RE: Columbus RNS30 Oct 2021 11:21
Dickupham,
First of all, great post ....
Right, where do I start, please don't take this the wrong way Mitch / ACW, but as a LTH feel as if we are on a perpetual merry-go-round that is slowing but steadily grinding to a halt, one that is being run for the benefit of the showmen. Regardless of the BKR uplift and Columbus after that what !!! OK, N Eigg scheduled for 2022, but tbh I have not got much faith in that drill or any other for that matter, btw, please let us know, what is the COS for the drill as I have not seen it anywhere! Since BKR (which will probably never be repeated by anyone, let alone us) SQZ have done very little. Failed Rowallan, failed R3 afaic in terms of both cost / project overrun and poor flow-rates, failed to get any deal away. We have Columbus, discovered in 2006, so only 15 years to get online & counting, yes I understand reason for that. SQZ, by default, our BoD, are living off the royalties of BKR
I see SQZ as a 'steady-eddy', happy to plod along, someone to go down the pub with, have a round of golf, a reliable friend but not one you would want to go into business with. However, here we are in the business of O&G together, yet as the marco headwinds grow ever stronger SQZ appear directionless and I fear the apparent lack of decisiveness in driving the business forward will weigh ever greater on our SP with only LTIP seeing growth ! Time after time we are told we "will not overpay", for an acquisition, yet numerous deals have been done as we've sat by. Clearly our criteria is somewhat different to others in the market, just hope we are not perusing the impossible BKR dream once more.
Said it before, will say it again, make our cash work or distribute it rather than it being used as a comfort blanket for the board, better still, get a deal away to sell SQZ.
All, very much so, IMO.