RE: Decision revoking the European patent12 May 2023 17:28
Hi Leycrjb
Thanks you for the ChatGPT posts, really interesting. I tried it on Bing and then went on the ChatGPT Open AI website. I asked it one of the questions you asked on the Free Plan bot:
Why would the claimant file a particulars of infringement after a consent order?
"The claimant may file particulars of infringement after a consent order to provide detailed information and evidence regarding the alleged infringement. This helps clarify the specific nature and extent of the infringement, ensuring that both parties have a clear understanding of the claims and facilitating compliance with the terms outlined in the consent order."
Which site did you use when posing that question? I see there is a Plus Plan bot which costs $20 a month.
This was the reply on Bing:
"A consent order is a judgment or order made by the court but the terms have been agreed in advance by the parties. Depending on the scope of the consent order or judgment and whether any of the parties are a litigant in person, the court may enter and seal them. Otherwise court approval is required. If one or both parties breach a consent order by failing to carry out obligations such as paying maintenance, then the order can be enforced. Because consent orders are made by the Court (a judge’s decision), breach of one is effectively a breach of a court order - something that courts look very unfavorably upon. I couldn’t find any information on why a claimant would file particulars of infringement after a consent order. Could you please provide more context?"