Member Info for NigelHaemoglobin

Ralph, yes you are mainly right. To be seen as a disrupter and antagonist of the EU also served her politically. On a positive note news could resurrect this parrot. Over at Bloe we had an absolute belter on Apr 1 and I managed a first entry >6p.

Important not to fixate imo.

Its a neologism, much like 'Brexit' but with two extra consonants.

If ardent Brexshitters like Jim Ratcliffe who is about to scuttle off sideways to Monaco, put a billion of his tax savings into sport and music projects to support our youth or invested in green cities from an endowment, had one ounce of social leadership then I would respect them.

Dyson you W****R, let the electric car be produced here. Brexshitter! All bull with no patriotism!! Affects Rockhopper and my remnant holding as well.

More than halved, right after the AGM.

Margaret was pro Europe, don't forget just how business orientated she was. The Channel Tunnel was her project.

What the Brits have forgotten is just what a state the country was in during the 1970's and the pivotal role of the EC/EU in helping us climb out of Socialism. Airbus is a brilliant example, 100,000 quality jobs just in the UK. Airbus will be fine in GB until a brand new type is designed. Then it is a 'British Steel' job for Broughton and their sub equipment suppliers.

Once Brexshitted we, the for the moment, United Kingdom, will require trade deals individually negotiated with many countries.

This will include Italy. Bilateral trade with Italy stands at £27 BILLION which is of course tariff free until Brexshit day. Read Derek Robinson's book Why 1914? Enjoy the complexity of pre WW1 Europe.

It is the role of an intermediary company to underwrite this process surely?

And although my buying strategy is very patient there is significant upside remaining, provided that we retain a modest amount of drillbit fortune as we develop shut in oilfields.

Look at British Steel.

Raw material costs UP due Brexit (see exchange rate damage on June 17, 2016
Carbon trading offset harmed by imminent Brexit
Required investment not possible due reduced revenue due above and Brexit related uncertainty.
Cheaper imported steel.

I wonder how many people in Scunthorpe voted for Brexshit? Do they not realise that its not just the 4000 employees and the 21000 supplier employees but that the very FABRIC OF THEIR NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE SOCIETY AND ECONOMY DEPENDED ON BRITISH STEEL.

It was about 70% leave by the way. Why do people in Britain reject their own wealth?

Suresh I literally (ok very nearly) spat my coffee out. After all these years posting had you literally NO IDEA how critical politics and international relations are to The Falklands?

Politics affects everything of course but is THE priority factor in the FI, along with a list of solvable issues related to opening a new province.

Ovets the centre right and further right vote in the UK is being carved up. This is why Mrs slightlyhypoglycaemic is so desperate to put Meaningful Vote 4 (amended variant) through ASAP.

We are at GRAVE RISK of five years or more of a hard left/Marxist administration. They rightly fear the military as their ultimate allegiance is to the Crown and not Parliament. Therefore they will reduce it, so would the Greens but their values are in many ways radically different from Labour.

Look, forget oil, it’s more productive to understand politics and international relations.

How much reading? Without understanding international relations and trade treaty negotiation no one has a hope of making investment decisions. By alll means do your own research but apply the due diligence of higher authorities.

Sam said it! Banks will not supply money to the project until HM govt have undertaken due diligence. Think about it, that is many levels of evaluating risk.

UKEF carry out an exercise across the totality of government.
The banks carry out sophisticated and costly due diligence.
PMO and RKH examine political risk.
The institutional holders do independent risk analysis.

It does clearly state in the AIM documentation who these shares are suitable for.

I’m happy enough to roll with the RNS guidance, the official source however: it’s worth tuning in to interviews and AGM peeformances etc. Using pure verbal reasoning Sea7 could make the deduction that the well is shut in.

I do not agree with Sea7 but as someone who believes in free speech I don’t really care what he says. The thing is, we don’t have the First Amendment in Britain.

It’s flowing, that is what I believe. If not, very naughty for not updating us.

sabyam yes I concur. The main thing actually is never to suspend your disbelief when interacting with an O and G company at any level. Actually I think the odds are slightly better than evens but not expecting a large sum.

Yes it is. A few weeks ago I posted what that flow rate would mean in terms of flow velocity. Just a rough calc, no compressibility/fluid dynamics type stuff. Over 400 mph!

What was the tipping point FI. sticking with Arg/Bor?

Nevertheless I am happy to believe that the guidance contained in the mid April rns is correct ie:

“16aZ continues to flow strongly, going from strength to strength with a steady increase in pressure as the well cleans up.”

Interesting interview, couple of points. PH stated 1000 bpd on 1/8th choke, surely it is 700 bpd. He also inferred that the longer term stable production rate will be around 700 bpd. Sea7 is correct re inferring that the well might be shut in based on pure verbal reasoning.

Trying to make sense of these anomalies, if an RNS appears stating that the well was shut in for weeks then yes, an omission. Not a grave one but the general consensus here is that the company is hugely cashflow positive.

I give up, these phone keypads way to small. Sorry.

Well is Sea is, excuse me, a tad annoying to some, he is on the right track. Its virtually impossible in AIM to build a safe position without trading.

Well is Sea is, excuse me, a tad annoying to some, he is on the right track. Its virtually impossible in AIM to build a safe position without trading. Look at the gloom pervading these boards!

continues...

similar with equivalent chances of success of say 35%. How would you calculate a fee? Would you not add on a very healthy premium? In that sense it does not follow that the case is of minimal risk of not succeeding.

I would agree with you in the sense that there would be little point in taking on a case with a very low chance of success on a NWNF basis.