Member Info for NGR1616

Deluded

They are committed to lining their own pockets.

The response is inaccurate as well and contains many falsehoods.

This place has gone to the dogs recently so I agree with you it’s hard to know who to trust or believe but I look in the mirror and have a clear conscience when I see the face that looks back. Not sure everyone here can say that .

Well I don’t expect you to take me at my word, but I have only one ID and have never posted on ADVFN.

Troublesome you're on the wrong side of this argument. TooDim2seeit I can understand but you; I have a far higher opinion of.....

He also prattles on about everything else that was addressed in the circular call today.....maybe if stamps his feet harder tomorrow he'll dupe a few more muppets into his conspiracy world.

Further more

"ARG is the operating company with employees that conducts all licensing business directly or through

its 100+ subsidiaries. ACTG has no employees and is a public vehicle for stock trading based on

ARG’s business and performance. The relationship appears similar between Nanoco Technologies

Ltd and Nanoco Group Plc (LSE:NANO). His initial titles as of 01/05 were EVP of ACTG and EVP of

ARG (then named Acacia Technologies Group, “ATG”). In two years, he became the highest paid

executive in ACTG and ARG combined ($1.9M vs. ACTG CEO’s $788K) and remained so for most of

his tenure (increasing to $3.76M). From 2010 to 2012, he served as the CEO of ARG. Whilst he was

not a board member of ACTG, he was a board member of ARG and most of its 100+ subsidiaries."

Sounds like he'll want a few quid in his pay packet

TH today in response to the circular

"The board paints CTO Nigel Pickett as the messiah and threatens that his departure would cause

enormous damage to the company. This is another blatantly misleading statement. The 30/3/20 RNS

announcing non-renewal of Pickett's employment had no effect on the share price, and conversely the

24/03/21 RNS announcing Pickett’s new employment agreement had no effect on the share price"

quite possibly because sensible people knew what was happening in this regard so no need to panic or create an alternative narrative.

Very significant.....

BT said it today

He also told you the settlement was $150m gross and not the "measly" amount being discussed.

It is a significant settlement

The board took advice had the litigation continued and took the prudent decision for the security of the company to

to compromise and accept what was proposed. But this is never going to be acceptable to you because you can only see $250+ and ignore everything else around it. It's pathetic.

TooDense2beReal proving just that.

Nothing in it came as a surprise to me since it matches everything I've been saying for long enough. You should be asking the same question to yourself along with why are we wasting the boards time with this charade?

I work for a NYSE listed company and we can't issued anything publicly without prior legal approval. The suggestion that Nanoco are acting illegally in it's various communications is frankly absurd as their lawyers simply wouldn't allow it. Instead of understanding this disgruntled investors have listened to the people with the loudest voices without hearing the constructed lies or understanding the motives behind it.....a takeover by stealth - threaten me with legal action for saying it but go after BT first as he just said so publicly. If they get control of the cash I'm pretty sure it's lining their pockets first that will be the priority.

You mean the press didn't admit they got it wrong too?

What is fair value? Did people factor in compromise? BT always said he's accept a seeltement that was fair and clearly with the backdrop of appeals and risk that was the case. Sadly many people likely didnt consider this. I clearly recall him making the statement that Nanoco's preferred outcome was a negotiated settlement and that at the time to me that meant a significantly lower value than the potential award at trial.

No settlement bonus.....oh I'm bored already posting the errors and falsehoods.

Eddleman wasn't paid $1m.

Here's your chance PPE - to make a compete fool of yourself....

Https://www.lifeslittlesweets.com/grilled-cucumber/

I've never seen so many teddies thrown out the cot. You must have been a difficult child who has a tantrum when your dummy was taken from you by mummy when you were 5. Who'd have thought you'd morph into one.

I'm so looking forward to the next few days and weeks to watch the continued drama come to a disappointing end for you when everything that is clear to most starts to dawn on the slow learners. No dramas mate as they say down under.

Aye whatever