Member Info for oldskool

W+Sn+AU = Ejector seat on a helicopter.

W+Sn+AU = Ejector seat on a helicopter.

W+Sn+AU = Ejector seat on a helicopter.

I have been elsewhere, the places where you can make a few pounds like. So, the leader has 'gone bush'. Nothing, zilch, nowt, from the CEO. The PR loving, chest hair showing, hot air merchant is nowhere to be seen. Come on that is odd. He absolutely knows he has dropped a sh&t in the PI's lap. Who now trusts MM? This is there with the lowest a CEO can go, or in the case of MM maybe he still has a rat sandwich to give. Possibly even two. BB's full of venom. Share sites slating MM. Oh dear Michael, I would consider staying in the bush if I were you. He has almost become a parody of a typical aussie AIM/ASX CEO. He could even pop up on a Lunatics Christmas Special (see Netflix). I wonder which family member he would be, maybe he could play ' The uncle from out West' - always covered in red dust, wearing dungerees and carrying a pick axe. Stick another shrimp on the barrrrrbie maaaarrrrte.

Franny...that was me. After this weekend, I am not so sure.

Thechaser. People know about the share, the problem is that means they also know about MM. There is no news from MM, why would there be? He is still allowing the rat sandwich to be digested. No more placings may have instilled some faith, but now we have had two more when we are apparently selling product (at what rates and price remains unknown to all and most likely MM too - remember that video where he clearly didn't know what was being produced). Yes I say two placings as the latest dilution is a placing all but in name only. Delays continue and I wouldn't be at all surprised if MM did not put clauses in the contract re delays and compensation. He is too busy chasing shiney balls. Over stretched yourself MM? I still remember how much you spent kitting at the offices in Italy with the pre CORO oil company.
Mogwhy. He has diluted his holding, consistently. He once owned several percent more than he does now. He was at about 22% (from memory) now he is about 17 to 18%. I didn't make a note of that at the weekend but did note that it has fallen.
Lots of confirmation bias this morning, to be expected mind. With Jaf leaving this BB is at risk of becoming it's own echo chamber of MM loveliness. I didn't always agree with Jaf but never filtered (or maybe once ha) him as a fair bit of what he said was correct, perhaps just the delivery at times was tiresome. Others are filtered because they are d%cks. Anyway the smoke blowers will shoot me down and we shall here the words 'it will come back'. It may. Those words being said should make people review the stock. I am selling a few now. A bank holiday review and this is starting to smell a little off to me.
NO gold update (how late?)
Proven financial miscalculations.
NO Regua FID (how late?)
NO more placings (really?)
Shareholder value (please read the RNS's to see how many times this has been mentioned and look at the continual decline in SP). Compare to ORM.
Copper update?
Licence update?
Grant - what are the criteria for this? What is the latest?
Anyone seen any 'thick and fast' over the past 12 months?
Lack of open market purchasing.
No salary....but he does take money doesnt he. More than one way to skin a cat.
NO interviews where he faces direct challenge? See what other CEO's do and many use more than 2 or 3 formats.
NO PR, and we pay how much for that sh%t? Consistently not replying to e-mails or other comms.
I will continue to hold some shares, but this share needed a root to branch review and I ain't happy.
MM has had every opportunity to reassure people after the last cash call. No. Why not? It is OUR company.
There is every opportunity for this to come good but risks have increased and reward decreased. Tungsten price...unknown other than right now.
Pays your money peeps. Pays your money.
I would love this to be 2p. But....
I have now put my armour on and will await the arrival of the arrows. :-)

GIT. You are funny. You make wild assumption, baseless. Totally baseless. You destroy any credibility with comments such as
'I presume your reference to HR dealing with people actually means Punishing people for having an addiction, really ! If so, I think that says a lot about you.'
You presume wrong, as I have already pointed out. You take your own interpretation of someone's word and rework it to then sell as a statement of fact.
Here you go again..some loosely based assumption that I may have worked in HR. No I haven't. What if I had? Funnily enough I have experience of HR supporting people return to work after serious illness or injury. HR ensuring occupation health needs are met, including working cooperatively with medical professionals. Ensuring legislation surrounding DSE assessments is implemented. Ensuring maternity and paternity legislation is implemented. Working time directives are completed and implemented. Ensuring reasonable adjustments are made for those with physical and/ or mental health concerns thereby allowing them access to all workplaces and maintaining their ability to work or return to work. What about ensuring discrimination is dealt with either by means of education or enforcement? All HR based and all pretty good by me. Thankfully they also ensure the lazy, inefficient, lying, thieving employees are seen out the door in the correct way. Yes, a coin has two sides.
Bigoted, egotistical, self centred, self serving...I have no evidence AT ALL to support that statement against anyone I have ever seen comment on any board let alone this one. I am confident you are the same, primarily because they remain unknown (on the whole). Sadly, as I have already pointed out, you do like to make wild assumptions. I suspect you know little about the majority of the people on this board or others, bar the odd meeting perhaps. You should you careful with language, bigot is a powerful word. Sadly it is often used by bigots to close down those that are not. The word has, to a degree, been misappropriated. Much like the fascists of the future will call themselves the anti facsist (some attribute that wording to Winston Churchill, but it is more likely aphorostic drift)
Bobtree. When you use the word 'their ', to whom do you refer? Are you meaning ALL HR departments and THEIR staff? Such wide brush statements suggest ignorance.

Hbob. Apologies. It was GIT. So GIT, you response says more about you then me. You see HR as punitive. I see them as supportive, probably influenced by experience.

Actually Hbob, I think your response says more about you than it does me.

Hbob. No you are quite incorrect. I think you need to reflect on the wider drugs issue. A typical socialist response is too seek the 'otherside' to justify their stance with an often extreme or irrelevant point (ses straw man and alike). I did not mention addicts nor any particular drug or addiction. I mentioned legalise all drugs, whether they be opiate based or not. I do not want a mechanic fixing the breaks on my car having been chasing the dragon or snorting cocaine. Nor a surgeon repairing damaged joints. Drugs are rife Hbob. They are becoming the social norm for many parts of society. I know those in the medical world and mechanical world use illegal drugs. We cant stop that. Random testing, regular and routine, at least offers some safeguards for users and those using them. Large organisations already do this. Any breaches of your employment contract, well that is indeed a HR issue. I NEVER said addicts would not be treated fairly by HR. Did I even mention addicts? I merely said, dealt with. You, as a good socialist, assumed the worst (see above). I never said anything of the sort. Clean drugs (heroin not mixed with talc, rat poison, cement powder). More tax receipts, disempowerment of crime gangs (sex trade, County lines, slavery, crime) and reduced costs connected to NHS or use the tax gained to support the NHS. Less wasted police time. Freeing up of courts. Destruction of supply chain that involves the poor in the 3rd world being used as mules, workers, slaves. They could now be paid and taxed. This would spread wealth, as a socialist is that not what you want? Clean needles and access to support services - less taboo. Better access to sexual health care. You will not stop drug use, you will not stop addiction, but you can manage it better. Everyone that consumes alcohol is not an addict. If alcohol was released in to society today it would be given class A status and outlawed overnight. Remember alco-pops? No, there was not mass death or alcoholism related surge with the youth of the time. On another point, how do you justify your socialist stance when investing in a miner that will mine a product that will be used in warfare? Another odd one.

As I have said before Hbob. I look forward to seeing your significant donation to the needy if WRES comes good. Ideally all of it. Spread the wealth, or are you another champagne drinker? I am very conscious Hbob. Anyway, got to pop out....it is a religious day so Wickes and Travis Perkins it is ;-)

GIT. How do you propose dealing with the drug issue? I say legalise it all. Control it and tax it. One caveat. Testing. All employees are subject to random drug testing. HR can then deal with the fallout of any employee rules that are broken.

GIT and Hbob. I have to say I am confused. This is the stock market, well it is a BB about the stock market. The stock market is the core, and beating heart, of a working and functioning (if left free from government f%ckwittery) capitalist system. Thereby you are part of the very thing you appear to criticise and despise. The entire stock market is about greed. Self interested share holders. The chimp rules the stock market. It is not a socialist tool for wealth distribution. How very odd. Very odd indeed.

Well, that exporting of manufacturing to China and India to make our greenhouse gas figures improve probably didn't help the North East, or West Mids or any UK manufacturing industry actually. At least the champagne socialists can jump on the falling emissions figures, unfortunately they don't seem to see the directly associated job and skill losses nor the rising emissions in China, India and SE Asia.. They do love their cherry picking, especially when they aren't paying for it - financially and socially. Oh to have such lovely set of blinkers.

2cv. Yes, same same but different. Might be worth a revisit. Lots of promise...but that is all the stock market ha ha.
Troajan. I am all over the place with my days this past week. No, it wont move tomorrow ha ha. Tuesday could be fun though. Is it going I to the pennies and pounds or back down once the rampathon has stopped. Substance or story?

K3. I am not trying to trap you. I have never been MM's number fan. Gerard is, so far, showing the promise of a truly fantastic CEO. MM has never reached that point. 2CV, you may have got into too early. The new CEO appears to be turning g the ship at just the right time.
I want to see what MXO is going to do tomorrow. Not in it, hmmmmm.

Troajan...come on now. That adds more to my point. Does that not suggest that he may have taken on too much? It provides more for Hbobs point (which I fully agree with) that this should have had a PM on the ground running it. What we have is an excited puppy p*ssing up against every tree it comes across. Shiney ball syndrome is not a good trait MM.

If anyone wants to see how a really top CEO does business (as it stands MM looks like a fart in a bag in comparison) then check out SKIN and Mr Gerard Brandon. He even replies to investors on Twitter. MM, you have much to learn when it comes to comms, PR and building relationships/faith. Yes, I also like SKIN as a company. DYOR.

Climbing...still gaps large enough to get a couple of buses through. Just not good enough. Vague even.

Hbob. Plenty of tack and pink ha ha. Hopefully a circular bus route too.
L200. Yes I know, sadly they have all barred me :-)