Member Info for NoCheddar

Hi Darton,

Cenkos issued a broker note last week. You can sign up for free to the Cenkos Research Portal and gain access to all the notes on CNC:

https://www.cenkos.com/research-portal/#/portal/cenkos-securities

On CNC's website there is a slide deck presentation to investors which shows the strategy and growth plans in detail:

https://www.gocct.com/investors/

This webinar with the CEO and CFO has plenty to chew on:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-js0OUYuFs&ab_channel=ConcurrentTechnologiesPlc

Morning Victor,

What does that mean?

Hey Lucretius,

That was a rollicking read!!

Loved the bit on Connie Penn!!

Thank you

Lucretius,

Cheers!

Must have been fascinating to watch.

Do you have any thoughts on why Sycurio have gone all the way? From what I can see, no one at the top team is deeply experienced in PCI DSS and payments. Counsel joined months before the case against PCIP was launched. It looks like an act of self harm.

Hi Lucretius

That was an interesting read - thank you!

Were you the only shareholder present?

What did you think of Guy Tritton?

Kindest

Simon

From a Joint Status Report submitted to the American court 20th June, 2023:

3. The trial in the U.K. Matter was originally scheduled to be completed by June 16,

2023, but is now scheduled for completion of closing arguments on June 23, 2023. Thereafter, the U.K. Court is expected to render its final ruling in the U.K. Matter by the end of July, 2023.

4. The Parties respectfully notify the Court they can be prepared for the Markman

Hearing in this matter at the Court’s convenience beginning July 12, 2023 and upon reasonable notice to allow for U.K.-based client personnel to arrange necessary travel accommodations.

Https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/41847299/Semafone_Limited,_et_al_v_PCI_Pal_US_Inc

Defo looks that way. No email at 6pm from Caseboard.

Going by looking at the historic cases on Caseboard the next filing will be Order by Judge.

Any thoughts on what is cooking in America right now:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/41847299/Semafone_Limited,_et_al_v_PCI_Pal_US_Inc

Does the judge now rule on the Claim Construction?

Anyone going to attend the court case in person over the next week?

I can't make it. My brother might pop in. How about you?

I emailed the Patent Court about the trial, here's the response - 22/5/23:

Dear Mr Gordon

The trial will be in person and will start on the 12 June.

As to attending the trial in person, you may of course do this, but if proceedings go into private, you will be asked to leave and will be able to return when informed to do so.

Regards

Pauline Drewett

Clerk to The Hon. Mr Justice Meade

What is a pre trial review in a UK patent court?

ChatGPT

In the context of UK patent court proceedings, a Pre-Trial Review (PTR) is a procedural step that takes place before a patent trial. It is a court hearing where the judge or master reviews and manages the case to ensure that it is ready for trial. The purpose of the PTR is to streamline the trial process, address any preliminary issues, and promote settlement discussions between the parties. During the PTR, the judge may consider various matters such as case management, disclosure of evidence, expert witnesses, legal arguments, and any other relevant issues that need to be resolved before the trial begins.

Can a patent case go to trial without a pre trial review?

ChatGPT

Yes, it is possible for a patent case to proceed to trial without a Pre-Trial Review (PTR) in the UK. The PTR is a procedural step designed to ensure the case is ready for trial and to address preliminary issues. However, in certain circumstances, the parties may agree to waive the PTR or the court may determine that a PTR is not necessary based on the specific circumstances of the case. In such situations, the case can proceed directly to trial without undergoing a separate PTR.

Thank you sharing your view! Makes complete sense!

Okay dokey. Got you. You've paid up for the filings?!

It looks like it's going to trial in three weeks, is that what you are reading from the filings?

Cheers!

That one didn't have the word Consent in it.

This historic case had a Consent Order in the timeline - 17/3/21 - and it went to trial:

Https://caseboard.io/cases/0f72853f-845e-45b3-9935-ec36ce5640a9

There have been two filings since the Consent Order filing. With all the court action America running in tandem it doesn't look like an agreement has been made.

Victor,

Thank you for all your posting. I look forward to reading your posts again when you return,

Xx

Victor,

You are a man of riddles.

Kindest

Simon

Are you deducing that Guy Tritton brought in Nick Philpot to join PCIP in challenging Sycurio's patent at the EPO?

Can you deduce if there is a connection between the challenged patents to the GB patent?

Cheers Victor! After I posted I had a look at the document and saw the connection. You'd think ECK wouldn't get involved in the EPO case unless they thought it had some connection to the GB patent. What do you think?