Member Info for Newuncle

Sorry but that's just not correct.

SM,

"Main Event? Alludium Show case."

I can't see anything about this?

ASI

We all know who's pocket shillington is in

.

When he goes abusive you know he's losing the argument as usual and lashes out

Evans paid attack dog it's just so obvious

If you feel like that then vote no as you clearly have been convinced that you cannot trust lunn

Rest of us will vote yes to take this forward

Vote no for continuing suspension and no funding and high risk of PLC going out of existence

The no voters will get you nothing back but they know that and many have said they would rather lose it all now than give lunn anything and most of then can't handle the the thought of being diluted even though the company has no money.

If course the no voters still believe in some mystery plan to save the company but it's all BS and fud

We have not included any resolutions granting directors authorities to issue equity securities

whilst the Company engages with its shareholders on the future of the Company.

ORDINARY RESOLUTION (special business)

8. THAT in accordance with section 656 of the CA 2006, the shareholders note that:

(a) the net assets of the Company are now half or less of its called-up share

capital;

(b) the report of the Directors prepared for the purposes of section 656 has been

presented to the Meeting and considered; and

(c) the steps proposed in that report to address the serious loss of capital be and

are hereby approved.

The Directors are authorised to take all such actions and do all such things as they

may consider necessary or desirable to implement the proposals set out in that report.

Resolution 8 – Serious loss of capital

This is an Ordinary Resolution in relation to the Company’s serious loss of capital.

Delta

Correct as usual

We have not included any resolutions granting directors authorities to issue equity securities

whilst the Company engages with its shareholders on the future of the Company.

Zag then vote no because RM clearly stated the following in his rns and confirmed a further AGM will be required to approve accounts for 2024/2025

A further AGM will also be necessary to approve the 2024/25 accounts which will come in due course.

Zag

Don't fall for the BS

They offer nothing in reality other than loss of directors and PPP being stuck off with the PLC being lost

Zag

Based on what?

So judgement day was a waste of time and money

And still no alternative funding plans from anyone

Roll on the AGM and endorsement of PPP plc resolutions in full

Then it's on to Poland as a new company with solid financial position and director additions

Coffin posters busy today

Guess it's usual abuse and ignorance being pushed

Any comments on how to raise funds from them, thought not

G1

Now it's all about funding to take PPP forwards as the company has hardly any funds today.

PPP have given us their plan but no voters refuse to accept it because of dilution

Any and every small cap faces these issues and shareholders accept dilution to keep companies solvent so it's not wrong for PPP to need to do it.

TG refuse to accept it but how can funds be raised by any other means?

I would love to hear the answer

We have the PPP official plan but TG refuse to accept that because of the dilution so how would an alternative plan raise funds without dilution?

Noble Petroleum USA Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pennpetro Energy PLC (PPP), an independent oil and gas company focused on production in Texas, USA.

Delta

Accurate and factual post won't be accepted by the no camp voters but well done for trying.

Have you got thoughts on how PPP could be funded going forwards?

We have the PPP official plan but TG refuse to accept that because of the dilution so how would an alternative plan raise funds without dilution?

Hep

TG and their scare tactics never ends but they don't have a plan

Joke

Hep

The more you peel the onion the more obvious it becomes what's driving the TG

Hep,

btw are the TG not happy about the court result today, guessing they realise they wasted £000s on that now?