Member Info for NGR1616

Unless you are an M&M [sic] you'd be better not make guesses. Your boasting yesterday just melted in your hand....

BC I see siloed behaviours all the time in my industry and new tech is often shunned in favour of the known entity even if the former is slower, more cumbersome and ultimately more expensive. Often because the ‘users’ or ‘buyers’ can’t adapt or don’t have the self confidence to move away from what they know so well; job protection almost. It’s really quite frustrating.

Conversely there are other organisations that actively seek out new technology to improve efficiency, reduce CO2 and reduce costs so there are opportunities.

In my opinion, cheap SWIR sensors are not a replacement for something existing already. We are not going to be trying to encourage companies to swap from one technology to another, simply to add the technology to augment what is already in use. Yes there are InGaAs SWIR sensors available but at the price they’ll never become ubiquitous in consumer devices or wearables and are restricted to industrial applications such as Machine Vision, Imaging, Medical and Aerospace/Defense. This new generation of CMOS will gat much wider adoption in my view.

That’s why I described SWIR CMOS tech that STM are developing and others will follow I think will be a new fad but one that stays the course. I believe these sensors will have so many applications you will hear the phrase ‘SWIR enabled’ on product launches and advertising.

It’s definitely a bullish engulfing trend with three white soldiers and a partridge in a pear tree

The number of buyers must have exceeded the sellers and the puts took the brunt of it

Clearly some shorts closing

What about the side order the was covered by the MM’s?

“Massive buy going on here yet to print”

Says who? Unless you are the massive ‘buyer’ or you are aware first hand of the massive buys then you’re talking absolute rubbish.

I welcome new posters. But how about we calm the jets down from TOGA and be a little more measured?

I'm not being negative. I hold a decent number of shares and I want to protect my investment and if anyone is posting negatively in a manner I disagree with I'll counter that narrative. But the same goes for ramping. It's not helpful to the investment and undermines the good research and considered posts here over the years.

On the whole, it should be left for others to do their own research and in the meantime allow the BoD to run the company, If you don't like the BoD vote them out or sell your shares. I'm happy with their performance of late in a difficult early adoption market where the hope is the tech becomes ubiquitous in our daily lives but let us be honest......no amount of ramping here is going to alter the device OEM's decision (display or sensor or other applications) to incorporate Nanoco dots and increase revenue and profit which is the only way the company will increase in value and the SP rise in tandem.

“The one bloke…. “

Hardly reassuring taking advice from someone who has only a basic grasp of the English language.

I know who the new non-executive directors are because it was discussed before and I did my own research. What I didn’t do is keep going on and on about it.

And I told you already I’ve made money here thanks.

Would never frequent a spoons before of after Brexit.

You posted this

"Big exec names arriving and maybe just maybe a confirmed name drop of where the tech is being used"

They are not Execs. And please explain what the rest of the drivel should be taken as other than a ramp?

Daz i really don’t see the point in coming on here trying to convince those who’ve been here for in many cases over 10+ years you can influence matters by regurgitating existing common knowledge. You’re making a little dick if yourself. You’d be better pumping it elsewhere to attract new investment but make sure you tell them to DYOR (deep research like you), but then to shut the fk up about it when they inevitably land on here because we’ve literally heard it all before.

But please continue seeking new information and post when you have something original and new that’s based on evidence so the various contributors here can confirm its veracity ; for example who was it that gave the name drop you were pumping on about earlier ?

Troublesome can’t accept responsibility for his errors so has to blame the BoD for not being more succinct in what a negotiated settlement might look like

This board already had one idiot. Now there are two. You and TG2D will get on just fine.

You might find I'm one of the minority who didn't get surprised by the settlement and suggested around £50m net to Nanoco before it was announced. I've bagged this share more than once in its journey.

All you are posting is stuff we already know with a little bit of flair added for pomp. For example who is it that gave the name drop you hint at?

Just let it all materialise if you have so much faith in your research.

Daz why don’t you take out an advertisement in your local rag so you can pump Nanoco to a new audience. Your banal posts here are really not inspiring.

It’s by the 3rd February according to the RND. In theory it could land any day now.

Wishing....from RNS 3rd Febraury 2023

Litigation settlement overview

"Litigation concluded with $150m cash settlement to be paid in two equal tranches (by 5 March 2023 and by 3 February 2024)"

I can't answer that question because its non sensical....

Samsung are likely to be a customer or partner again in future. Regardless they are of course going to pay otherwise they will be back in the US court system for enforcement. It's a stupid suggestion to make.