Member Info for ocelot

GL brought with him the Saltfleetby project, so it looks as if JT-P was seeking a change in the company's strategy.

So when did you sell out, YL?

When the coup was orchestrated, Paul Vonk thrown out and replaced by GL?

Or when Brockham drew a blank, 5 months later?

You yourself seem to have ignored the "big red flag" for a long time, YL.

With all of your doubts, I fail to understand why you chose to remain invested for so long.

Gentlemen, just because Hawkey's gone AWOL, ...

The contributions of both of you to this board are appreciated!

WolfOfTheWoods,

YL never ceases to point the finger at JT-P, so, as I understand it, it was his non-compliance problem of early July 2018 that set off alarm bells certainly as far as YL is concerned.

So, from that point on, how did investors manage their investment in ANGS?

Back in the days when I believed management to be competent and trustworthy (more fool me).
---------------------------
But those days came to a halt with JT-P's non-compliance problem in early July 2018, as I understand it.

LLTM,

Don't want to appear harsh, but an investor is supposed to avoid being drawn in the "roller-coaster of emotions".

Management is responsible for managing the company.

But it's the investor who is responsible for managing his/her investment.

Was his/her exposure to the company a reasonable one?
Or did he/she average down and, without realising it at the time, become over-exposed?
When doubts began to arise, what action did the investor take to limit eventual losses?

Share investing is like watching a good TV drama - you get drawn in by the roller-coaster of emotions.
-----------------------------
That is precisely what you are not supposed to do, as an investor, YL.

Are you sure your loss in ANGS didn't have more to do with you than with ANGS, YL?

A little quibble with that last post of yours, YL:

to day-trade, one needs a liquid stock and a thin spread.

At the present time, ANGS is not the kind of stock to invite day-trading.

You may, of course, do as you please, YL, but, imho, management are there to manage the company and not to read your oft-repeated negative posts on this board.

30% of ANGS is only £840K at present (although, of course, you would push up the price as you bought in).

YL,
I suggested you launch a take-over bid for ANGS.
gkb47 suggested you requisition a general meeting.
These are the 2 most obvious steps you could take to do something.
But you are most definitely NOT "holding management to account" by complaining on this board all the time.

at 15:16:26 at 0.2744p

Trade of 8,726,433 shares went through recently.

As President Donald Trump faces rising disapproval of his coronavirus response, he’s reviving the heated rhetoric that got him elected -- blaming China, threatening Iran and, especially, cracking down on immigrants.

His latest volley came Wednesday in a tweet saying he’s ordered the Navy to destroy any Iranian gun boats that harass American ships at sea...

That's the danger, heavy-handed foreign policy to distract attention from domestic woes.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-22/trump-s-post-virus-2020-campaign-shaping-up-as-2016-deja-vu?srnd=premium&sref=Em01M8Hr

... the bigger problem for the shale industry is the lack of new wells being drilled. Shale wells decline by more than 60% in the first year, meaning new ones are needed to replaced production from old ones.

With few new wells coming online, IHS sees U.S. oil production declining to 10.1 million barrels a day by the end of the year, from 12.8 million barrels a day at the start. That will likely drop further to somewhere around 8.5 million barrels a day in 2021 to 2022, according to Noah Barrett, a Denver-based energy analyst at Janus Henderson.

“A good portion of production, particularly areas of the Bakken and Oklahoma, will go away completely,” said Barrett, whose employer manages $356 billion. “Fresh capital will be needed to grow off that lower base. But there’s zero appetite for that in the foreseeable future.”

... Some 1.75 million barrels a day is at immediate risk of shutting down while the number of new wells being brought online is forecast to plunge almost 90% by the end of the year, according to IHS Markit Ltd.

In short, it’s a swift and brutal end to the shale revolution, which only last year had President Donald Trump proclaiming “American Energy Dominance.” ...

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-21/historic-oil-rout-poised-to-bust-shale-trump-s-energy-dominance?srnd=premium&sref=Em01M8Hr

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-22/u-s-financial-aid-offer-to-greenland-cause-outrage-in-denmark?sref=Em01M8Hr

It's a rhetorical question.

You don't accept the explanations provided by the company and nobody on this board is better-placed than the company to respond.