Member Info for NigelHaemoglobin

Thanks Jimmy, understood. Oz(strich) naff off back to fruitlessly staring at pixellated satellite imagery, a total distraction which appears deliberate.

34% gcos plus a wafer thin increase thanks to the vegan mud smoothie (does it definitely exist at MOU-3 ???)

Did PRD approach the local populace in relation to the expropriation of water? ESG? ESG is now part of standard corporate policies which PG has 'gassed' on about a lot. Correct?.

Maybe they didn't my dear chap who can almost write in the English language. I would suggest that several contingencies have been neglected but that would be opinion only...

Realist and a sceptic, only rude to those so raving and delusional that they believe that Charlotte, Tom and I are in cahoots, totally gibbering nonsense.

Where is the water coming from for the sandjet gadget? Bit of a shortage in that area of Morocco...

Partially correct PoC but the PMRS 2018 manual changed everything, reserves may only be booked when full project funding is agreed.

C2? Interesting topic, there is a huge spectrum of qualitative analysis. Sea Lion for example is fully appraised with multiple wells however RKH's mantra 'resources to reserves' has not been possible due to the 2018 criteria change.

At the other end of the spectrum we have Guercif, one recent well to TD but awaiting testing for b****y ages with C2 booked on the basis of one very old well, 2D historic seismic and MOU-1.

I bet there was plenty of discussion about categorising the reservoir, we really know very little about it.

"You cannot reason someone out of something he or she was not reasoned into".

Applicable to most of you...

PoC you have no evidence of such a deal, nor should you read too much into the arrival of new major shareholders. I'm not going to publish my views on the strategy of new major shareholders, it is erroneous in my opinion to develop a mindset that they know something which P.I's do not.

Absolutely agree Mamms, I'm up for a wee punt on the unfolding scenario. The key strength for LOGP is no carry has been agreed or is indeed necessary given the loss of the licensing option so the company could settle for 30 mil STG which would indicate a related settlement for BEY of 120 mil. If Ryan was not a half wit watermelon they would settle in 12-24 months (v diff to call the timing) or be absolutely hammered by the ECT with a bit of luck. That is a four to five year time horizon though.

Ah fine, my pithy wee post is entirely accurate, go for a lie down, stress clearly getting you down...

Quite amusing seeing JA being brought up (so to speak) TRP have delivered a terrific 97% loss to holders over just five years! Not many holders living in Monaco...

Hello, someone has matched my punt!

Indeed, gradually GKP had to relinquish acreage before the final PI extermination.

Spidymonkey's schoolboy NAV calculator became shorter and shorter before...pooooof, gone. So did the strangely delusional website with a paywall 'advising' the rather emotional tribe of PI's how to mire themselves in over leveraged instruments.

Quite a useful historical exercise to follow the whole dogpile from conception to crucifixion.

Garbled fine if that is what you think but RKH have contiguous acreage with analogue prospects and plays.

One or two on here though who blatantly spin RNS news to the upside, typical behaviour, happens constantly over at nutty old Predator and their merry band of sycophants...

Well I'm not going to even try to assess the geopolitics of this region, have a reasonable handle on MENA, South America, Eire etc. I have built up a pure punt of 5 mil shares/0.1 average that Chuditch attracts a deal. Boil's performance or rather the operator's NS outcomes have been poor.

Just a punt, all I would add is Dr Butler who has essentially shaped Baron over all these years before retiring is a thoroughly decent and straightforwards sort of chap, rare in mini-oilers...

For clarity and taking it as a given that your BB leaders have never called a funding...my call is that a cash call could be bonds (aarrgh) CLN's (more aaargh), a creative placing or a new prospectus. To be absolutely honest (unlike a few here) I do not understand the rules of issuing a new prospectus.

Either way, are we happy that the balance sheet is healthy or not? Hartlepool, remain where you are.

PoC at least learn to read RNS news? Bit odd frankly.

Either way I remain confident of a very strong week indeed.

To be fair re my speculative call there is a limit to how far the share issue rules can be interpreted. It's really up to you guys how to play the game and I wish you all good fortune: courage should be respected.

Agree, cracking run up to the close, with a cheeky bear trap earlier.

Why would I do a whoopsy turkey balls? Watching at the moment.

Silly person.