Member Info for news

notrader
Isnt Strudel and Bamps21 saying that Apollo [ARV] will turn up nada just due to GGP's ZIPA.
That disagrees with ARV's RNS and what the directors of ARV believe or think?
Strudel doesnt say he's invested in ARV.
Bamps21 doesnt say he's invested in ARV.
You dont say you are invested in ARK.

So, why come over and say Bamps21 is respected? What has Bamps21 on GGP to do with ARV's Apollo.

If Bamps21 is INVESTED, he would NOT have told me initially today about Zipa given I said that Australian ARV investors do not CORRELATE ZIPA [GGP] with ARV's APOLLO. Bamps21 does NOT agree and indicates that ZIPA is correlated with ARV's Apollo ie if NADA or no significant mineralisation at ZIPA,[NCM-GGP], then NADA AT APOLLO?
THAT IS NOT WHAT ARV DIRECTORS OR CO SAID IN THE SAID Q1, 2022 PRESENTATION given they said they may have INTERSECTED GOLD AND COPPER AT APOLLO BUT IT NEEDS CONFIRMATION FROM ASSAYS?

So, what is this defending Bamps21 for?

IF BAMPS21 AGREES WITH ARV, THEN HE WOULD NOT HAVE COME AT ME FOR QUOTING ARV AS SAID.

So, is he an investor, shorter or just plain anti-ARV or anti-investors of ARV?

Why all coming over from GGP. CAN STOP ARV NOW, THEIR TWEET HAS COME OUT, AUSSIE ARV HOLDERS ALL KNOW AND RNS IS ABOUT TO REVEAL APOLLO HOLE 7 ASSAY RESULTS.
EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT Q1 ARV PRESENTATION SAYS as said.

Why all this to do from GGP given you have your own shares in your co?

Thanks.

This ARV tweet has now been posted on ARV Hotcopper today.
https://hotopper.com.au/asx/arv/ 1 Apr 2022 [Fri]
The poster [not me] provided a SCREEN SHOT of the ARV tweet.
--------------SO AUSSIES ARV HOLDERS ALL NOW KNOW--------------
PaddyGall1 comment to the ARV tweet is also known and ARV's reply to him:

PaddyGall: "Planning to be out there for quite a while then.2
[Ref to ARV tweet with pics of their ordered Paterson Central CAMP UNITS to be delivered later this year].

ARTEMIS RESOURCE REPLY TO PADDYGALL1:
"SHOULD DO US TILL WE BUILD OUR OWN 500-MAN CAMP."

--HC NEW THREAD: ARV : PATERSON.--
So, EVERYONE NOW KNOWS. LoL.
1 Apr 2022 [Fri]

"Midweek takeaway with Alastair Clayton, Executive Director, Artemis Resources."
-Audioboom, Season 3, Episode 18.

Mr Clayton invested in GGP shares from his AIM listed co. He is a Geo by profession and he did his PhD in Geology on Telfer, Paterson [NCM mine].

Mr Clayton:
INTERVIEWED due to ARV listed in London in early 2022. He said that high net worth have bought into ARV. Drilling of ARV's Paterson was "END OF LAST YEAR - encouraging geology."

-"Interviewer asked: ARV CONTINUATION OF HAVIERON GOLD SYSTEM?
A. Clayton: "GEO TEAM BELIEVE -MAY BE CORRIDOR - CONTINUES."

-"Prove this corridor - by drilling.
Whether we BUILD our own mine/SELL - focus on DISCOVERY.
HUNGRY MILL [TELFER] to fill ." [Saying that there is still a lot to fill the hungry Telfer mill."

Clayton also mentions THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN ARV AND GGP WAS DONE 25 YEARS AGO.

Have a listen as luckyorange812 posted it on the #arv twitter thread or artemis resources twitter thread.

-------------SO, A. CLAYTON'S GEO TEAM HAVE THEIR HYPOTHESIS-----
This is AFTER they drilled APOLLO last year. ARV has just listed in London.
So, the geo's at ARV have seen the cores of Apollo esp Hole 7, Paterson [ARV] and that is their opinion which Mr Clayton has not gone against.

FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH ie ARV RNS's and Q1,2022 ARV PRESENTATION all say the same thing. Results due and not late per Artemis Resource on Twitter tweet to someone who asked. TODAY'S ARV TWITTER talks about ORDER CAMP UNITS ie bought for delivery later in the year.

So, that is the story from ARV themselves, and nothing to do with me.

I only have shares in ARV as I go with ARV's official RNS/said presentation/Clayton's said interview as above.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022 @6:50pm

One more last point.
When Studel from GGP came on to ARV forum to take me on when I merely quoted
the ARV said presentation on Hole 7, APOLLO, Paterson geological descirption BELOW the said Core 7 pic [1 of 2], I said that I CANT THINK THAT BAMPS21 DOES NOT KNOW WHAT "CHALCOPYRITE" IS. ARV stated: "...MASSIVE SUPHIDE....CHALCOPYRITE..." [description of Hole 7 core in said ARV Q1 presentation].

So, if well researched, the world [geological] CHALCOPYRITE appears on many RNS's of junior explorers like Solgold etc. Even GGP-Newcrest uses these geological terms to describe their hole assays etc.

---------So, hence, why I asked Bamps21 if he is a Geologist by profession----
No offence meant but we, investors need to know.

----Lets wait for the Hole 7, ARV assay results gents ie STRUDEL, BAMPS21 AND LEBUGE-ADDICK ----if your hypothesis is that ZIPA [NCM-GGP] IS NADA, then surely ....-----
LoL.
That's what made Bamps21 come out today to comment when I said the AUSSIES ON HC ARV said they are hoping that HAVIERON FLOWS INTO APOLLO. So, they are taking APOLLO [ARV] ON ITS OWN MERITS, RATHER THAN USE ZIPA TO SUMMISE?

Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
Nothing to take on cos the ASSAY RESULTS FROM ARV HOLE 7 APOLLO WILL PROVE ALL THINGS AND WHETHER YOU 3 GENTS ARE RIGHT IE STRUDEL, BAMPS21 AND LEBUGE-ADDICE ABOUT NADA JUST BECAUSE ZIPA IS NADA??

Strudel-Bamps21 & lebuge-addick
Are you guys from GGP getting upset that ARV may be successful?
Otherwise, if you are shareholders in Artemis Resources, you would have to support each other?

I am a shareholder of ARV and I go with their RNS/said presentation of Q1,2022 relating to Hole 7, Apollo prospect [ARV], CENTRAL PATERSON, WA which is <3km from GGP-Newcrest world class Havieron.

I ask because PaddyGall appears to have BROKEN RANKS WITH THE 3 OF YOU as he says he has shares in ARV and is waiting for assay results from ARV re: Hole 7, Apollo, Paterson Central, W.Australia. Also, he is watching ARV carefully on Twitter, hence he asked them about their tweet about ordered new camp units and whether this means they will be there for some time - norm is to RENT.

Dont know but seems that way -running from GGP forum to here to .....take me on for no reason given that is FROM ARV'S OFFICIAL RNS/SAID PRESENTATION.

lebugue-addick @17:05pm, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.

What has vouching for Bamps21 for?
It has NOTHING to do with the coming assay results for APOLLO HOLE 7, ARTEMIS RESOURCES. This is to come via a ARV RNS.

Bamps21 has initially said today about Zipa, GGP - Newcrest Havieron which is just south of ARV's Apollo and he is basing this on Apollo.
So, if read correctly, then he is of the view like STRUDEL -NADA [Zipa]?

So, why are you here dear Sir, if you feel its NADA?
Later, Bamps21 changes when asked by Cela24 and he then says 50-50.

Cela24 is disappointed that Bamps21 cannot give him/her the answer to 1-10 for Apollo 7 of ARV coming assay results.

Artemis Resource tweet today, Fri, 1 apr 2022.
Click the reply icon to see the verbatim from Artemis:
"Just ordered our FIRST 49 Degree Spec" PATERSON CENTRAL BASE CAMP UNIT S..savings over time compared to our current RENTAL units." ["from Explorex for deliveries later in the year.].

PaddyGall1 asked Artemis if they are going to be there for some time re: above twee [ARV].

Artemis replies to PaddyGall1: "SHOULD DO US TILL BE BUILD OUR OWN 500-MAN CAMP."
Link: https://twitter.com/ArtemisResource/status/11509786777409703961 Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
---STOCK MARKET HAS NOW CLOSED, Fri, 1 Apr 2022 @4:55pm---
---ARTEMIS HAS NOT TWEETED THAT THE ABOVE [WITH PIC OF 49 Degree Spec Camp Unit ordered] IS AN APRIL FOOL JOKE INCLUDING WHAT ARTEMIS SAID ABOUT 500-MAN CAMP as above.------

MY POSITION:
I AM GOING WITH ARV'S RNS/PRESENTATION Q1,2022 WITH DESCRIPTION OF HOLE 7, APOLLO, PATERSON CENTRAL .WA CORE DESCRIPTION -"..SEMI-MASSIVE SULPHIDES...CHALCOPYRITE.."

Also, ARV's said presentation: " Co believes it may have already INTERSECTED TARGET gold-copper mineralisation but requires ASSAYS TO CONFIRM. Assays are expected MAR 2022."
Also, the part in the said ARV presentation that the directors ......could replicate the stockmarket success of GGP's Havieron. [Please check as para-phrasing].

---------------MY 51% IS ON WHAT ARV STATED AS ABOVE ------
Therefore, that my personal position and everyone has to decide themselves.
Many do NOT buy before the official RNS but that is their position given it has less risk as norm for any pre-announced assay results. However, the price could be different if it turns out or NOT [either way, up or down].
-----The other chap says 50%-50% to Cela24 and the convo refers. I would NOT have to answer IF we were on the same note as the ARV RNS/said presentation. ---

So, let's record for history of ARV.
My own money is on the line here and I can only decide for myself as others have to decide themselves.

Nothing to do with who we are etc.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022. @5:03. DYOR.

On EMH, listed in London and ASX, their shares have gone up ON NO RNS.
One of the posters stated that ALL THE ASX LITHIUM CO HAVE BEEN RE-RATED.
As I said, the Australians have gone really keen on lithium stocks in Australia.
Kindly check.

THR's RAGGED Range lithium project, Pilbara, W.Australia is in a hot sector.
Hence, hot sectors are being chased by Aussies, LoL.
Fri, 1 Apr 2022.

Bamps21,
Studel commented on ARV Apollo based on GGP's Zipa.
You commented. If I were to believe you and NOT ARV's official RNS/said Q1, Presentation,2022, then I would have to PERSONALLY SELL ALL MY ARV SHARES.
So, my money is involved here. However, I had to ask you pointedly, which you may have taken offence to whether you are a Australian Geologist by professional with a major mining co in Australia with years of experience in exploration and seen Tier 1 discoveries by assumption, that cant be helped.

You said you know about me. Yes, PaddyGall1 quoted Pangea, a Geo in Australia taken from HC wherein he was going to report Newcrest relating to Havieron relating to 0.2% cu as being not economic [PaddyGall1 posted on GGP]. I asked and again.....so that is your context.
Now, PROVEN HAVIERON IS WORLD CLASS - Newcrest themselves said it.
So, one needs to know.

I am off now as I am going for some greens/fruits.

LAST WORD: THE ARV RNS ASSAY RESULTS EXPECTED WILL BE THE DEFINITIVE AS THAT COMES FROM THE AUSTRALIAN LABS.

MY VIEW: I posted from the ARV RNS's/SAID PRESENTATION Q1,2022 dated 17.1.22.
I either take ARV's OFFICIAL REGULATORY RNS/said presentation and today's ARV tweet or I dont. I go with what ARV states.

Nothing more to discuss till the ARV RNS.

--------I STAND BY ARV: Hole 7: "....SEMI-MASSIVE SULPHIDES...CHALCOPYRITE.."
[description by ARV in their said presentation on Hole 7 APOLLO.]
HOW MUCH OF THE 700 METERS IS X OR Y, I DONT KNOW. THAT WILL BE REVEALED IN THE RNS TO COME IE RESULTS OF ASSAYS FROM HOLE 7, ARV APOLLO.

No offence to ask Bamps21 if he is an Australian Geo with a major with years of experience in Australia. SALPATITE declares his professional position and even then he got the size of Havieron wrong ie smaller?

Yes, we do need to know unfortunately.

One last point , BAMPS21
Our perception is that you had an earlier view but you have now changed.
Yes, I have to ask POINTEDLY because if you are a professional Geo working for a Australian major in the Pilbara, then your word/view can be considered but if you are a private investor, then that has to be made clear.

That is no offence given if money is involved, then there needs to be TRANSPARENCY from you - now we know that you are NOT A GEO from Australia working for a major.

That is helpful to ALL OF US INVESTORS on ARV.

With thanks.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.

Cela24

Of course Bamps21, you are aware of who I am given I posted on GGP in the early days before you came to the forum. No, there is no ...as you say. When there is MONEY INVOLVED, we, investors need to know.

Why? If you are a professional Geo from Australia working with a major and an exploration geo, then your view is different and maybe it lends to ARV's official RNS/said presentation.

Your earlier posts to me does not appear to agree with ARTEMIS RNS/SAID PRESENTATION based on GGP's ZIPA.

Now, your reply to CELA24 is slightly clawed back?

Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
You say I dont know who you are - that is correct given you have not said you work for x or y.

BAMPS21 @14:43 , Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
"News, no significant mineralisation is not my words."
Whose's are they? Newcrest - their latest RNS says, assays pending from Zipa/N.Havieron.
On ARV, Qtr1,2022 they also say assays pending.
Strudel -paraphrase, Zipa duds [2 drills].

BAMPS21
14:41, Fri 1 Apr 2022.
REPLY TO CELA24 asking for your opinion [you said you are not a Geo or in Australia]

"50-50% RISK."
"..AS FAR AS I CAN MAKE OUT, PAD 7 WITH SIMILAR ..TO HAD 05 [STILL, 1 OF GGP'S BEST HOLES] looks PROMISING, NOT SURE OF THE SIZE THO."

My Comment:
Ah, that is better Bamps21 for a private investor. So, history says that you do not call out Artemis Resources RNS/Q1, 2022 Presentation and that you are NOT SURE OF THE SIZE.
That is what I said IT IS ABOUT HOW MANY METERS OF 537,559 METRES OF HOLE 7, APOLLO ARV IS MINERALISED AND FROM WHAT DEPTH [2 pics shown in said ARV presentation]. This is because the pics may NOT be representative of the WHOLE LENGTH OF THE HOLE AT 700M which ARV said they want to DRILL DEEPER.

----------ONE HAS ALSO TO LOOK AT THE STRIKE OF APOLLO 7 ARV TO KNOW POTENTIAL SIZE-I HAVE ALREADY LOOKED FROM THE RNS /SAID PRESENTATION OF ARV, so I am cognisant of the potential.-------------

Thats all Bamps21, thank you.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
By the way 50%-50% means you are NOT SAYING WHAT YOUR VIEW IS as a private investor.
That is OK, as that is your own position.
I have STATED MINE. OTHERS WILL HAVE TO DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES AND DYOR.

Bamps21 @14:32
Let's get this straight. We have Artemis RNS's on their Apollo project, Central Paterson, WA
as well as their Presentation Q1,2022 which I have quoted from in which they show 2 pics from Hole 7, ARV Apollo, <3km from GGP's Havieron with GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION of "...SEMI-MASSIVE SULPHIDES....CHALCOPYRITE..."

In this said Q1,2022 ARV presentation which I have quoted VERBATIM from , it was said that the directors of ARV "believe" they could replicate GGP's Havieron success etc and they show 2 core pics of Apollo Hole 7.
----
On this forum, Strudel has posted about ZIPA and said it turned out 0 and you now say, "no significant mineralisation." Big difference between 0 and no significant mineralisation.
ARV said one can miss a Tier 1 given the space of 400m and several km per their said presentation. That is how NEWCREST MISSED HAVIERON FIRST TIME and GGP PICKED UP HAVIERON years later. NOW, HAVIERON IS WORLD CLASS -JV WITH NEWCREST.

---------------FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT--------------
I posted from ARV's RNS and their said presentation plus DL for some outside comment given DL picked up the ARV Paterson Central licence, 1 hr before Rio could get to it.

A lot of people may now be reading this forum and our $$$ is AT RISK HERE.
Hence, we need to know IF YOU ARE A AUSTRALIAN GEO, CLOSE TO THE GROUND WORKING IN THE PATERSON ETC ie exploration geo with years of experience.

If you are, then your view is of a slightly different level vs a pi.

No, its NOT ME that is ... but in your posts today, Fri, 1 Apr 2022, we either BELIEVE ARV's RNS or NOT. UP TO EACH ONE. If you are correct about all you said, then one may think from RIGHT or WRONG INFERENCE that ARV is NOT CORRECT as said in their RNS on Apollo and their said presentation. PLUS TODAY'S ARTEMIS TWEET which says they have ordered NEW UNITS for their camp and not renting anymore as it saves on cost. USUAL IS TO RENT.
Also, ARTEMIS tweets reply specifically to @PADDYGALL1 about 500-man camp.

So, EITHER ARV IS WRONG IN ALL THEIR RNS'S ABOUT APOLLO AND THEIR PRESENTATION OR THEY ARE RIGHT.

So, NOTHING TO DO WITH ME BAMPS21, WE NEED TO KNOW AND ITS BAMPS21 VS ARTEMIS RESOURCES here.

Fri, 1 Apr 2022. DYOR.

Just checked GGP for "GEOJIM".
GeoJim has 8 posts to his history and joined on 30 Mar 2022.
He does not say he is a geo and from his first post, he sounds like a pi?
Getting interesting.

Fri, 1 Apr 2022.

BAMPS21

Posted on GGP: "Title: Re: Squeeze Fri- HI GEOJIM, WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON ZIPA HAVING NO SIGNIFICANT MINERALISATION." @13:14 , Fri, 1 Apr 2022
https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/bamps21

Bamps21 told me on this ARV forum that he is NOT A GEO and HE IS IN THE UK, NOT AUSTRALIA. STRUDEL said that GGP's ZIPA turned out nothing, para phrased [please check his exact words] but Bamps21 now says Zipa, "no significant mineralisation."
BIG DIFFERENCE between Strudel and Bamps21 on GGP-Newcrest;s ZIPA.

So, Bamps21 now goes to GGP forum after telling me he's NOT A GEO and in the UK ie PI to ask GEOJIM ABOUT ZIPA?

LoL.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.

Bamps21
Thank you for your reply at 13.53 that you are NOT a Geologist by profession but you converse with geo's.

Also, you are in the UK and not in Australia where ARV is at ie PATERSON CENTRAL, WA, Australia.

Point very clear now.

news, 1 Apr 2022.
------------We await official RNS from ARV about Hole 7, Apollo, Central Paterson, WA
& Catlow-Chapman, Pilbara re: nickel given Artemis tweet about Andover, Azure Minerals Maiden Resource.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
So, like all of us, pi's we have to have a view ie our wallet.
PRE-INVESTING IN PRE-ASSAY RESULTS FOR ANY CO CARRIES RISKS - that is obvious.
Hence, if I was wrong at GGP's HAVIERON HOLE 5 VISUALS WITH DESCRIPTION of "massive sulphides", I would have had to take a $$ HIT.

So, let's be clear that I cannot guarantee for others. I can only decide for myself.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.

Bamp21,

Thank you for your kind reply @13:26, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
A few points:

[1] "Cores on pad 6 heard what it contains." [Reference to what we are currently discussing
ie Hole 6, Artemis Resource, APOLLO, Paterson Central, <3km from Newcrest-GGP's Havieron.]
So, you confirm what I said, in that Hole 6 ARV Apollo has NEVER BEEN released via RNS, Presentation dated 17.1.2022 [Q1,2022] nor on Artemis Twitter.

[2] "CORES ON PAD 7 HAVE BEEN RELEASED AND LOOK VERY MUCH LIKE HAD 005, SO OPTIMISTIC BUT THEY DONT LOOK CONNECTED AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME."
[For reference, we are discussing Artemis Resources Hole 7, APOLLO, Paterson Central, WA.
HAD 005 is referring to Greatland Gold's DISCOVERY HOLE 5, HAVIERON [famous now].]

So, lol, you do not dispute that GGP HAD 05 AND ARV HOLE 7 APPOLLO "look very much like HAD 05"!

DL pointed out in his 20 Dec 2021 tweet showing both HAD 05 and APOLLO Hole 7 as one being CUT [William Langley 'pic of Havieron Hole 5] and Hole 7 Apollo UN-CUT CORE.
PaddyGall1 said that HYDROGEN sent him the pics once ARV's HOLE 7 CORE PIC CAME OUT.

------------PERSONALLY, I DONT GO BY PICS BUT BY ARV'S DESCRIPTION OF THE CORE
in the ARV Q1, 2022 PRESENTATION namely"......SEMI-MASSIVE SULPHIDES AND
....CHALCOPYRITE" plus what ARV themselves said ie THEY MAY HAVE INTERSECTED COPPER AND GOLD BUT NEEDS ASSAYS TO CONFIRM.

I have seen on ARTEMIS RESOURCES TWITTER that they have a XRF machine at Catlow so one could suppose that they have also taken XRF results on Apollo 7 but they cannot release XRF as it needs assay results from the lab. Also, XRF is not good for gold and the rule is it must be assayed, so only good for copper.

----------------BAMPS21, LOL, YOU NOW CONFIRM WHAT DL SUGGESTS B U T you Q U A L I F Y "BUT THEY DONT LOOK CONNECTED AT THIS POINT IN TIME." [Ref: GGP HAD O5 & HOLE 7 ARV APOLLO]------

Several intepretations here of what you said:
[1] Yes, they look alike.
[2] "They dont look connected at this point in time" [Bamps21] ie ARV took it from somewhere else and not from ARV's Apollo Hole 7?
[3] An un-cut core Hole 7, ARV Apollo is hard to see vs Greatland Hole 5 CUT core [which only William Langley had].
So, one has to go by ARV's OFFICIAL GEO 'S DESCRIPTION AS ABOVE.
ARV does have CUT CORES TO SEE AS NORM BUT THEY ARE NOT RELEASED.

------------So, Bamps21, you have QUALIFIED your ARV HOLE 7 LATEST COMMENT FROM APOLLO.--------------

RED-DIRT
He said on GGP [LSE forum] that he has a Geo friend who has seen the core from HAD 05, HAVIERON at the lab.

So, since you talk of Hole 6, ARV Apollo with pink feldspar which is NOT in the ARV RNS, that means that geo's in Australia are talking with you.
What do your Geo friends/colleagues say of HOLE 7, ARV APOLLO because YOU DONT SAY.
-----------------LoL---SO BAMPS21, YOU MAY HAVE STAKED YOUR REPUTATION
ON WHAT YOU SAID.-------------

=====I am not a Geo so, I can only go by REGULATORY NEWS SERVICE [RNS] from ARTEMIS RESOU

Bamps21 @12:52, Fri, 1 Apr 2022

"..GEOLOGISTS I HAVE TALKED TO WE'RE EXCITED BY THE PINK FELDSPAR but I am NOT sure it will contain anything & I hope I 'm wrong on this."

"Hole 6 APOLLO has brought up PINK FELDSPAR."

My Comment:
I have NOT seen the ARV Apollo Hole 6 core pic so I cannot comment.
However, I have seen 2 core pics of APOLLO HOLE 7, Paterson, WA per RNS/Presentation Q1,2022 with description of "..SEMI-MASSIVE SULPHIDES ...CHALCOPYRITE..."
[Please check as I cannot provide warranties for recall errors etc].

My Comment:
"ARV PRESENTATION Q1, 2022 [go to search engine, enter Artemis Resources, then icon investors, see presentation part].

"CO BELIEVES IT MAY HAVE ALREADY INTERSECTED TARGET GOLD-COPPER MINERALISATION BUT REQUIRES ASSAYS TO CONFIRM. ASSAYS ARE EXPECTED MAR 2022."
-------------FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT---I can only go on ARV RNS/Presentation Q1,2022--

So, Bamps21, it suggests from your post that you are a Geo in Australia? And that you have talked to other Geo's in Australia on ARV 's PATERSON CENTRAL re: APOLLO HOLE 6 but NO mention of Hole 7 Apollo as per above from ARV's RNS/said Presentation.

I am not sure if you could be salpetite from HC given there are lots of geo's posting on HC including engineers. salpetite was the only one commenting on GGP's HAVIERON on HC Antipa and he said it was akin to Carpentaria in size , now proven not correct as its much, much bigger if one believes analysts etc.

So, BAMP21 -lol, you have pinned your view ie -------------NO?----------------
Have to see what you say for history.

I can only go on what ARTEMIS RESOURCES SAYS VIA REGULATORY NEWS SERVICE, so lets be clear on that.

news, Fri, 1 Apr 2022.
DL has also tweeted on 20 Dec 2021 on both cores Hole 5 HAVIERON [GGP by William Langley] vs Hole 7 APOLLO [ARV] with comment to which paddygall1 also commented.
I posted the link before or go to DL's tweet and open replies.

DYOR.

Bamps21
You say I havent been following your posts - where you dont mention, LoL.
There is NO Bamps21 on HC, ADVFN, CEO.CA or LSE ARV specifically on Zipa-N.Havieron and
more specifically on APOLLO HOLE 7 [ARV]. Just to make this clear.

In your latest post a few mins ago, you did not MENTION HOLE 7 APOLLO with 2 core pics [source: ARV Qtr 1, 2022 Presentation + RNS/s].

PADDYGALL1
"7 Mar 2022: Hi mate, yes I*m still sitting on all my $ARV shares and patiently waiting for the Apollo assays and the resumption of drilling. Shouldnt be too much longer although I know theyre had some wet weather in the Paterson recently." https://twitter.com/paddygall1/status/1500765847786242053 [paddygall1 in reply to someone who asked him about ARV]. However, paddygall1 does NOT post on this forum.

-----------------WHAT ARE YOU SAYING BAMPS21---IS THAT A REPLY TO ARTEMIS'S TWEET OF TODAY DATED 1 APR 2022 RELATING TO BUYING THEIR OWN UNITS INSTEAD OF RENTING AND TALKING ABOUT THE 500-MAN CAMP [POTENTIALLY]??--------------
With due respect, I am NOT sure where you stand and your assay projections if any?

Fri, 1 Apr 2022.