RE: Blow up day again, wouldn't want to be out on a Friday22 Aug 2025 07:10
Normbeef at 06:48, Fri, 22 Aug 2025. Here are my views to your excellent points [recommend]: [1] In Geological procedure, one cannot just DRILL further in depth UNLESS the hole END in mineralisation. One will see many co's END a hole with no mineralisation or mineralisation has taped off. In WSBN's case, they will return to Hole 1 after ending in 777m. Why 777m? If they have a target of 750m per the RNS, they want to go a bit more to get END OF HOLE DATA. [2] In the case of Cascabel, a distinguished Geo was hire and he does XRF onsite so that when the assays return back from the lab, he checks - he did find an error which the lab had to correct. [3] Yes, they can CRUSH a part of the core to TEST for au since it tends to be disseminated in Paterson, W.A generally. [4] Before an RNS can be issued, it has to be SIGNED off by a GEO and he has to be licenced or a qualified to sign off geological reports for RNS. Then, the normad has to view it also. [5] So, yes, I am with your mode of thinking as above and my view is that IF, the RNS from WSBN of 18.8.25 & 20.8.25 is as correct, then the rest of the details in the RNS of mineralisation ie chalcophyrite & pyrite etc is also deemed to be correct [until and unless proven wrong but there are checks and balances as said in the whole reporting line]. Lastly, a question on who is the broker that does the research? SP Angel did the Initiation Report and I note for the last two WSBN RNS, SP Angel has been reporting on them. DYOR.