RE: link19 Jan 2019 20:22
It’s the wording. Of course the results don’t have to be similar with results from 6-9 compared to that of 1-5. It goes without saying, maybe even ambiguous waffle. Visible mineralisation is unambiguous and tangible. Seeds get planted on these boards suggesting negativity such as drills missing the target. I’d be gobsmacked if the results were less than ‘ball park’ with what we already have.