Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Thanks for the replies... I sent this question to Valirx last night and was pleasantly surprised to receive a reply from Suzy confirming she would put it in the next Q & A session.
What are people's thoughts on Valirx being in a position within the next 12 months to generate income and not having to reply on placing in the future?
why would they do that?
I was a bit disappointed with the reply to the VAL301 and the Japanese company question as Suzy seemed to say that the broker had no idea if this news was imminent or not. Surely the BOD shouldn't have allowed false information to be added to the broker note? Or am I missing something. I have a substantial (for me) investment here and would love to add to my position but this worried me slightly. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
The only reason the price isn't moving much is SYME is very kindly waiting for me to transfer my Cash ISA to a Share ISA so I don't have to pay capitol gains .)
Sorry about that Tomvisual I was eating lunch and AFK.. Thanks for the replies..
So if there's 32 billion shares then how realistic are these valuations? £1 a share would value the company at £32 billion?
They would have to have loads of customers ???? BTW I am invested here so this is a genuine question..
Can someone tell me the number of shares there are for this company? LSE says -
Supply@me Capital Plc Ord 0.002P is listed on the London Stock Exchange, trading with ticker code SYME. It has a market capitalisation of £180m, with approximately 32,755m shares in issue. Over the last year, Supply@me Cap share price has been traded in a range of 1.0525, hitting a high of 1.1, and a low of 0.0475.
But some of the posts here mention over a billion. ? I'm confused..
So as there is no news that we are aware of for this drop over the past 2 days do we think this is just profit taking? I'm happy to hold my shares for as long as it takes as long as the company is moving in the right direction.. My only concern with VAL is that unless a partner is found then there is no income stream for the company .
What a great response from Gilders01 to Stach... We all have an opinion and 'm sorry if some people have lost money in the past due to the irresponsible management but when you use the word "Pathetic" then the rest of your argument becomes sour grapes
I have worked very hard for my money but won't be upset if VAL multiply it for me..
I won't buy a Bugatti at £1 a share but maybe if it got to £2 some day.. )
Do you think the low price (compared to other similar sized companies )is a hangover from the previous management and the way the company used to be run? There seems so much potential here or do the markets not believe it?
I'm relatively new to VAL and and personally can't see any downside to the company?
So do we think this weeks rises are all just manipulation? I was hoping that this time it would be sustained?
Thanks all for taking the time to reply.. I think I have a better understanding of the situation now.
I obviously don't know how the market works or I wouldn't be asking this question so here goes . If some of us here (me included) think these could be exciting times for this company then why doesn't one of the multi-national Pharmaceuticals think the same and just buy it out? I mean 12 million is a drop in the ocean for them?
Totally agree.