Member Info for Newuncle

Key aspects of RTO valuation include:

Valuation Drivers:

The valuation primarily reflects the private company's value, which is usually significantly higher than the public shell.

Affrm,

YES.

A reverse takeover (RTO) is a corporate transaction where a private company goes public by acquiring a majority stake in an existing, smaller, publicly listed company (often a shell company).

Now do you understand it when us PRO PPP plc get so ***** of with all the trolls here from the TGM and the other posters who continue to attack, the BoD and posters here with their Anti this and Anti that agenda driven postings.

And yet you sill can't vote yes to the AGM proposals can you? It's like you want the trolls to convince you to vote NO instead of voting YES despite all the efforts by the BoD here after Evans sank the company.

Company value is primarily determined by the imputed value of the private entity (ie RMD) being acquired relative to the listed "shell" (ie PPP plc) company’s market capitalisation.

Now can anyone remind me just how much RMD is worth?

Interesting......thanks to ASI I did a bit more digging re RTOs and look at what I found and I like it very much, thanks ASI, you've helped me very much with my own research.

For London Stock Exchange (LSE) reverse takeover (RTO) stocks

Company value is primarily determined by the imputed value of the private entity being acquired relative to the listed "shell" company’s market capitalisation.

Valuation Logic:

The value of the combined entity often reflects the fair market price of the private company's assets and future earnings potential, which is typically much larger than the original listed shell.

An imputed value is an estimated or assumed dollar value assigned to an item, asset, or service when its actual market price is unknown, unavailable, or not explicitly recorded. It represents an inferred, calculated worth.

ASI,

You quoted the same rule that I did when I made my comments, so clearly you made a misleading quote when you quoted UKLR 3.2.7 when talking about RTO requirements previously.

If you are gojng to quote LSE rules to back up your potential RTO/Dilution claims then at least try to quote the right rules.

If that is the case then maybe CTAI could do a 50/50 deal in cash and Klarian shares (which almost pays back the original loan in total and take the rest of the monies owed in shares in Klarian).

Just saying....

Really....are you going to spend the whole day, week, month blathering on about a court case here...................is that the sum of this, only a poster with gains from RR shares would be a buyer here now....and god knows why

OMG....bring back AHS and Massive asap.....this thread is as dull as dish water without them.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....bit like the share trades, boring and irrelevant.

CAFC contract will be small potatoes for sure....but it could lead to other clubs (football or other sports) coming on board.....got to start somehere.

£700,000 +++ in Klarian monies due by mid May

Alludiuam updates ?

Current mcap is just too low thanks to a forced seller over recent months.

Supply will be drying up

Only a few weeks to wait for payment to be confirmed now...£700k++....loverly

Jeez.....

From Zak Mir today

Comment: One could perhaps say that even if the CLN is not paid / fully paid by the middle of next month, Klarian will be in a position to pay it back sooner rather than later. It is also the case that CTAI would appear to have made a decent investment, whatever the timelines on repayment are.

"It's about time the moderators started to do their job with all this false information being posted"

Actually it's a shame that LSE and the so called "Advisers" here didn't take the same views when GST released their RNSs over recent years...would have saved alot of people alot of money.

AHS - MIA

MASS - MIA

Sprout - MIA

Morning Zag,

Funny how the trolls are so blinkered now and playing the "potential dilution" card for all it's worth.

It's all they've got now to grind us down with but no one know for sure what the "potential dilution" could actually be in real numbers so they are just making up figures to suit their agenda.

It's the motivation of our trolls that interests me more than anything now.

I expect the "Potential Dilution" card to be played over and over again by the trolls up to the AGM vote.

But as a certain DJT might say about the trolls "They don't have the cards".

Watch this space.....

Affrm,

Pretty much yes, if PPP and their new broker (Oak Securities) can provide required evidence to the LSE.

IMO that's why PPP plc are bringing back Texas asap and why they have appointed Oak Securities as their new broker.

Plus we have the backing of a billionaire backer who has now joined the BoD as Co-Chairman (a very smart move by the company there).

I am 100% certain Mavriky will deliver restoration of Texas next.

Don't forget the appointment of the highly experienced Sergiy Lesyk Sergiy has over 25 years of experience in the international financial services sector, including wealth management, corporate finance, and investment banking. He is currently Director of Research and Analytics at FTSE Russell, a subsidiary of the London Stock Exchange Group.

He will have considerable knowledge and contacts within the LSE required to ensure the full restoration of PPP plc.

UKLR 3.2.7 (formerly LR 3.2.7R) in the FCA Handbook sets minimum market value requirements for securities to be admitted to the Official List. It mandates an expected aggregate market value of £30 million for shares, £200,000 for debt securities, and £700,000 for closed-ended investment funds. The FCA may modify these requirements if an adequate market is ensured.

✅ Modification: The FCA retains discretion to accept a lower market value if it is satisfied there will be an adequate market for the securities.

UKLR 3.2.7 (formerly LR 3.2.7R) in the FCA Handbook sets minimum market value requirements for securities to be admitted to the Official List. It mandates an expected aggregate market value of £30 million for shares, £200,000 for debt securities, and £700,000 for closed-ended investment funds. The FCA may modify these requirements if an adequate market is ensured.

Financial Conduct Authority | FCA

Financial Conduct Authority | FCA

Key Aspects of UKLR 3.2.7 (UK Listing Rules - July 2024 onwards):

Shares (Equity): The minimum expected market value for shares is £30 million, according to the FCA Handbook UKLR 3.2.

Closed-Ended Investment Funds: A lower threshold of £700,000 applies to these funds.

Debt Securities: The minimum market value for debt is £200,000.

✅ Modification: The FCA retains discretion to accept a lower market value if it is satisfied there will be an adequate market for the securities.

So having seen great updates from PPP on so many fronts the negative posters now focused on potential dilution as their justification for attacking the bod and positive posters.

Note the word "potential" and AI generated scripts.

Stuart,

I think that a certain ex director will be briefing his minions from a land down under, so a time lag is inevitable when trying to co-ordinate Australia, Thailand and European Time Zones. They will be back once the attack plan has been agreed.....and each poster has been given his agenda topics.

And then there's the votes from Phuket, Thailand "where our upstanding regular, family man lives.....strange but true apparently" to vote with his 6 million shares or not vote with his 6 million shares depending on what day of the week it is and another 1 million at 12p or maybe not, again dependning on what day of the week it is.