Model1 Jul 2016 10:56
just picking up on labratt's point yesterday
"The MXO example where NCT provided introductions, they still had to fund their share of the stake. ADL, again despite introductions they had to fund their share of the stake. No free carry's."
NCT have not paid anything (yet) for their Participation Rts in MXO, nor have they paid anything to receive the 38M warrants; yes they have an exercise price on the warrants but they paid nothing for those. Both were awarded for the MX introductions. You say no free carry, that is premature. Yes if MXO do something in MXO, NCT has the automatic right to participate - that is the point, but they don't have to. From my understanding, and as discussed quite a bit here, as an investing company, the plan would be for NCT to farm out part of the Participation rights, such that they end up with cash which would fund their end. Hence free carry concept.
As you know NCT have fully funded their ADL Participation Right - now what do you think may happen ADL announce the next development on TOE. I expect NCT to farm out and recover it's costs but retaining a reduced interest. But it could be they may not if it is attractive as some think.
The point is this. NCT have by negotiating deals for both NCT and ADL, put themselves in a position where they have automatic rights, which would not otherwise be there.
If NCT are able to scale up MXO/ADL model by a massive margin with another much bigger deal, would that add significant shareholder value? Go figure.