Member Info for NikeAir180

21:21: I know you don't.

Re. 21:56: Laura, your final sentence is false, your first sentence is incorrect, your middle sentence is not strong on fact - in my opinion.

As said on the Equipment was on site... thread, the segmental analysis was up to June 30th 2024, equipment that was paid for was detailed on 06/11/24, arrived in Ougadougou as per RNS of 18/12/24, Chairman's statement introducing 13/12/24 annual report, stated the equipment (relevant to November 2024 RNS') got on to site, a logical interpretation would be that coincided with a day between 18/11/24 and 13/12/24.

... contained a segmental analysis for details up to 30th June 2024...

The 13/12/24 annual report referred to at 18:05 contained a segmental analysis for detatais up to 30th June 2024, the RNS explaining which equipment had been paid for was on 06/11/24 then there was an RNS on 18/11/24.explaining team.and equipment were in Ougadougou. In the Charman's statement introducing the annual report on 13/11/24, he explained that with regard to Faso Greenstone, equipment had got on to site - chronologically that would be some time between and inclusive of 18/11/24 and 13/12/24.

18:05 Penultimate sentence by Banbury - utterly false.

Re. 18:07: second sentence is wrong, first sentence: how things actually seem to you is how they seem, it does not not bot(her) me.

17:43: Much less than that Aimdogs, have just checked, you have always been wrong when you have tried various percentages of that put down when aimed at myself - in any case that is none of your business and presented supposition by you is rude.

Zumore, you left out: "the detailed critique of the the gold prospects" from 10:15 which was referring back to 11:12 post on the Gold thread - 11/04/25.

Banbury conflated at 10:31 on this thread and that is why the second and third sentences of the 10:31 post were nonsense.

... it afterwards... 😎

It would have been easier to correct the detail of the 10:31 post, before posting and then claim it as such if you were Banbury but is more difficult to reclaim if afterwards, with a correction when you are Zumore.

You can read it and interpret it as you choose but, based on the above distinction and chronology, your presented interpretation at 16:21 is not worthy of my agreement.

Not a slight mistake because of the next sentence that followed which rendered -sentences two and three of the 10:31 post as nonsense.

Re. 10:09: Adaptation of plan and type of equipment as per 07/10/24 RNS. 06/11/24 RNS details equipment that has been paid for. 18/11/24 RNS - team and equipment arrived in Ougadougou.

Nonsense by Banbury at 10:31 - the second sentence has nothing to do with the RNS from the link as it wasn't regarding the same country for which he claimed annual costs.

00:07: If the CFO has helped the company be able to put out an annual report on 13/12/24 and an interim half-year report on 31/03/25 - that is some of what he has done - well done.

... as deeply on long term matters...

21:02: "The study, based on mew methods of polling, that questioned participants" (from approximare memory) you are are a bit hasty to identify a trend there Banbury. Eventually when people do vote in elections, some of them will consider more than just the questions that were put in many polls.

What is happening during recent weeks and next few months may or may not be amenable to various shareholders of companies and various commentators but some of them might not be thinking as deppeply on lon Kong term matters - which is not to place the majority of correctness on a ny particular ebb and flow but some of the flux may not be as gloomy as some people think, flux may not be a weakness, it might be a way to a better future after shared effort followed by shared participation with nice dissemination, time will tell. 🌕

Steel: you still go hypey in your negativism towards opinions or stances you do not like, on occasion, Banbury, slightly unhinged from reality in aspect and detached from sensitive timing.

Re. 21:08: Just as one may not be inclined to gloat anyway, at no point did the previous relevant exchanges seem to motivate that - even if one was so inclined.

... spelt .. 😄 💤