Member Info for mytton

Morgan? I did not realise that.
What a f.. up

why by 30th?
Thx

badshah - havieron Newcrest
https://twitter.com/NewcrestMining/status/1174138052056190976?s=20

jd - but the bought v sold figures are misleading , my top up shown as a sell. suppose the overall volume figure is accurate

Forget spurious rumours. This is all about Newcrest/Havieron

A couple of trades either yesterday or day before of under 2m easily moved the SP from the 1.70s to over 1.80

Buys shown in red... as usual. I know because one of mine is showing as a sell

"Newcrest CEO Sandeep Biswas said in Denver. "We've not seen grades like this or these structures in the Paterson before."
He sounds keen!!

crackers - That explains everything!!

if main market listed u will see the director shareholdings in the end of year accounts - unlike aim co where on website u see the director shareholdings under Aim Rule 26

SYFresh - if you were not already invested would you be buying today on this news?
If not, why are you thinking of selling and buying back in ? (not that I think you will get the price you want).
If you are selling up it makes no difference where you reinvest to try to get back yr losses - look at alternatives or stick with MATD only if you think it has the best prospects

Sale of HDY business should be a forgone conclusion.
From news Feb 2019 - "Invenire has allocated $500 million equity to build a sustainable and profitable portfolio in the sector."
So the acquisition of HDY's business is small change for them.

Newcrest re Havieron: "drilling to assess for a Newcrest size target underway"

https://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/announcements.do?by=asxCode&asxCode=ncm&timeframe=D&period=M6

owlo- just more unspecified assertions.
Are you saying any part of GGP's RNS is incorrect.

Yesterday was cut 'n paste pretentious nonsense.
One example...
"I need to point out that ALL organisations eg Sprotts, Numis, William Langley including myself ... "

I dont think there is anything to summarise

Following on from yesterday's ramblings, if anyone has any "concerns" on this extract from the recent RNS please enlighten me as it seems all good to me:
"From a technical perspective, there are a number of positives contained within these results that I would highlight. First, each of drill holes HAD012, HAD013 and HAD014 intersected significant widths of mineralisation (in excess of 100m at better than 2g/t gold) and higher-grade zones within those intersections, including an interval of 43m @ 7.9g/t Au, 0.83% Cu from 900m in HAD012. Second, each of the three drill holes above extended the known mineralised envelope of the system, primarily to the north and the west. Third, these results establish a new peak gold grade for the system of 324.9g/t gold (in excess of 10 ounces of gold per tonne)."

I'm calling bullsh#t on all that semi-gibberish yesterday.
For example, a bunch of random remarks with a comment "newbies would have been shaken per experience..." firstly doesn't even make sense and secondly suggests another motive.
For better or worse I will stick with the co's RNSs and reported comments by Newcrest who are supposedly delighted with "excellent drill results" at Havieron - this coming from a co that made profits of US$500m last year.

... and nothing on AZY either.