Member Info for MrJinx

Who's threatened? I'm just going to report you to the site admin for defamation of character. Why, are you offering violence? It seems like you're offering a 'meet up'? I'll add that to my note to admin also.

So, I've got this right, you called me a liar, a very serious claim when talking about defamation of character. Yet now the evidence is out there that I was correct, you no longer want to discuss 'facts' and neither will you apologise for that defamation? Be careful how you answer now PM.

Tell me again what the losses were for last year again PM, I didn't quite catch it on the presentation :D))))

Hahaha...who's taking sides? I'm saying what I'm seeing. :D

PM...do you not get the hypocrisy with you asking posters not to be insulting? I know you're not the quickest noddy on the bus but even you can at least see the irony?

Lol...even at $15.6m, plus $8m in G&A and cash overheads, it comes to $23.6m. On a duster, that leaves Chariot with enough money for 12 months operational costs. That equates to 2.2p. If ever there was a time for a CEO not to be Larry, it's now!

'New venture', anyone? Hello.....anyone...?

We've seen that abused in the past!

Growl, I listened to the presentation phone in. As at Year end Chariot had $15m. Together with the $16m recently raised, that's $31m. Larry stated drilling prospect S (and possibly W in the success case of S) will cost between $20-25m. G&A is $3.4m and cash overheads are $4.2 which equates to a possible 2018 spend of $27.5-$32.5m. If Larry doesn't succeed farming out to these mysterious non-operators, Chariot is shagged, without a further fund raise. How can he then promise 'Mo', who called, that there wouldn't be an equity raise. I also noted that Larry brushed over the fact potential 'operators' weren't bothered about prospect S.

...2 'positive' RNS' and the trades today are 1.6m sells against 300k buys. Until farm-outs on decent terms are announced, this is going to remain unpopular and drift lower. Cue the irrational stating 'buys are showing as sells' :)

...did you imagine the market would be more positive to the rig confirmation news? I'll be honest, I thought it would, as at least it confirmed the drill in Q4. However, no mention of a proposed date, prospective costs or rig rates and confirmation that Chariot are still grubbing around to find a finance partner, probably subdued any potential upward movement on the sp.

I've just realised this is Noricum Gold. I had a dabble in that calamity about four years ago. Difference between then and now I feel, is Geo aren't scrambling around in 100 year old discoveries hoping to mine scraps. However I do remember the RNS's where it was only a waiting game before discovering the end of the rainbow. Please tell me it's not history repeating itself? It doesn't feel like it but sometimes some CEO's just repel success!

Why do you feel that is? Decisions by the bod's or not considered RNS worthy by the contracted PR company? Are the salient points of that call summarised elsewhere as a communique rather than an RNS?

Shopping around for a new adventure and watched the John Meyer interview on iii. Seems he's keen on Geo and from the little research I've completed since, I'm struggling to see a downside. Projects ongoing, sizeable cash in the bank, non-dilutive near term cash generating operations, great ore % concentrations discovered etc etc. So, as current holders, what are the downsides? There must be some as 'Cashout' has thrown the towel in. I don't know if that's even relevant as I see only good things here.

...by John Meyer

Your conclusion is poor, ill thought out and contrary to all evidence. Have another attempt if you like....

Despite all their efforts to keep the sp above 8p, the Market has succumbed....7.9p.

My interest, is interest. I'm interested in what the Bod and LB are going to do next. If they screw up again, that'll hit the sp and the value of whether to re-invest at another point in the future. If they do something stupendously brilliant, that will affect whether I jump on board for any rise. I don't particularly subscribe to the idea that you can only comment on a company if you're invested only at that particular moment in time. How does that even promote sensible dialogue? I do find the whole concept of dismissing views based on their holding or lack of it, quite perplexing. Had I never invested but my views were positive, I'm sure they would be welcomed with open arms. Also, if I owned millions of shares, I'd be spoken about with reverence, just like Wheepo. However, because at this point, I'm largely negative about the company's bod's and the running of Chariot, my view is classed as irrelevant, as I've sold up. Even though the actions of the bod's has affected my investment. Just because my investment strategy is different to someone who supposedly sees a positive in being 'loyal', does not make my opinion less or more valid than theirs. What I would say is Aim is littered with Shell Companies that have fleeced those loyal investors who stayed too long. So, that's my interest. :)

Hahaha...deflection always seems to be the 'go-to' response on here!:D

I see on iii, that they're now spinning the possibility of not drilling Namibia in the Autumn as a desirable option. Really? Talk about preparing yourself for a punch in the guts!