Member Info for MVarawa

The government of the inept and liars is now considering letting people access some of their pension pot early.

So of course they word it as though they are doing it to help you !

in reality they know many will simply dip into the money to spend on unessential items, all part of the plan to get us to spend, spend and spend to get them out of the big black hole they have not dung, but used explosives to create.

They want you to buy shares.

Buy a new house and pay some stamp duty in the process plus all the other charges that come with these things.

They want older people to down size especially those with 3,4,5 bedroom houses for the immigrants to fill, again down size spend money to buy a smaller house but still pay stamp duty.

Somehow they think there will be spare cash to fulfil Ed Milibands schemes, buy an EV , get a heat pump ,put new windows in.

And do not forget most of these schemes will attract that big revenue earner VAT .

Buy a new home and refit it VAT buy some furniture and VAT get an army of tradesmen in and pay VAT (even if most do not pass it on)

As I have said we are bankrupt and soon the government will not be able to borrow money unless the bond interest rates rise a lot higher than it is now.

A lying tart is acting as the Chancellor, the bank of England as a plonker with a history degree! in charge, the board which sets the interest rates has real economists sitting there listening and obliging these two morons. It is like having the local pharmacist advising a heart surgeon.

Every frigging day it gets worse , the army needs to go in and stand 650 MPs against the wall and then go and do the same in the civil service.

It is starting to feel like the last days in Hitlers bunker, he thought some fictitious 9th Army was coming to save the day.

Gate13 Boy

Is there a difference between being taken for a fool by a bank or car finance agreement or a PPI and the government lining people up to be ripped off to suit the government's own interests, to save their own SKIN.

Get into debt to try and get the building industry going.

Put your savings into things you may not know anything about just to get the Stock market going.

Pay more tax on the money you earn and then pay more on the money you save and then pay some more, if you are lucky enough make a profit on the stock market ! Then if you happen to have more than £16000 in the bank after all that they will tell you that you cannot claim certain benefits.

They say that wealthy pensioners should not get a pension but will not define how much wealth they mean , if £16,000 makes you wealthy enough not to get certain benefits, well then pensions are a benefit as they like to tell us and mention every week !

Those 100,000 afghans will not come cheap £7 billion per year for only 25,000 of them that looks like the minimum of £ 28 billion per year and that is not taking in the extra benefits like the expectant child and motability cars etc.

67Sam

As you say what can go wrong borrow 5.5 times your £50,000 salary.

After tax that multiplier will not be 5.5 time, so in practice that £275,000 they may be able to borrow will be funded by £39.500 on average which means a ratio of over 6.8 . And that is without any other attacks on their incomes. Then deduct all their living costs and council taxes etc !

And young workers are supposed to be able to save for a deposit as well .

If they are second time buyers factor in the stamp duty!

Legal fees!

Better to go to France and come back in a little boat, Rayner will gladly build them a home for free with our tax money.

!6 year old's older enough to vote.

But they cannot buy alcohol , cigarettes , Gamble except on a lottery ticket with parental consent !, cannot sit on a jury, cannot buy fireworks ! or knives or airguns !

Their parents are still responsible for them until they are 18yrs of age. They cannot have a full driving license for a car, but can be a learner.

See how desperate Starmer in usingchildren, children who need parental control even to watch some TV programmes are being used by a so-called Human Rights Lawyer, called Starmer. A Human Rights lawyer who did not give a toss for the RIGHTS of 1000 of young white girls.

He now attempts to imply that most 16 year olds are in full time employment paying tax? when they are not. those that do work will be on the minimum wage how much tax will a 16 to 17 year old pay? One sick man, one evil scumbag.

Hollybean

Wishing you and others all the best with your investments.

At the next station you may find Reeves waiting for your train to stop.

Rogue.

politics has something to do with everything.

As you will find out when they increase Capital Gains coming soon to you and everyone else.

16 year olds voting themselves the ability to borrow from Lloyds and not paying it back, renting one of their new flats and not paying rent and not being able to turf the children out on to the street.

The effects are many of the unintended consequences .

All those young Muslims who are Starmers real voting targets, voting for Sharia law.

Dorfan

And conscription if you vote for a war mongering government then you can go and join in.

And pay national insurance on their small earnings.

They can get into debt which will be theirs not daddies.

Perhaps Starmer has is not being too honest to the parents of the school children he wants to use to save is own skin.

And let 16yr olds use dangerous machinery at work, losing a hand or leg will do them good, but there will be no benefits for them soon.

Starmer is like Hitler using boys and girls to try and keep him safe in his bunker .

Next to please the perverts that we import and vote labour the dropping of the age of consent .

This shxt on legs is dangerous .

Dorfan.

If only they would spring a leak at least then the life boats could have some proper work to do, fishing out the stiffs.

Don't go down to the sea in small boats if you are not prepared to get wet!

The Far End

The latest act of a desperate man.

Bringing down the voting age will of course have consequences .

Will 16 yr old's be liable for call up. after all if they can vote, they can fight and die for what they voted for.

One of the arguments used for lowering it to 18 yrs was because an 18 yr old could fight and die, so let them vote .

Parts of the laws will need updating for sentencing.

But it will provide a lot more Muslim votes at the next election for labour so sure of winning he needs to have school use school children .

The government says that they will not be carrying out a witch hunt to find who leaked the list of Afghans, come of it they know who did it just another cover up . Was it an accident or a planned leak ?

And what religion was the person who leaked it and what race, you see the civil service including the MOD has been striving to be inclusive !

Lose the country a fortune and no come back, come on lets get real, provide the means to bring in potential criminals and terrorists and no come back, perhaps early retirement will be the punishment !

But I do not wish to start a conspiracy theory but what if the person who did the leaking is a Muslim and it was no accident ? not so far fetched in reality is it.

Fisherking.

Could be a wise move greed is many a person's downfall, as I know from experience always wanting another penny rise and then it dives.

Taxes will rise and the areas that they can rob are now getting thinner on the ground.

Clown.

Why did they need to set up a Superannuation pension scheme for the Afghans ?

Interestingly Labour are of course saying that the cover up is down to the Tories to which no one can argue .

No comment, on which person crept to the Americans ie Bush junior, in sending British troops there and into Iraq

No comment at all, but of course the Tories would have done the same creeping.

I think Afghanistan alone cost us £40 billion then add on the cost every year since and to come of looking after all the immigrants who used these wars as an excuse to decamp to the UK and elsewhere .

I await Starmer mentioning that Brexit was the cause .

On the thoughts of having all those trained Afghan army veterans walking around doing nothing, could we not form an infantry brigade with them, as war with Russia is imminent, so we are told, so battle hardened troops will come in handy. Being Islamic warriors they would jump at the chance surely.

Interestingly Labour are of course saying that the cover up is down to the Tories to which no one can argue .

No comment, on which person crept to the Americans ie Bush junior, in sending British troops there and into Iraq

No comment at all, but of course the Tories would have done the same creeping.

I think Afghanistan alone cost us £40 billion then add on the cost every year since and to come of looking after all the immigrants who used these wars as an excuse to decamp to the UK and elsewhere .

I await Starmer mentioning that Brexit was the cause .

On the thoughts of having all those trained Afghan army veterans walking around doing nothing, could we not form an infantry brigade with them, as war with Russia is imminent, so we are told, so battle hardened troops will come in handy. Being Islamic warriors they would jump at the chance surely.

For 20 years or so Afghans working with British troops (for cash ) walked around in uniforms with visible faces and it appears no locals or the bad boys noticed them ? They were not seen leaving home going home or even followed home, none of their children spoke about it of their family.

If some had tried that in Northern Ireland during their little troubles, does anyone think that the bad boys there, would not have known who they were and done something nasty to them.

Just another excuse to bring as many of them here as they could. There was a super injuction alright but not to protect the Afghans more Manure on the Mushrooms folks.

PS. A while back I stated that Starmer had had a Super Injunction placed on his queer past, someone on this board was adamant that there was no such thing as a Super Injuction !

1000 Afghans are already going through the process of starting legal proceedings against the government.

I read that the legal firm representing them is aiming for compensation of £50,000 per case, so £ 50 million charged to us if they win.

Plus the court costs and lawyers fees for both side to be added onto the final sum.

If 10,000 claim and win that £50,000 that £50million becomes £500 million plus all costs.

No doubt lawyers will be attempting to find how they can get every Afghan illegal immigrant who lands on the beaches into the claimant pool .

Interestingly and something that has not been picked up on, the new in coming amendments to the immigration rules will save us about £3 billion per year.

So by just tinkering around the edges £3billion per year can be saved ,

So the government is actually saying for once that immigration is a cost, that we have been lumbered with for decades under the lie that it creates growth/wealth. Think how much could have been saved, how much we would not have needed to have been borrowed if we had not been deceived .

£ 3 billion just by tinkering, without the illegals we could have added another £12 billion, without Universal credit being paid to 1.3 million foreigners another £12 billion could be saved. Just these three sums add up to £27 billion per year just these three and the list of other wasteful costs is long.

I have said for some time that we throw at least £100 billion per year at immigrants and foreigners like the £550 million to keep foreigners in prison each year.

For those that like to keep their heads in the sand and think only Lloyds bank shares should be discussed, remember everything the government does and has done in the past will and has affected your investments . The money in your bank account, the money you have not realised because you have been taken for mugs big time since 1997 and we know who and what came into power that year.

If not for the riots in Southport scaring the establishment shxtless all would have moved on as norma !

The Far End.

An unexpected jump in inflation ! unexpected by those with degrees in History and false CVs pretending to be world class economists .

Getting banks to lower interest levels on savings and borrowings whilst we all know that prices are rising fast.

Cutting your interest whilst inflation and taxes rise !

Wealth redistribution but not as we know it !

Some of the Afghans already here are already making plans to sue the government !

On Trump saying that NATO should pay its way, well the Afghan fiasco was an American knee jerk reply to their crying after 9/11.

We actually spent around £30 billion helping Trumps America now we have to take in the results of their cowardly pull out.

I would suggest we tell America to take a hike, to use one of their sayings, next time they panic.

Now that this cover up, is out of the bag, the next one will be to ensure that any of these allowed in, when caught committing crimes which they will, will not be in the news.

Imagine the uproar when they start appearing in court for sex offences and murder and they will be, that is a certainty.

We make them safe and ourselves unsafe and we are to smile at them !

This country has never in its history been led by such evil crap as we have had since Blair came to power in 1997 onwards .

ATISHA

They now fear riots after the super injunction used to hide the government's underhanded plan to give asylum to 24,000 Afghans.

The Super Injunction was bi-passed by a leak by a whistle blower.

Another £6 billion per year for keeping these lot, they should have fought harder against the Taliban, will Starmer be asking them to defend the UK with as much bravery.

Now we see why they need to impoverish those who pay the bills, cut everything associated with our living standards to improve the living standards of others. Make our streets unsafe to create safety for others That 600 Afghan interpreters that Boris let in turned into 13600 with little fanfare.

They should be fearing riots because they do insist on being their cause, the British voter did not vote for this.

Take winter fuel allowance.

Cut benefits which both Labour and the Tories used to buy votes and to cushion those put out of work by mass-immigration.

Spread the net for inheritance tax.

Stop pensions for wealthy pensioners.

Cut tax savings on ISAs .

Raise pension age.

Increase road tax .

Increase council tx

VAT on private schools

Are people so blind or just stupid to see which group pays and which group's take?

And Blame the Boomers for everything.

Reeves/labour to encourage banks to draw or push savers into stocks and shares ,to gamble with their money and into home ownership.

So Thatcher was correct then.

Private ownership is the best form of ownership.

Socialist economics along with hand outs to buy votes and off-shoring production has, as they now admit in their actions if not in words bankrupted us from 1997 to 2025 . 1997 socialist Labour and Liberal Tories.

So in effect who are they asking to save their skins, for their Real Workers who cannot write a cheque will not be gambling their savings, for they have none according to Starmer and our new imports send their spare cash elsewhere in reality . Those delivering pizzas will not help or the cash in hand enterprises no barber shop owner throwing any money Reeves way.

Who is left to take the gamble, no £85,000 guarantee of getting your money back on the LSE is there.

And it would be interesting to see which law firm comes up with a scheme to get the lost money back for investors who fall for this ?

The government is encouraging banks to lend more and with lower deposits to house buyers, those who are finding it hard now to raise the cash needed now. Secondly they want banks to be the middle men in encouraging their savers to move into stocks.

Is it easier to sue the government or a BANK if it goes pear shaped?

A crafty move by this caring government .