Member Info for Onetomany

@BP I did say that I thought the funding terms could be tied to the March outcome but that was speculating. I think another RNS saying talks are ongoing and positive is a good sign no? They will of course update the market on completion of the workover, finance terms I am 50/50 on whether they com enow or March.

Looks like it. Update on the progress can’t be far off now.

Do we think it is finished yet? Production consistently low suggesting still ongoing

I agree MrRSoul. I will refrain from posting until Monday.

@HB thanks and likewise good luck and hope we can get a deal soon.

On the abuse I hear you, but if you saw everything in a full list you would agree with me. The language and context was disgusting and more recently included sexual references to my recently late parents. No human being can brush that off. They are vile.

As for OSD it’s weird as we have some good debate and suddenly he jumped on a bandwagon with a few others and rapidly changed from fun and jokes to equally horrible content. On the ANGS board there is lots of slagging off but it’s not vitriolic and not a targeted campaign of abuse. There is a difference.

OTM - trying to do the right thing.

@HB I’m just wondering why he was so confident of a deal any time from now (his words in early September) then a complete change of words at end of November.

I’ve only followed since September and you know I never liked the interviews and pointless RNSs. None of it felt professional to me. Even the way he was chuckling when answering his own questions. Other have made comment about issues before regarding placing so it seems not an isolated concern.

Just didn’t give me a good feeling but I am hanging on to hope that the product has something valuable.

Sorry joshing. I’ve been the victim of a coordinated campaign and everyone can see that, including the perpetrators. The posts are removed but I have them - you would be shocked at the number and the content.

Last weekend alone (2 days) 42 posts were removed. 20 were mockery, 22 were deeply offensive and 12 were just disgusting.

In total there are over 200 such posts in a very short time frame. These are (mostly) coordinated, consistent and highly offensive and dehumanising. They clearly show a course of conduct.

Slagging each other off, within limits, is part and parcel of internet forums I guess. Persistent vitriol, I’m sure most decent people will agree, is not acceptable. Where do you draw the line between forum rudeness and criminal acts?

I have tried not to engage with any of them, particularly when the abuse starts. Last night I let myself down by getting in to a debate and ended up complicit in spamming the thread for an hour. Apologies again.

How a small group of adults (I assume) can behave in such a coordinated way is beyond me.

Back to IMM 🙏🏼

@toffee I didn’t understand that, maybe a typo?

What are everyone’s opinions on the compete change of narrative from Tim on the deal timing. Forgive me as I’m not listening to the interviews again so the below is my recollection on the words used and inferences made.

Sept interview:

Tim wasn’t only clear that a deal would be done by end of the year but he also stated on more than one occasion that a deal could happen any time from now (Sept). He also talked about the pharmas coming back to them right after the patent filed.

Delay interview:

Tim talks about how obviously (or as you would expect) such talks are complicated and take a long time. Why didn’t he expect this months earlier ? He all metiekd in the delay interview that they had reached out to pharmas - the opposite narrative from Sept comments.

So what really changed on these two points? My opinion, fwiw, is that the initial partners they were talking to walked away and they then had to reach out to new potential partners and start again. This also makes sense when you consider they went to the networking event in January, potentially to promote the product further. Just my opinion when I look at the chain of events and particularly the detail on the words.

Any other thoughts ?

I’m trying hard not to respond. The obsession is unbelievable.

@Jen I trust that is aimed at the 200+ plus posts (yes it’s now over 200) that have been attacking and insulting me ? Yes it is very clear that it is mischief as you put it, there is now a clear course of conduct. It is quite appalling and you can see that LSE have been giving warnings, suspensions and even bans it seems.

I know I ‘took the bait’ yesterday and replied to some of the latest vitriol but at least I remained polite.

I’m sorry lord, you are correct. Yesterday I got a little bit dragged in to their abuse & harassment and annoyed at myself for reaching those lows. For someone to come back under a new poster name and continue the obsession does become frustrating.

It is very clear that all I am doing is trying to get this board discussing IMM and I was making good progress then it all started again yesterday.

Apologies for getting dragged in and for contributing to the spamming, it was a moment of frustration only and now 100% back to IMM and keeping this board free from insults.

Oh my god, one tries to instil fear whilst under investigation from Police Scotland (on hold at my discretion )

It is clear that the banned have been affected. Haram, it really is sad but we are better off without them. Let us talk only IMM and not the vanished.

@Nettles yes there were many insults but I have managed to remove those. Now it is a clean board.

OTM - stopping abuse

I have no fear at all. I am moderating and making this a better place to discuss IMM. No shame here

OTM - cleaning up Greek streets

That I have finally turned this board in to IMM only. This is why we are here, please respect that

My Lord, what an inane reply. Again let us keep this to IMM only please. I do not like off topic chats.

OTM - Keeping it clean, in the face of adversity

There will be no threats on this board. If anyone senses such, please share and I will sort.

IMM only please.

Sorry for those posters spamming with nonsense.

I have a question that I would like feedback on.

Tim was clearly over confident when he said in September that a deal could happen any time from ‘now’ (then). In November he then states that clearly it is obvious these things take time (forgive me as that is not a literal translation).

Now why do we think he went from feast to famine? Was he lying ? Did he just not have any clue? Was he trying to max Lanstead deal? Was he honest then realised he was wrong? Is P140 maybe not likely to be commercially viable?

There HAS to be a reason. I was clearly in advising you all of this about turn on interviews 3. Now it is real so let us debate.

OTM - moderating the board and keeping it real to IMM