Member Info for NigelHaemoglobin

Fairly typical response, a few paragraphs on a complex and grey area (hence why we have the legal profession) and a full dummy spitting episode is evoked. Paranoia too, why on earth would a chap want to 'scare' someone into selling?

Literally batsh*t mad.

Anth you are clearly a very emotional person, nothing wrong with that but for you to dismiss a very complex picture with a simple 'No'.

What I discovered yesterday is a very complex relationship between His Majesty, his Privy Council, the Judicial Committee (populated with Supreme Court judges), the legislature, Crown powers and recent cases which have set precedents.

I do not know what the answer is however GeldSchmidts speech was really about UKEF. In the RKH case it was glaringly obvious that UKEF support would not be given. I jettisoned ALL my shares and bought them back, now reduced again.

Still have a tiny exposure to the FI but that is it.

Incidentally and writing as a (not very good) investor I have learned the hard way to evaluate as many negative scenarios as possible.

Good effort Phil but you at least ought to know that final decisions in regard to the law are the responsibility of the tiered court system. A few examples straight from memory.

UKOG, Horse Hill. Terminated.

Island Magee Energy, court of appeal negated a licence issued by the First Minister of Stormont. So it made no difference that a senior politician (think Mr Goldsmith) made a statement, no doubt prepared and checked for him.

Boris Johnson, prorogued parliament but Mrs Remoaner won her case against HMG in the court system. ALL the MP's had to put their rent boys, bottles or copies of the Socialist Worker down and slime back into the swamp. So the Prime Minister had his decision squashed by HMCTS.

More amusingly, a fish and chip shop owner from Billericay took his private land parking ticket all the way to the Supreme Court, lost. That set a precedent for the list of outfits run by little gitweasels who occasionally catch we, the motorists, out.

Phil, Gus

My point is that subjects and organisations have ultimate recourse to a court, based in London, staffed by existing members of the Supreme Court Judiciary.

Answers in the house are not religious edicts, Lord Goldsmith has form...all legislation can be tested by law. This is how the separation of the legislature, judiciary and Crown powers function in our society.

No subject in the Overseas Territories is marooned from the mother ship.

Let's hope the Sand Heath Jet Robinson works, I rather suspect that it is working well.

If there was any doubt surely PRD would have raised before testing?

In that sense you have good reason to be positive I suppose.

Phil the Overseas Territories are in sub-groups but all, as far as I know, while self governing are not mini nations but have legal recourse to the equivalent of our home Supreme Court: in fact the Judicial Committee consists of selected Supreme Court judges, in most cases three judges but in certain cases five.

As I wrote, it is not certain if a precedent set by the home Supreme Court is applicable to the Overseas Territories.

Don't think it would be too hard to research but unfortunately we have a hard left government installed now so any parliamentary questions 'late last year' are irrelevant.

Finally the pieces may be coming together???

Solve this problem, can a judgement by the Supreme Court create a precedent for the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council? If so then the Horse Hill madness could jeopardise the Navitas EIS as, to the best of my knowledge, that document does not include a calculation of the totality of CO2 production.

If RKH have problems then surely BOR is toast? Down to a micro punt in both.

History must be problematic for you old horse, the Allies actually won World War 2, are you aware of that? Unfortunately for you and other similar types, Röhm for example: no wait he was eliminated in 1934. Anyway me old nag the Nazis lost the war and all of the euthanasia camps were closed.

Must be difficult for you...

We don't know if has been effective yet rosso. I suspect that it is working but no evidence in the sp yet. Mini E and P's are usually leaky, sp stagnation during ops normally equates to failure but I am genuinely uncertain this time.

Not so classy, think I missed a definite article. Then again I prefer logic and physics to English grammar...

You see my old pony for over a year now it has been veterinary euthanasia for bearish opinions and now it is that we have escaped from Broadmoor.

Do you think the Allies fought the wrong enemy in WW2?

This Sandjet kit, looks a bit 'Heath Robinson' from the vids. Let's wait and see what the results are.

On a positive note the company are very positive, if they were not reasonably happy that it would work they would have raised by now. In that sense conditional congrats to them.

Harry

As far as I'm concerned all negative views are welcome, not one of us can definitively prove that the ideal outcome will play out, that includes the directors.

What we do not require on this board is crawling, slimy and frankly emetic obsequiousness to a few BB gurus and the directors in the style of the (dreadful) PRD board.

There, if you step out of line one wacko McNeurone threatens you with veterinary euthanasia! Straight from Heydrich's textbook!

How much do you all think 6,176 scf/d of helium is worth? How many litres of liquid Helium is that? How much do you think it would cost to install and operate a liquefaction plant?

You do know where the well is right? A LOT of palms to grease.

Now do you see why your SP has continuously tanked? What do you do with 20,000 barrels of possibly contaminated water?

Turnip Bob has one boring mantra...

'All three projects will come to fruition'. No context, no placing calls, no downside risk evaluation.

Just endless lard fuelled twaddle.

Doubt it but it doesn't matter. Char arrived relatively recently, announced a discovery without the type of obfuscation commonplace amongst E and P small caps, have a SUPERB partner.

All of the above and more mean CREDIBILITY, a vital yet difficult to quantify attribute.

If Char are not above 20p by December I will take a three month sabbatical. DYOR!

It's actually sad Porters isn't it? I mean to observe cognitive decline. First it was a profound delusion that several were working on concert, then it was inchoate anger after the inevitable (and correctly called dilutions by myself). Following that the specimen latched onto a social media guru with a past...now he has reverted to endless calls for mass veterinary euthanasia. In fact he carps on about the very same thing constantly.

Quite ill to be honest.

I doubt that there will be many new O&G developments in 20 years: certainly a select few mainly for aviation and shipping.