Member Info for nlondon1234

It's a long term hold with very little if any diultion.Rather boring perhaps until Californian gambling legislation gets going but some of the most boring shares can be the best.See you all next year!! lol

I view nanoco as a special situation investment case and there are plenty of instituional funds and investors who are interested in this type of investment with greater research facilities than us.Even though some long term holders here know a lot about the company, which i am gateful for.So basically what i'm saying is who knows where the share price goes tomorrow but i reckon it will be driven by professional money.

Someone's willing to buy and not many sellers.I doubt it's retail as this isn't a popular retail share.You just have to look at this bulletin board.

True.Good, although predictable run of the mill rns.I'll bet that California gambling isn't going away and going to be forgotten as there's too much extra revenue and profit on the table for all parties.So i guess it's back to waiting for those who still believe.

Acquisition happened recently.

Imo if you ran a hedgefund.. the 1st or 2nd employee you would have to be an extremely experienced legal eagle or 2 or 3 in the particular jurisdiction (!).. after someone who was an expert on the balance sheet obviously.So much important detail regarding whether a company, say risking bankruptcy, is in the legals covenants etc.., whether a company makes money on a contract and so many other things.Anyway i'll definitely be interested to see how it goes.

They must be block trades done between different institutions off market then reported.Otherwise we would be either 50% down or up at least surely!It's always weird when those happen as i'm always wondering what does somebody think that the other doesn't.I guess there can be multiple reasons as different funds have lots of different rules about investments and investment levels.

Not invested but the volume here both retail and institutional was always rubbish even for small caps to be fair.For some reason nobody much seemed interested in buying and/or trading.
I'm wondering just out of curiousity right now whether anyone can clear up if they get the financing (probably from private equity in this macro market?), whether they can compulsorily buy the shares that aren't tendered if enough people tender % wise.Similarly to other takeovers pretty much.

Problem is you don't know what the past 2 governments are going to do with any predictability.One minute its one thing, the nest its the complete opposite or something totally different policy wise.Algorithms probably confused too.

Probably shorters gien free rein again as the exact quantum and length of the potential revised O&G windfall tax isn't known yet.Ithaca's up 2% and harbour's down 2% though.Goldman were tasked with supporting the price , at least yesterday.

Seems like Goldman got a pretty sweet price for them as i read they were angling for 2-3 billion.Just gotta hope the uk government don't stuff up north sea opportunities.Good to have some new listed cos that aren't 'growth' with more than a few decent ones having been snapped up this year.

Some listed companies i look at and do wonder why the heck they are valued so highly and others pretty much ignored but there you go.I guess everyone has an opinion, especially during the last year of the bull run market and in particular Ms. Cathy Woods.

A bit of movement anyway.Wte could be a sleeping giant.Who knows eh?That's a market!

A lot of the luxury 'houses' such as LVMH, Hermes, etc.. are still posting good numbers.Perhaps the coming recession and continued covid lockdowns in China and property market problems there etc.. will affect their numbers sometime, but it doesn't seem like the time is yet.Some luxury 'houses' are already pivoting/diversifying moreso away from China.It does seems people in the market for hermes bags, rolexes & little slinky Chanel numbers aren't too affected so far, wherever in the world they are.I guess that isn't too surprising as a doubling of leccy bills from 2-3 grand to 4-6 or whatever won't make much difference if you're usually in the market for a 10 grand watch or bag.

If it is like in the UK surely by sometime tomorrow.However, listening to an admittedly very pro-Trump supporting lawyer chatting on lbc... due to mail in votes etc.. it could take time.. well he mentioned weeks especially in California.

Although, perhaps a bit longer than tomorrow, even with counting all night, due to different ballots and votes going on simulataneously.California population is 39.24 million out of circa 332 million yanks.So a little less than uk pop, but illustrates why Cali will continue to be a battleground for gambling stakeholders still.

Anyway gla still etc...It ain't over til the fat bird sings.You never know!What do you think it will open up at if 1 prop passed?

Agreed for now Garry.Well Boris and his levelling up agenda & Truss & Kwarteng's big growth plans have surely been put on the backburner for a few years at least i'm guessing, reading around predictions for rates rises/maintenance.However, perhaps just wrong time, wrong place.However, big that mistake was.
Although to fair in the US spending looks like it might have hit on a ceiling for a bit, if the Republicans win in the upcoming.They have had the massive inflation reduction, hmm..!, and chip acts already though.

My read through from online commentary is if both fail , big online players will be forced to concede more to the tribes to get this working as, as far as i can work out the new big players in the market like Draftkings won't be willing to let this market go.I mean they have already spent a fortune on their advertising campaign.I guess back to the drawing board for them, but it will be a lot of work so no doubt we might hear about it before the next ballot hopefully.
Also i am assuming the tribes now will be definitely wanting more of this new market as opposed to spending and coming up with their proposition as more of a defensive move so far.There is sure alot of money on the table in California.
It will be interesting to see what our ceo says and to keep updated on what's happening even if disappointing in the short term.

Leading aiports Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester and Virgin Atlantic and British Airways wrote.CFDs are needed apparently otherwise folk will go elsewhere, US and EU to get their SAF.
DfT spokesperson said they already have a programme for SAF production which is one of the most comprehensive in the world.
Seems like it could be a stalemate based on costs for vls at the moment.

If it becomes more profitable in the meanwhile, surely it might deserve a bit of an boost as mcap is tiny.Anyway here's hoping that some good luck and something outta the blue comes the company's way!

The brilliant thing is it's not one of those companies that need huge amounts of shareholders' money and dilution every year to be able to carry on.

For anything above 0.5% short WOSG : https://www.shorttracker.co.uk/company/GB00BJDQQ870/
WOSG isn't shorted significantly and you can't always tell why a particular fund is short.