Member Info for originalharrystamper

Fadec- your post is wholly incorrect. HSO and AC Oil (Greenfield) are now seeking permits to drill and use steam (huff and puff) to force the deeper crude oil (which won’t flow under normal conditions), to the surface. This is not the original leased permit application that was to mine the surface tar sands, with the added possibility of using Petroteq’s licenced IP to build a plant and extract the oil from the sands

OHS

Justroll - have you read the linked document? If not, read points 3-5 on pages 2 and 3. Hoodoo have the exclusive leases to drill and recover all naturally occurring crude petroleum, oil and hydrocarbons, regardless of gravity if produced at the wellhead in liquid form. Heavy Sweet Oil (HSO) have the leases for Bituminous and Asphaltic sands, otherwise known as far sands. It does not embrace any right to recover any liquid hydrocarbon substances. It’s down to interpretation of the lease wording and hence why all parties now need to sit down on the 12th, with the board, as it’s going to take considerably more time to discuss then was planned for todays meeting.

OHS

HF - see my post on TOM regarding the Utah meeting

OHS

Last post was a bit short. A company called 'Hoodoo Mining and Production Company, LLC' were granted State of Utah Oil, Gas and Associated Hydrocarbon Leases covering the entirety of Section 22 and the W½ of Section 23, effective as of May 1, 2018 (these are the areas Heavy Sweet and AC oil propose drilling).

"Hoodoo believes and therefore avers that HSO’s proposed operations are limited by the terms of the HSO Leases to conventional mining of “rock or sand impregnated with asphalt or heavy oil,” AND NOT recovery of oil through a wellbore as contemplated by HSO’s proposed plan of unitization. To interpret the HSO Leases in another other manner renders the exclusive rights granted under the Hoodoo Leases to produce “oil … regardless of gravity if produced at the

wellhead in liquid form” superfluous and meaningless"

https://fs.ogm.utah.gov/bbooks/2023/05_May/Docket/2023-022_471-03_HSOandACOil/2023-022_471-03_20230510.1_HoodooMining&ProductionCompanyLLCsResponseInOppositionToTheRequestForAgencyAction.pdf

As such, all parties have now agreed a continuance special hearing on 12th June 2023 and this has been approved

Few more weeks to wait now unfortunately.......and maybe much longer if Hoodoo's opposition to the permit request proves substantiated

OHS

Crownos et al - It's been postponed until 12th June

OHS

Another RNS stating retail value as opposed to sales revenue!! Furthermore, this latest RNS for 40,000 units equates to a retail value of £20 each but only last month ZED released an RNS stating ZenSafe had placed an order for 10,000 units with a (once again) retail value of £300,000 @ £30 each!! Why the 33% drop in price?

Good article here:

https://ptqmagazines.digitalrefining.com/view/296883399/58/

Use the search bar for 'Quadrise' to take you to the article on pages 58-63

OHS

Si - The supply to the MSC Leandra will be over a two-test regime for each fuel, initially a 1,000 mt proof-of-concept test followed by a 25,000 mt operational test. Validated performance of the fuel will be followed by a commercial supply.

OHS

Could be that TOMCO are awaiting the outcome of the hearing on the 24/05/23 for the proposed Huff & Puff steam injection oil recovery before they commit to purchasing the remaining 90%. As it is at their sole discretion to do so, the delay seems to be from their part - either because they don't want to (yet) or can't raise the funds (yet)?

Scroll to page 19 onwards (just CVs before this):

https://fs.ogm.utah.gov/bbooks/2023/05_May/Docket/2023-022_471-03_HSOandACOil/2023-022_471-03_20230424.1_PetitionersExhibits.pdf

OHS

DofN - whether, hypothetically, OCP is the Moroccan customer or it is indeed someone else, I don't recall reading anywhere what the MSAR/bioMSAR would actually be used for? QED obviously haven't stated otherwise it could allude to who the customer was but considering they've been doing extensive trials with Wartsila, can we assume its to provide their fuel for generating capacity? If the customer is OCP, how are you assuming the thermal energy required for the drying process of either phosphorus rock or phosphate based fertilisers , is provided by using MSAR/bioMSAR if it not to power the rotary kilns for example? Can you further explain what you mean by 'chemical energy like MSAR, bioMSAR etc....?/ Thanks, OHS

Hmmmmm, perhaps you may need to 'invest in knowledge' Nejc into what the Moroccan customer, if it is OCP Group (this has been alluded to on here), would be using the MSAR/BioMSAR for......

OHS

https://pressroom.ifc.org/all/pages/PressDetail.aspx?ID=27486

May be a case of QED arriving too late to the party?......

OHS

Not on Amazon as far as I can see - Can anyone add a link to the Amazon selling channel for this product? There’s an Amazon Choice one for £24.99 which gets a very good star rating so pushing theirs at £30 could meet some competition. I don’t really see the point in releasing an RNS that states ‘Following the production in the UK it is very encouraging that our sub-distributor has developed the platform on Amazon and is now selling our products via that channel’ but then not actually having the product available to buy on there? Also, £300k is an irrelevant figure as that’s the retail price on Amazon, not what revenue ZED will achieve from the order

OHS

https://www.youtube.com/live/D4owkD3shZ0?feature=share

HF14 - this is incorrect. The meeting will no longer include AC Oil’s docket as they have submitted a dismissal request. The next meeting is scheduled for May. See links on the TOM BB that I posted

OHS

Thy have now submitted a new request:

https://fs.ogm.utah.gov/bbooks/2023/05_May/Docket/2023-022_471-03_HSOandACOil/2023-022_471-03_20230410.1_RequestForAgencyAction.pdf

OHS

It's item 3:

3. Docket No. 2023-015 Cause No. 470-09 – In the matter of the Request for Agency Action of HEAVY SWEET OIL, LLC and AC OIL, LLC for an order establishing 40-acre or equivalent drilling and spacing units for the insitu production of heavy oil from sands within the Rimrock and Asphalt Ridge Deposits in Sections 22 and 23, Township 4 South, Range 20 East, Uintah County, Utah.

From this:

https://www.utah.gov/pmn/files/962127.pdf

OHS

Does this docket state that AC Oil LLC have submitted a voluntary motion to dismiss their request to drill?

https://fs.ogm.utah.gov/bbooks/2023/04_Apr/Docket/2023-015_470-09_HSOandACOil/2023-015_470-09_20230407.2_VoluntaryMotionToDismissWithoutPrejudice.pdf

Full Docket here:

https://www.ogm.utah.gov/Board/redesign/2023/04_Apr/Dockets/2023-015_470-09_HSOandACOil.php

OHS

Wind powered ships?! What a time to be alive

I meant to expand more but clicked 'post' to early - regarding MSAR - I feel that industry (particularly the shipping industry) has moved away from implementing cost saving measures with regard to HFO diesel and that using the MSAR emulsified fuel will not be a valid enough reason to compensate for the CO2 emissions it will still produce. BioMSAR was introduced as a means to compensate for this but I feel that too is now in jeopardy as the industry is edging ever closer to net zero fuels and could leave BioMSAR in the shadow, just like MSAR is looks like it is now in the shadow of BioMSAR

OHS