Member Info for OrangeMoon

Element - A lot of posters here have upwards of 10/20x these 'massive' sells you're talking about... which is yet just another reminder to how miscalculated you are.

I suppose we should all just dismiss:

Pepas North Prospects,

APTA,

El Cedro,

La Virginceta,

El Pantano

AND our roughly $13M war chest to go treasure hunting with.

You're fighting a losing battle here son. I would come back when you've actually done some proper research and stop embarrassing yourself.

I'm loving Elements lack of research 😂...

And to think... some of us actually considered him a respected poster at one point in time.

Talk about p*ssing into the wind.

I'd stick to GGP mate, it's clearly all you know.

Looking forward to the next 6-12 months here with the first foundation step built (Pepas).

If you can see the picture of the future mining company that our BoD are building... it's a no brainer - Strong Buy

Short term the price will go up and down... but the trend is up, and the Oz of Gold (and Silver) discovered in due course will start to increase too.

I'll say it too.

I for one am glad Element1 has been talking today...

It's confirmed my inital thinking and exposed his true presence here - that being one of envy. Not interest.

Although he is knowledgeable with respect to operations and mining in the paterson province in Western Australia, it seems the buck stops there, regardless of any valuable information and discussions provided by posters here, which again, he could have researched himself prior posting.

Good luck with your investments in the future Hydro, from now, I'll be taking everything you say with a pinch of salt.

Notably, GGP have a war chest this year of $50M-$60M (FY26)... So with the expected 240,000 drill programme, I'd expect some good grades to be produced during this campaign, the risk is lower on known deposits.

Grades at APTA are impressive, and with OMI are a much smaller company with a much smaller war chest in comparison. Therein lies the value.

Element1 — Credibility and reputations take a long time to build, so I'm surprised you would come here and lower both on your own behalf.

After taking some time to consider your posts out of respect, I've come to the conclusion that you did not hold OMI as you first suggested and have been deceptive in your intentions yesterday (also noting your first interaction on this board).

I would usually have taken the information you provide in good faith, but that has been crushed due to your obvious lack of research on the company.

Which begs the question: Why did you decide to post in the first place? Why on the 2nd day down after MRE issued? Whatever compelled you to write such a thing hasn't done you or anyone else any favours.

We were not born yesterday and now you have many calling you out on this board, asking questions your scrambling to get answers for. Again - Due to lack of research.

Come back when we have the APTA MRE, Discovery declared at El Pantano, and further drilling on our other three 'potential' tier-1 assets later this year — noting that we are fully funded for the lot.

And for the record, our BoD are more than competent to run this company and has done a great job for holders in recent years. We're all more than happy with them.

GGPThruandtru, I take your views on and give them thought —you have context to look into and that's fine, even if we disagree on some points. It's balance that's good on these forums to prevent an echo chamber—I agree.

What I do not stand for is posters who have zero context to back up their case. Chat history often exposes these posters for their limited knowledge of investing in general, or their flip-flopping positions depending on what their current agenda is. Everyone gets a chance, up until a point. (the likes of 400, B-positive, tungsteninv, have all lost their option of a reply, all green binned this week - I only take on genuine investors)

As for Element1 (aka Hydrogen) I held him in quite high regard prior to today. Holders here are more than aware that the story does not stop at PEPA's. OMI's value does not depend on PEPA's MRE alone… Some value has to be given to the forward-looking investment plan here and that is what most long-term investors see with our multiple other prospects. In fact, that's the only value most AIM shares have without FCF and a balance sheet. And yes, some of these are projects are not yet proven... but this is exploration; speculation can't be dismissed and we are edging our way closer to each day to a new discovery - fully funded. The true 'potential' here lies in the investment case of Pepas being the key to non-dilutive funding, not a single project alone.

Although I no longer follow GGP closely, I have held and been involved since 2016/2017 pre-Havieron discovery. So I have been through the ups and downs too. Just disappointed to see some of the people I went through this before also punching OMI with some cheap shots and limited research.

Jings, respectfully I disagree. I had a few queries/questions last night that were mostly all resolved via these tweets today. There are always two sides to every coin, but I believe Brad is doing a great job and feel the tweets today helped clear a few things up with respect to the forward plan.

What I didn't expect today was the sheer amount of (what used to be) respectful posters coming out to have a go. There was really no need, and still yet none have come back to restore any remains of the credibility they once had.

Games will be played, but I really didn't expect GGP holders to partake in the slaughter, especially considering the games we/they have also endured over the years. True colours and all that.

I had always taken @Element1 as a well informed and respected poster...

Although recently his posts/picks have been questionable outside of GGP. And by questionable I do mean his research has been dreadfull.

Does he think PEPAs was a sole play for OMI here? And does he think they need to build a mine?

A little embarrassing to say the least. I hope 'batman' responds with something credible... because he is getting torn to shreds here.

Https://x.com/i/status/2021486574949761543

We can all build our own picture of what we think OMI (Orosur Mining) will look like in the months and years ahead...

It fills me with confidence that the one that I'm building aligns with Brad's, backed by proven high-grade results and smart, forward-thinking planning, with a little humour thrown in for good measure. I like Brad, and he is a big reason to back OMI, it's certainly one of mine.

"We can only run on the smell of a oily rag for so long." - Correct.

Now let's get exploring with that war chest of ours :)

That essay was a lot shorter in my head... but it's just the basics. Writing isn't my strong point—maths and calculations are. Reading through the comments, this following sentence would have been much easier to just reiterate:

"You're getting Anzá + El Pantano for FREE while buying Pepas at a 30% discount to NPV."

Well summed up, whoever the original poster was... 👏

Stepping away from the share price action—which we all tend to focus on a little too much—we must keep sight of the bigger picture.

Pepas (PEPA's) was always a relatively small golden nugget of high-grade gold. We needed to advance it to a MRE status and get it on the books as a starting point for valuation, and thanks to its exceptionally high grades, it offers a unique opportunity to potentially self-fund our larger projects—something rarely seen in the junior mining industry these days.

At Pepas North, we have the "Sisters" (repetitive high-grade structures) and the "Mother" (the main feeder system). With our remaining ~$14m war chest, we still have plenty of room to explore and poke around. We originally discovered Pepas with just $1m invested... so the show is far from over—it's only just been confirmed and de-risked with this initial resource.

APTA — If we're hunting for serious ounces, look no further. Below surface (starting from >200m depth), APTA hosts grades comparable to Pepas—and in some spots even higher. A rough estimate here points to potential for around 2 million ounces, though this will require further drilling and geological understanding to define properly.

El Pantano — We've just intersected a substantial mineral system (gold/silver epithermal style). Size is yet to be fully confirmed, but if the geology and rock types line up with those at Newmont's nearby Cerro Negro mine, we're potentially looking at multi-million-ounce scale.

El Cedro and La Virgencita — These are also very large, highly promising prospects with significant early-stage potential (e.g., El Cedro as a large gold porphyry system).

As LegalWolf pointed out yesterday, Pepas essentially serves as our "checkbook" for enabling further non-dilutive funding going forward. It was always the core investment case here—not because of its standalone size (which, as balanced investors, we must acknowledge has proven smaller than many initially anticipated), but because of the future potential it unlocks. That's what most long-term investors and institutions are focused on.

Not today, not tomorrow... but over the next 12–18 months, the common view among them is clear: OMI (Orosur Mining) will ultimately control far more ounces than just the current ~200k Au starting point from Pepas. A solid foundation for early cash flow while we continue to derisk and grow the larger targets.

"They’ll be times in the future we’ll see sisters delivered"

I think you were right the first time Doc 👍

Plus Pepas feeder.

"PEPAS is not the prize here, it's merely the cheque book to opening up the much larger projects"... Well phrased Legal Wolf 👏👏

The Tungstenidiot has now been filtered.

TungstenInvestor,

Why wouldn't you be positive regarding a share that your involved in?

It makes no sense to invest when you don't believe in the company... Who cares what other people do or say, you put your money in, you play the game, you take your chances.

Long term holders here know what they have and will take the opportunity to top up. Just as I will.

Your rhetoric this morning is emotional and child like throwing your toys out the pram. Long term views here are still sound.

Tungsteninvestor - I do recall brads interpretation of a 'small deposit'. However he stated this was what would be classed as a small deposit worth going into MRE for... it was not directly linked to PEPA's.

You should not have taken that or anything written on these boards as investment advice.

If you have done so, be careful with the crayons, especially the really sharp ones.

This MRE is the ticket that you can take to the bank (Not literally)... ROI with investment @ Pepas conservative 5x IMO @ $3000 spot.

Last time I checked, retail banks offer around 1-3% Annual return...

Who's got some spare change for a few spades and a wheel barrow? (Low Capex).

First deposit in the bag (major milestone complete), well-done to our BoD and OMI team.

The solid investment case here is Pepas Deposit — a true golden nugget. High-grade (from surface), low-tonnage potential that should — all going well — return multiples of the current market cap. This will probably take 2–3 years to come to fruition and start delivering those returns. It's a great long-term investment case in my opinion. I think the institutional investors agree.

It's often stated that "where there is gold, there is more"… and as Brad has said, "we've only just scratched the surface… we haven't even begun to look deep."

Initially, I invested here because of Pepas and the potential for another deposit of this type. I haven't lost any optimism about the prospect of finding Pepas North — in fact, I've only grown more confident.

So remember: regardless of the distractions caused by short-term price fluctuations (whether in the metals market or OMI's share price) and the emotions they may trigger for investors watching the hourly/daily/weekly charts, our deposits have been forming over millions of years… and just like me, they aren't going anywhere.

JaneMtc, you're suggesting a 15% drop from 35 - 30.

It's likely to drop yes, but to suggest a drop of that magnitude only reflects emotion, and not a longer term view.

Calm down.

Appreciated @PEAKDREAD... hope that posts gives some restbite to any uneasy hands today.

RE. Gold price: The pullback is expected and is most welcome for this gold bull run. Just as it was called in October 2025 (for the non-believers). I for one am settled with this pull back... lots of investors in the sector were getting increasingly uneasy at the rate of change.