Member Info for NoelShempsky

Someone just got off the Moon ship - and they got only 0.91p.

07-Mar-22 11:04:46 0.91 300,000 Sell* 0.95 1.05 2,730 O

Anyone who has read my posts over the years will know that I like this company and that I have made a few forecasts based on the price chart, and those forecasts proved to be correct, for example, a few years ago - a double bottom reversal and more recently a breakout from a falling wedge.

At the moment, I doubt that chart analysis can give a guide to the direction for the sp. The Ukraine situation and the threat of WW3 has the markets in turmoil and that is throwing a spanner in the works as far as technical analysis is concerned.

However, I do wonder if there might be a long term pattern that runs from March 28th, 2021 to the present, and that pattern is a descending channel.

If that is the case, then, speaking as a shareholder, I am sorry to say that it indicates that 20p is on the way.

Please recall my past comment that I have stated several times, that I don't act unless the pattern is crystal clear, and this one isn't - well, to me it isn't, and so I am not selling.

So why am I posting such a useless comment when I can't make a prediction?

It is just for the record. If it does hit 20p. then I have learned a lesson, and I hope that those on here who told me that chart analysis doesn't work come to see that it does.

As I said, I'm not selling, and so I really hope that I am wrong about the descending channel and that the chart soon drops into a pattern that is clear and well defined, and it tells me that the sp will go up.

By the way - some unkind person has attacked me and called me names. I could give a list on many so-called conspiracy theories that turned out to be true, now proven to be true, but I won't bring such distraction to the board. When people instantly resort to insults and abuse, it only goes to show that they are bigots and bullies.

My point about Paul Craig Roberts and Martin Armstrong was that they are not just opinion writers. The world's top companies used to pay Martin Armstrong a lot of money to read his forecasts on stock markets, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, etc. and Paul Craig Roberts was an associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, he taught politics and economics at Washington University, I think it was, and when he was Assistant Treasury Secretary in the US government, he was the man who devised Reaganomics. They are men with eminent and glittering careers behind them, they have a great deal of knowledge and experience and they have wide networks of contacts with top people who supply them with information that you won't find anywhere else..

I don't say you have to agree with their opinions, but such men are well worth reading because they often pass on information - real facts - that the media ignore, and even if you don't agree with their opinions (I sometimes don't), reading their posts helps us to gain a more balanced view of events than just reading opinion pieces by people with whom we agree..

I ought to have posted the link to Martin Armstrong's recent article on gold, rather than the one I did post, but that one was more recent and I had that link readily to hand. Most of his posts are on finance, economics, stock markets, etc.

Thanks for your reply Seingred. I hope no one misunderstood my post and thought I was forecasting a huge rise in normal circumstances. I was talking about in the rare event of a mania - that is when things can get wild and I take on board your comment Seingred.

Someone just got off the Moon ship -

03-Mar-22 15:04:44 0.9615 500,000 Sell* 0.95 1.05 4,808 O

You think so, do you.

And one more thought - yes, the dot com boom ended in a crash - you had to know when to sell - but a gold boom won't end in a crash. The world has changed and fiat currencies are under attack. May I suggest you read Paul Craig Roberts, Martin Armstrong and others who know what's coming.

Paul Craig Roberts - formerly a member of the US government who in the 1980s and 1990s devised US economic policy, who was in the team that negotiated with Russia and who is now one of the greatest truthers. https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

Martin Armstrong - only the greatest economic forecaster of recent times. Companies paid $100,000 for each of his forecasts and world leaders used to consult him. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/world-war-iii-beginning-stages-now/

And in case you are not aware of this one - an excellent site for gold bugs - http://www.321gold.com/

That forecast of 25p might sound a bit silly, so may I just explain.

I've been in the stock market since before the dot com boom of 1999 \ 2000.

When the dot com boom came along we saw shares absolutely rocket.

I remember Knutsford Group floating. If you had bought £1,000 worth on flotation, two weeks later your shares were worth £100,000.

I'm sure that QXL.com floated at under 10p and it went to over 750p.

In a boom, a mania, it gets crazy.

I see a gold boom coming - inflation is only just taking off and it's going to get worse and there will be a flight to gold. Under those circumstances, 25p for SHG is modest. If a full-fledged mania in gold happens then we will see SHG at 900p.

... and SHG at 25p this year.

Gold at $1947, up by $38.

Will AUY jump tomorrow?

I can see this at 600p this year.

Everyone on here can see through you roly.

By the way, FLX did go to 54p, but on checking I found that it went even higher.

FLX went from 4.5p to 61.5p.

That really is a desperate attempt to worm out of your embarrassment over being so stupid. Who else on here has talked of 6M shares and 21p?

I have given you the benefit of my experience with FLX. That was mean to help you, but you failed to take it seriously and dismissed it, then resorted to insults and abuse. Now I know why - you too stupid to understand it - the menaing was lost on you.

panda - I said that we had previously had that sort of thing on here - in fact I used to post it -here is part of a post I made in November 2018 when I still believed that FLX would go up -

I wrote - "Just wait until FLX announces that it is getting a chunk of this, which I see as highly likely -

Government spokesman - "we are investing £1.9 billion to improve our cyber capabilities"

"Britain’s cyber security bolstered by world-class strategy"
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/britains-cyber-security-bolstered-by-world-class-strategy.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/567242/national_cyber_security_strategy_2016.pdf Note - "the Government alone cannot provide for all aspects of the nation’s cyber security" - page 13."

I made many posts talking of how the prospects looked good for cyber security firms.

You see - I was a big bull on this share, until I learned the hard way that FK1 is always right.

Roly made to look a fool again. His posts make him look a fool and the sp makes him look a fool.

What 's your game roly - is this some sneaky trick to try to discredit me or are you just plain stupid.

I didn't say I sold 6M shares at 21p. Read what I wrote - "years previous to my last foray" - my last foray being the one when I accumulated 6M shares.

The sale at 21p was in my earlier foray into FLX. I sold them, then after FLX fell back from that high of 54p, I bought back in and it was then that I eventually accumulated 6 M shares. You are are either a brainless oaf who can't understand what you read or you are a piece of lowlife who tries to use misinformation and lies to discredit people.

I forgot to say - panda, it was those theoretical reasons that caused me to buy into FLX and buy more and keep adding until I had a very large holding. Well, those reasons plus the fact that years previous to my last foray, I had bought in at 4.5p, kept buying more all the way up as it rose to 15p. When it then jumped to 21p I sold. It went on to 54p.

So, there were theoretical reasons for buying, plus, having sen it at 54p, I was confident that it could jump very high.

It didn't. It went down and down and I came to see that FK1 was always right.

Sorry to tell you panda, that in the past, many times we've heard this sort of theoretical reason for buying FLX. It never stopped the decline in the sp.

Ignore FK1 at your peril. For years, his forecasts for the sp have been correct while the others were wrong.

I agree about the bumper dividend being likely. I can see this being 800p before very long.

Showing strength today - up by 3.5p, 8.24%.

This board is full of mouthpieces who post "analysis" but it is a load of rubbish. When have they ever been right?