RE: Children8 Jan 2022 12:07
Senseman, given all you've said and quoted in your most recent posts below, I have a couple of questions for you.
1. Why are you suggesting that production can continue to 2024?*
*There was no change to guidance in the RNS Operational Update issued 16th November where the company guiding that the bubble point would be reached between late December and mid -February based on trends.
The subsequent RNS Operational and Financial update 16th December did not update, corrected or reiterate this guidance, there was simply no reference made to the bubble point. Given that the update dated 16th November was subsequent to the discovery of the guidance during the court proceedings (that the well can continue to produce to 2024 as you claim) the most recent guidance supersedes the papers discovered in the court proceedings i.e. the well will reach bubble point in the next two months. I can't understand how this will allow production to be extended by another 2 years without something material happen and by that I mean a change in the parameters in the reservoir, topsides or with the consent.
.....the second question is
2. Are you of the opinion that when the well reaches bubble point they will :
a. choke back to within the permitted flaring consents, or
b. Shut-in as without OGA approval I can't see how you can produce at meaningful daily volumes after February or
c. Some other technical solution and if so what?
Thanks