Member Info for MTucker

Most people that are persuaded by the story have hoovered up millions and millions of shares years ago. Just not persuaded to add even more until clear indication

Today's drop has nothing to do with ZPHR directly. It is what has dogged this company for years! Two bob traders getting to settlement day and not having the cash to buy. If you can be bothered just trawl back and look at 250k 300k 400k and 500k deals. Bought one day then closed at a loss T10 days later. The MM know when hot money is due to settle.

One certainty is the SP is not being managed down by the company. That though is laughable.

Said it before, say it again. Penniless traders closing their losing positions. Who the hell would sell stock they had paid for at these levels.

Probably quite a few lurking around this thread so thanks for that and if the cap fits! Guarantee no-one will own up but some fairly regular posters are obviously culprits. I could even name two or three.

Dominion has been Enbridge for about 2 years.

CH is currently working with Enbridge to complete connection agreements.

The real reason the SP is this low us that there are about 20ml shares constantly being traded on T10s and cfd by punters constantly trying to get their timing right and not having the cash when it comes to settlement. The MM know exactly how much "hot" money is swilling around and move the prices accordingly. When will these people EVER learn

.

Papa.... Taking 7p would be bonkers. Just sit tight. I have for 4 years.

No Setanta you are not right and i wish (like me) you were able to speak to CH when your ear stopped hurting i doubt you would put forward your "managed" share price theory again.

That was to Ebbs btw.

Interesting viewpoint but can you be sure that CH is not close to signing a major partner. I would not be betting against that....

Nice projections Cruthie and time will tell but probably about right although i would be very surprised if production not started in Q1 and partnership in half the time ....

If i was an invester i would hope the target company owned a diktionary.

Don't think the investor is too worried about the debt .... Even if it was 37 million...

What a pathetic pond life you are. Is TW still desperate not to lose the bet?

A lot if things are Colin's fault... But not punters running out of time on their gambles. The story of Zepyhr for last few years.

The forced sells from last week have not shown up and by my calcs will not be reflected in a holdings RNS.

I give up. I know you have had your conspiracy theory for years and i have thought it nonsense for the same time. I know you hold (or so you say) many millions of shares as do i so i do share your pain. Selling at these low prices would certainly NOT suit the major shareholders.

As for the forced sellers, that is NOT guesswork

Hydras, see below. Forced seller

Setanta, why do you keep pushing the theory the company is manipulating the share price down?

It is unhelpful and totally illogical. Why on earth would the largest shareholders want to minimize their return???

Granted, the development of Paradox has been glacially slow and news on progress abysmal. Not everything is entirely in the company's hands . They can't tie into the gas network without the agreement of those that own it. The deal has to work for both parties.

It may be that the management are out of their depth so thank the Lord for Sproule on whom we can rely. Their assessment is conservative at every level and yet their as is valuation is way ahead of current market valuation. Just hold that thought . As for the current SP horror, well sadly it seems their has been a large forced seller and the commensurate over hang which is clearly difficult to shift in the current market.

So where are we? Certainly the board have produced a gulf between frothy hype and delivery and mismanaged timings but we do nonetheless have.a very valuable asset that will be sold OR developed. Don't forget the financial support given by PM recently. They are not stupid!

Take a deep breath and trust that the muddlers will finally muddle through

No they were not. Either moving between sipp/isa, a rollover ( unlikely ) or even an insti moving betwee funds but NOT two sells

Let's just suppose that setanta is correct although I have 100% do not subscribe to that theory. On the one hand it may of course be the case that they are avoiding producing from the paradox and are in fact wishing to sell the whole estate. It would only make sense if they were trying to get as little as possible for it because the further the purchase price away is from the current share price the bigger the premium.

Selling it for 20p when the share price is 3p is unlikely selling it for 20p if the share price was 10p has mileage.

Christ sake Papduke , try bothering scrolling back one post before you sound off.