info for Ozzy52

And i can't believe you missed the h key and hit the m

Twosheds....and why do they call you that Arthur Jackson?

mcadder, take your pick from any of the naysayer hierarchy on here along with the rest of the "Drool or Drip" academy of tosh

That should have read....i will never say lolololol it reminds me too much of slobbering Swizzy Abbott

Mirasol, and the naysayers, what a pop group they are, ......VOICES OF REASON....aaaaaaahahaaaaaaah I will never say lollipop it reminds me too much of slobbering Swizzy Abbott poor dear

Penguin, we'll soon find out won't we.....reality not guesswork,

Penguin,.......in your unbiased opinion?

Sorry i had to go out so i couldn't finish my explanation on why Skwizz is named after Dianne Abbott, (seems to have the same memory on financial reporting and accounting skills.......6th dec21, Skwizz declares, still invested in UKOG......next post (same day).

"Querty , still the same 1k bought at 0.18",
Then declares mid January ...sold my last tranche at a loss bought at 0.18 sold at 0.16, when the sp has been nowhere near 0.16 for months, since it dropped from the last placing, as has been mentioned on many occasions......therefore proving to be extremely inaccurate or dishonest, in the style of Dianne Abbott

Swizzy Abbott , who is consistently calling positive posters " rampers " is now complaining that one of the "accused" has made two consecutive posts that are not ramping....you can't make it up....oh sorry the naysayers usually do.

NAYSAYERS ALWAYS ACTIVE

Justbe sensible for once, noeone on any share in any market forum is there to protect anyone else,what a load of tosh

Ah, and i bet you bought in at 0.02p didn't you ha ha ha.

Ocelot, obviously they just don't want you to post anything positive and also they don't want you to negate their deramping diatribe.....time will tell., Good luck

ibug, thanks, "ah yes i remember it well" Charles Aznevor RIP

Another justbe loaded question, read up on the history, it will give you something to do in your boring life.....good luck

Ibug, thanks for that, took some reading ha ha, as i thought, there was a mention of kl1 stimulation but not allowed under current planning permission (paraphrased because i don't cut and paste).......(for the benefit of pedantic penguin)...i recall they blamed using the wrong mud also...another kock up, unfortunately

Wasn't it said that broadford bridge was uncommercial because it needed fracking, just asking?

Dullo, change the name to Dishonest D1ck, because he is and he is

Penguin, i am not re -writing anything, but i do apologise for not noting who was claiming the photo, but that still does not prove he took it.
If you would like to look again on the left hand side of the shale section it clearly states "horizontal fracking well for gas" so i was only commenting on what I had read

Yes brillo (not).....I had one break on the Megane diamonique convertible , set me back a few bob, but it's only money

Penguin, what part of my opening statement "the article is regarding deep water disposal, and not fracking" didn't you understand. And my post finishes with "and is about the consequences of" deep water disposal "not fracking.

therefore your patronising following conversation was not necessary as I fully understood the article, as i had already said at the beginning that i had scrutinised it, i assume you understand my meaning of that.

With regards to the comment on the building, I did not suggest the photo was rigged from someone from the USGS, show me where if so, I was alluding to someone who presented that photo to the writer of the article. (We all know how reporters can exaggerate and fake things don't we)......please don't add things that aren't there.

" It could mean there was already a problem with the chimney triggered with the earthquake " and it could also mean it was nothing to do with an earthquake at all.

To conclude, I fully understood the article and the cut off diagram of the various concepts of water disposal and injection, very interesting to someone who has a good understanding of geography.