Member Info for OrangeMoon

@jlb1985,

Search for 'Orosur Mining' in telegram and it should come up with a group/channel to select.

If you have any issues, feel free to private message me on here and I'll help you get in.

Hoping we hear something this week with regards to El Pantano.

Good luck to all genuine investors.

"you know that “rock chips” are totally unrealistic and unreliable indication of anything. they indicate nothing about what’s below."

Yes Element, I'm very well aware of the inaccuracies involved with geo-chem works in the early exploration stage.

Never the less, they are still a good indication the land/area isn't barren and are usefull when accompanied with other surface exploration activities to form 'part' of the picture.

Correct regarding black hills - but just because black hills failed to deliver (and many other GGP projects after Hav), certainly doesn't mean you can apply the same logic to every other company and prospect going forward, especially those that are located on a different continent.

It is easy to see why investors are so excited about each of Orosur’s prospects.

The Company has already confirmed a significant gold deposit at Pepas in the prolific Middle Cauca belt, gold prices are at all-time highs, and — after years of preparation and surface work — Orosur has set itself up nicely to begin drilling multiple highly prospective gold projects.

Bootstrap mining concept with multiple high-grade gold projects with 100% ownership.

Fully funded for drilling into 2027.

El Cedro is described as a large gold porphyry/epithermal system featuring a 'cluster' of gold porphyry intrusions.

- Two related porphyry systems

- High-grade soil anomalies (frequently exceeding 0.3 g/t Au and locally >1 g/t Au)

- Earlier work identified porphyry potential through mapping, sampling, and geophysics, (with rock chips returning >10 g/t Au in veins)

- Drone-mounted magnetic survey recently flown over El Cedro and the nearby APTA area

Targets being identified for driling in comming weeks.

Note: Porphyry systems are typically deeper, bulk-tonnage deposits compared to higher-grade, shallower epithermal systems such as Pepas. Initial drilling at El Cedro is therefore expected to require deeper holes from the outset — similar to standard porphyry exploration approaches — and will likely demand substantially more metres drilled to adequately test and delineate these potentially larger mineralised systems.

We are fully funded for this initial maiden campaign at El Cedro.

What we do know about El Pantano - Just sticking to the facts:

- Maiden greenfield exploration with similar 'rocks' to that of Cerro Negro mine (90Km North of El Pantano)

- 25 km long SE-NW rift-related structure

- Early results confirmed the presence of a low-sulfidation epithermal mineral system.

- Campaign was extended from an original 3000m to roughly 5000m

- Last hole (ELP-024) was was angled down 600m to test 'the third dimension'

We await a coherent story to be given to the market about what we have found here... (After RNS issued).

"I do get stuff wrong… don’t get me wrong. Just not very often."

Like today, when you mistakenly thought this thread - RE: OMI - El Pantano (our project in Argentina) - ... was APTA?

Does the record reset each morning when you wake up?

I'm no geologist... but I can confidently state your current analysis on El Pantano comes from a place of pure imagination.

Ofcourse, you could admit that you were wrong and got your projects mixed up?

Interesting...

So you are sticking with your comments/analysis below on El Pantano geology?

"Sure orange - essentially it’s the nature of the faulting. Everything is badly truncated and consequently lacking m in depth and very spread out. It’s just not what you want in mining. You want continuity. Multiple Small mined spread out far and wide just make for poor economies of scale."

Thanks Element,

That’s a very long-winded way of saying you made a mistake.

I’m looking forward to the results at El Pantano. Not only have the visual indications in the cores been structurally exciting, but we also extended the original 3,000m drilling programme to 5,000m, finishing with a deep 600m angled drill to test “the third dimension,” as Brad called it.

Overall, it feels like a strong success for a first greenfield maiden drilling campaign. We aren’t expecting to hit any economic intersections on this initial pass — those odds are very slim — but it would be a nice bonus.

This is a very large area, and the company has noted on several occasions that this project may be suited for “a big friend".

However, just to reiterate, the geology here looks excellent. It may only be the economics that are in question, and those will of course need assays before we can draw any firm conclusions on how to progress.

Element — Appreciate the detailed reply on El Pantano’s geology.

It would be quite surprising for that assessment to apply to a virgin greenfield drilling campaign like this one.

I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt — it’s the weekend after all.

Would you like to take another look?

Hint: “different postcode”.

Food for thought:

Will assays from MAP-106 be enough to pull the trigger on that third drill?... or will it be one of the other two holes (107/108)?...

Although MAP-106 has taken us quite a bit longer to drill than expected (over 5 weeks), holes MAP-107 and MAP-108 should be complete in a much shorter timeframe.

Each of these three holes has the potential to provide a material upgrade to the deposit — strong enough to justify spinning up that third rig in conjunction with MRE infill drilling.

APTA could end up developing into a similar 'style' of deposit to Zijin Mining’s Buriticá Mine, located just 60 km to the north (10.7 million ounces of gold at a very high average grade of 8.21 g/t Au). Importantly, Buriticá started off in a similar way to APTA — as a promising but under-drilled high-grade epithermal system — before Continental Gold drilled it aggressively and defined the high-grade pods that made it a world-class asset.

APTA may not be as big as Buriticá mine, but more manageable for a small junior such as OMI.

Whilst many of us may have been investing or trading for a considerable time, others may just be starting out. So these boards are great when newcomers arrive and want quick notes from a BB.

Personally, I’m happy to discuss all positives and negatives here out in the open (as in Telegram). Not only for my benefit, but for those newcomers too.

Some come just to read and don’t often post, even if it’s just to get a picture of what’s going on without having to trawl through so many months or years of RNSs. What brings about balance better than a thorough discussion?

So every now and then, away from the high intensity of a good RNS day, I believe it’s a better use of airtime to post something with context and share some notes on my own research here, rather than reacting emotionally to something one may or may not like.

I’ve learned a lot over the years here on these BBs, and a big part of that is due to the information shared by others — both positive and negative. Again, it’s all about balance.

So instead of some posters throwing insults or name-calling, try throwing questions back instead or even better, provide a contextual rebuttal. Ask for context on both the positives and negatives — and let the discussion create food for thought, not fuel for the fire.

"All looking very interesting at El Pantano - the lads like what they see, but then geologists always do.

Original 3000m program now up to about 5000m. Have managed to twist the drillers arm to stay for one more deep hole as there are some geological questions we want answered down there. That should take another 10 days or so, then we can let them go to their next client, and we can pull it all together."

Hard to pick out the negatives from the companies own X post regarding the geology. Especially the spend going in for that last deep hole.

If you know something we don't about El Pantano, please do share.

Element,

"The geology here just isn't good enough"...

Can you provide any context as to why you think this?

All we have heard since the start of this maiden campaign is how 'good' the geology actually is... infact, 'good' would be an understatement.

I'm of the belief they have some of the assays back and are awaiting the final batch. I can't see the first batch having been stored there for 5 months waiting on all the others.

They will already have enough of a coherent story to tell us, but...

ELP-024 (our deepest and final hole) will be the most interesting one to note IMO, and may change the whole picture entirely.

Can't see any harm in a bit more information regarding Grand Pepas and APTA concept testing... maybe even touching on our targets for El Cedro (outside of the tweets).

With the latest tweet (X post) regarding El Pantano assay delays now 3 weeks passed, we must be close to receiving some information about this project.

An investor presentation/webinar would be great to fill in some gaps and has also been noted by Brad previously due to the complexity of what they have found...

Next week would be as good a time as any (Post El Pantano Assays RNS release).

@yasirasmi should be out this week... Accompanied with a few others (IMO).

Sein, true for a lot of AIM companies in general I would agree, however at what point in the last 6 months could be considered outwith a closed period? And at what point in the next 6 months? Not likely with our four ongoing project areas... a lot easier for single project exploration plays.

The question being asked repeatedly regarding our BoD holding is not a valid criticism when they are unable to do so I'm afraid. It's just the usual FUD from the usual suspects.

The BoD seem happy with their RSU's, a perfectly legitimate way of building a stake to align with shareholders without breaking the rules.

That's the regulatory reality.

Both Brad and Louis have addressed their holdings in previous communications - December Investor presentation .

https://youtu.be/ByLWLLXcSBU?si=MYlsVZIqmLm4lvjt

You will find this 'traditional question' being answered at 34:00 minutes onwards.