Listen to our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode 'Uncovering opportunities with investment trusts' with The AIC's Richard Stone here.
WG818: surely if Angus default, Mercuria can exercise their rights under the charge and take over the assets? For Aleph to be able to do very much, the balance of the £12mm loan, capital and interest, will have to be repaid. That will depend on the bridging loans going through. So I expect they will. After that, who knows? Mercuria will immediately get their 8% royalty, which will be an additional significant cost. And there will still be a massive overhang of shares.
I think it’s time to stop following this. Hands up the shareholders who don’t feel they’ve been royally legged over.
“The Company has now to execute the final documentation after which it will proceed to completion and drawdown.”. This is from the 14July RNS. So the ball is in Angus’s court.. The £3.5mm payment to Mercuria for the missed hedge payments is due by today. Aleph are providing the bridging loan. I don't suppose Mercuria care very much how they get paid (subject to the covenants on the £12mm. loan) but I think it’s quite unlikely that they won’t want some additional sweetener for agreeing to yet another extension. It’s hard see why Angus won’t meet the payment today, they only had to finalise the documentation. So there’s should be an RNS saying it’s been paid by 6pm. Why they’d leave it to the last moment is a mystery to me.
Balancedviewer: I don’t expect Mercuria to pull the plug on Angus today, whether Angus meets the payment when it’s due or not. But if the payment is missed again, there will b a price to pay for their continued support and the only other recourse Angus has is a further big share placing. So some arrangement fee may be negotiated for Mercuria’s benefit while a share issue of some kind is put together. If Angus have got the money from the bridging loan, no problem, other than meeting its terms in due course. Either way, there should be an RNS today.
TerryMC1: it’s true that Vast is in a difficult position with regard to the large overdue loan repayment to Mercuria. But as I said yesterday, Mercuria doesn’t appear to want to own mines etc., it wants to make large profits on very expensive loan terms to companies who do. Look at Angus Energy. As long as Vast’s shareholders are prepared to put up more cash through share placings, I think it’s unlikely that Mercuria will pull the plug. The downside is that they’re not a charity and there’s always a quid pro quo. Capstone know more than anyone on these chat boards, though.
Bubblepoint: WG818 is quite correct that a payment of £3.5mm, financed by the prospective £6mm.bridging facility (which itself is awaiting only Angus’s signature) is due to be.paid to Mercuria today, If the news of this timetable merited an earlier RNS, surely the actual payment does too?
360phil: he’s an accountant, he’s an insider and he’s selling. It may just be that he’s not being exposed all day long to bullish posts written by people who’ve done no research and haven’t a clue about the financial situation. Or he may merely want the sales proceeds for another project.
HITS: he got a very sweet deal, didn't he?
Re solvency, if a company has debts which it can’t meet, and particularly if those debts bear demanding covenants, as Vast’s do, then on the date when payment is due the lender may be able to seize its assets and sell them for whatever he can get for them to get his money back. Or keep the assets.
Vast has missed the repayment date twice on its loan. The only way it will be able to repay the debt in the near term is through finding and selling its diamonds - the chance of which appears to me to be negligible.
However, Mercuria doesn’t seem to want to run mines and has given them more rope twice and it does appear that Capstone has increased its shareholding. On balance, I’d be surprised if Vast are taken over/asset stripped. More likely is a more onerous, longer-term loan proposition, possibly with royalties and a generous grant of equity/warrants. This would relieve the pressure on the share price of fears of imminent bankruptcy, at the price of a much larger proportion of future cash flows going to the lenders. Investors will have to work out for themselves whether this will be good or bad for the share price. I should expect a relief rally, before the terms sink in. Capstone are smarter than I am, however, and a holding of their size will take a while to sell. If they’re in it for the medium or long term, it may be that Vast is a better investment than it looks at the moment.
Fat finger: ... or he thinks a price below 1p is still a good price at which to sell.
Yes, HITS, but surely the important point about Mr. Forrest’s sales is that the original acquisition price of his shares isn’t relevant. What’s relevant are his view of their current value, and as an insider he should be well informed on that, and his own financial needs. He’s either got something better to invest in or he thinks a price below 1
Asimpleinvestor: I think investors are concerned about Vasts’s ability to meet their debt repayment schedule in the absence of the diamonds. But if Capstone is prepared to buy 8% of the company at this point, I should think it’s unlikely that the lenders are about to pull the plug. If this is correct, there should be substantial upside in the share price from current levels.
Asimpleinvestor: thanks again. It’s much clearer on the site you’ve attached than in the company RNS, with my mini iPad. I wonder what the initial swap contract was all about and who was on the other side of it. In any case, it’s history now, Capstone appears to own outright more than 8%. They must be pretty sure that Vast’s lenders won’t pull the plug, diamonds or no diamonds.
Asimpleinvestor: thanks for this. Have I missed an announcement about it?
Isn’t Capstone’s investment in Vast a swap contract, not a shareholding? They have the voting rights over their investment but own no shares, if I’m reading the April RNS right. I don’t know what the implications of this are for the share price. If anyone does, I’d be interested to see it.
Do you really believe that Zimbabwean voters could give two hoots about a British mining company taking possession of Zimbabwe diamonds that were put in the Reserve Bank vaults fifteen years ago? They’d be more surprised than I would be to find that the diamonds are still there. If they are, I dare say they’d vote to keep them if they could. Rule of law? Zimbabwe? That’s a good one.
Asimpleinvestor: of course the present government of Zimbabwe knows where the diamonds are, or where they have gone. Secondly, Vast‘s entitlement to them will not be In the top one million factors in deciding the Zimbabwe electorate’s choice of a new government.
The diamonds were deposited there a long time before 2019.
If Mr. Mugabe sent a couple of his fellow freedom fighters down to the Reserve Bank and made the Governor an offer he couldn’t refuse, I don’t suppose that a period of six months would have ensued before the diamonds were delivered into their custody, while they discussed the appropriate protocols for giving a customer back his property, which had been placed in the Bank’s safekeeping.
I can think of only one reason why the Bank is putting all these obstacles in the way of giving back Vast’s diamonds. It seems to me that investing in a company in the hope that its finances will be rescued by the prompt delivery of its valuable but probably absent property, when the alternative could well be bankruptcy, is sticking your neck out a long way.
Bubblepoint: the poet Kipling put it best in his poem “if”, which ends with the words
“Yours is the Earth and all that’s in it
And, which is more, you’ll be a man, my son.”
In the middle of the poem he says this, as a condition of becoming a man:
“If you can bear to hear the words you’ve spoken
Twisted by knaves to set a trap for fools...”
There's nothing new in the world, it was always thus. You just have to put up with these people and what they’re saying about you. Rise above it and don’t let it get to you, just don’t engage with them.