Member Info for napthman1

Pepas would get very good iv terms but the biggest takeaway and the reason for sharing again was.....

OMI HAS MULTIPLE OFFERS OF FUNDING

Thats easy for you to say just depends whats on offer. Tell me what's the difference from doing a jv or paying a consultancy.

Tbf rick rule is desperate to fund things

I really think that pepas could be getting jv's so no dilution needed and moat likely a good cash injection

Https://youtu.be/1DUFCye0VP4?si=vG8qBK5_gEqrgjOj

Join a telegram Group screen shot your traded.

Only way you will get the credibility you so desperately seek

Looks like both on a ban and posts have been deleted

Very exciting, brad has indicated in last rns that they are very good grades

JV potential and we know Newmont are very interested as they have been giving free advise and consultancy, free pays off for them in the end like brad has also mentioned on previous interviews

Keep Reporting Victoria and gsent they will get a ban

Good thing about omi is low shares in issue which big boys prefer

Big bounce coming 🚀🚀🚀

Looking forward to a X update 🚀🚀🚀

Miners are following

They want in without spiking the price.

Going north quickly.

I wish i had held off to today but in a months or two this will be over 50p

Legal as per the rns more infill drilling is required but if more come up with those grades omg i mean I cant get my head around it huge impqct on value

Off she goes

Coarse Gold - PEP055

The quoted composite assay result from PEP055 of 47.25m @ 15.25g/t Au has been influenced by two consecutive high-grade samples across 1.9m in which visible gold was noted in core. These two consecutive samples returned 465.71g/t Au and 122.74g/t Au respectively. Outside these two samples, grades assayed were largely in line with adjacent holes.

The Company feels that these two samples represent a real, and very high-grade vein, but are also cognisant that coarse gold has the potential to create a sampling bias if incorrect sample preparation has resulted in heterogenous distribution of gold throughout the sample.

To assess the potential impact of this, pulps from these two samples were re-assayed twice, with reasonably consistent results (table 2). The Company is therefore confident that no significant sampling bias has occurred. Geologically however, such high-grade samples are a statistical outlier and will require further understanding so that their impact on a MRE is accurately reflected.

And if its a defo rate cut coming miner's will explode

Gbent 😂😂 that beat my two tier kier

Just keep reporting gsent

Eventually Gsent and co will get a ban