Pros and Cons14 Jul 2024 08:55
For any potential investors looking in. Feel free to add or criticise!
PROS
- Experienced and highly aligned board that is delivering on clear objectives
- Management incentivised with performance related LTIP
- much higher retail market awareness and acceptance of LFT
- need for, and moves towards, decentralised healthcare
- many applications; clinical, animal, plant, environmental, defence
- huge innovations to increase sensitivity, and sustainability
- much more scientific interest in LFT and ergo many more developers
- large and fast growing market
- expanding distribution network, to include major retailers
-Boots OEM arrangement which appears to be working well and could expand to other products.
- fee model gives revenue certainty
- developers take the risk - we get paid regardless
- any products succeed, we’re likely to manufacture and improve annuity underpin
- Large, growing and varied customer base
- Growing revenue and margin
- Negligible cash burn (cash flow positive in Q4 2024)
- Continued strong revenue growth expected in FY 2025
- costs controlled
- ALL areas of the business delivering growth
- our risk is spread across diverse customer base and application area.
- exciting products in the pipeline, including LDAP accepted.
- positioning as an LFT CDMO knowledge leader
- boosted regulatory offering in complex regulatory environment
- planted footprint in USA with FOFH
- Owns 25% of Eco-Flo Innovations, with first to market plastic free cassette set to launch imminently. A clear selling to customers given environmental concerns.
- Automated manufacturing capacity for tens of millions per year, currently under-utilised.
- more customers transferring to manufacturing, and more to come through the hopper
- able to offer full end to end service towards commercialisation (research, development, scale up, manufacturing, kitting, packaging, marketing/distribution, regulatory)
- small free float.
- no significant debt.
CONS
- regulatory treacle. Takes a long time to obtain approvals as the number of notified bodies hasn’t keep pace with market requirements. Doesn’t affect CDMO revenue, could impact manufacturing revenue, should increase regulatory revenue.
- raise risk. Burn in H2 was 700k, so c£115k p/m, although cash flow positive in Q4 and aligned mgmt dead against dilutive raises.
- CDMO competition, although this small
-Glassdoor suggests lower level workers find the working environment toxic, although that’s because they’re busy!