RE: JRP & EBITDA4 Dec 2020 09:31
@EV_Bull
===[
The stockpiles are obviously very strategic here, it looks to me there there should be enough value there to pay off most if not all of the creditors in the JRP (which is why I don't include the stockpile in my valuations).
]===
That would be nice, but that's not the plan (and there won't be anywhere near enough value even with elevated iron ore prices). It's probably more effort than it's your worth, but the tables at the back of the JRP outline the agreed repayment plans over the life of mine for the unsecured creditors, so we don't (unless things have changed) need to be concerned about them at this point with respect of sale of iron ore from the stock piles. However the secured creditors (the banks) are presumably negotiating with us just how much of the sale of ore form the stock piles they will receive, and how much we are allowed to reinvest in the project, the remainder of their credit being paid back in later years. IMHO. DYOR. etc...
We've agreed in principle to what the banks proposed, but with rising iron ore prices perhaps one party is getting greedy! Sigh. Just sign what was agreed in principle already. Surely it was fair to both parties in the event iron ore prices went up or down from the point of agreement in principle! If not, sack the negotiators I say. LoL.