RE: RESUMPTION OF TRADING28 Apr 2026 11:03
Personally I am amazed that the new Board have continued to work so hard here when they could easily just walk away and avoid all the extended effort and work they are going through with the FCA and Landowners in Texas to rebuild PPP's reputation. Now there will be those who just say the usual that the new backers have seen the opportunity to secure a listed company and its assets on the cheap. Nothing anyone says will change that view so it is what it is.
I and other supporters prefer to look at the positives in business terms whist the naysayers will play their corporate governance card forever.
Despite the facts that the corporate governance issues go way back in time and the previous management did nothing but make it worse year on year to the point where the FCA clearly said enough is enough when the 3rd suspension hit, still under the old management btw.
Now naysayers still feel they have rights to xx% and refuse to budge on that and would rather lose it all instead.
Great, will the naysayers please explain how they will compensate me and others if the company fails to come back because of the NO voters actions.
I want my shares back and potentially my money back at some point, is that not a fair thing to expect?
Why should I and others be punished and lose everything because the No voters are determined to keep 100% of nothing so they don't get diluted in any way.