Member Info for NGR1616

At what price though Hawi?

We shall see today if the payment was priced in.

BC they are obligated to announce the receipt of the funds as it is market sensitive information.

How they distribute said funds is likely largely decided but perhaps they have to wait until it clears before they can announce the next stage.

Proceeds today,...

Troublesome I’m really not wishing to pick a fight here (you didn’t take my earlier joke very well).

But I think we’ve covered the whole “messenger” boys thing so unless you want me to press your tacit allegiance with Tariq Hamoodi ad nauseam as a counter point can we just drop it?

Let’s just agree, you think the board are a bunch of ***** and I don’t. That doesn’t make me one of theirs as you imply.

TG2D i dont recall him saying that about the settlement but im happy to be corrected if you can show me where and when he said that. A win in court I agree was said.

Pirate Pete that’s complete BS. He never said anything about multiplying the share price only that a potential successful win in court could be worth more than the market capital of the company. But there are so many other factors you and others like you conveniently forget and I’m not even going through them again.

How can 6 people tick a post that’s so inaccurate?

The RNS was at 16:02 and didn’t crash anything.

Because it could equally crater the share price

That’s not what they said. They said it’s commercially sensitive.

It doesn’t necessarily mean it’s good. We hope it is of course but there are zero guarantees with inference.

Edison has not changed its 24 FY guidance since first published in October 23 despite 3 RNS's - Asian Customer, 1st Commercial order and the most recent JDA.

To know others is intelligence.

Knowing yourself is the dawn of genuine wisdom.

The mastery of others requires strength.

Mastering yourself is true power.....

so troublesome can you become aware of this.....your posting of quotes you gathered from the internet at every opportunity is really annoying ;-)

But I’d like to see it being proven and it would of course help the investment case

If we aren’t profitable it’s vanity

At the moment our customer is a major customer in STM with a supply of nano materials . It is incumbent upon them to sell their product (the sensor) to their major customer(s) which we hope is Apple to create a functional supply chain. Until that is confirmed the SP will remain suppressed to an extent I think aside from other factors such as the return of value and other potential commercial supply agreements. But in reality what we need is volume to make the company profitable and I don’t care where or who that comes from. Apple is vanity. Profit is something else.

It is and gives live prices

Https://www.investing.com/equities/nanoco-group-chart

this shows more detail

Torpedo

https://www.investing.com/equities/nanoco-group

You can see the volumes on represented by the red and green bars on the graph below the chart which shows large volumes on 16th of Jan