Member Info for MrJinx

I'm of the understanding that MMS are legally obliged to close all positions by end of trading, on that particular day.

Okay, so the mineral is 70% cu but taken as a whole with surrounding rock, shit and detritus, it's nearer 0.5%?

Unless I'm reading it wrong, an excerpt taken from the Trivino discovery RNS 9-12-15; "The high copper content mineral species chalcocite (70% Cu) has also been observed in the vein and in disseminations...

Solg found a near surface discover 300m x 200m with cu up to 70% in some samples. A world class discovery. As positive as today's news is, it's not Solg...yet! ;)

Strewth! :) Yeah, alright PM. :D)))

...just seen the update. After years of disappointment this little company might now be onto something. Time to get these out of my bottom drawer.

...if you've trawled through my posting history, you'll see I have no 'hidden' agenda. My agenda is out there for all to see including my sp average, my holding, my sell and my sell price which shows a small loss. A loss not worth being vexatious about. I also stated my on-going position and stated my buy back in price, with my reasons. So you see PM, you're twisting truths to suit your agenda. I'm as open and as honest as they come pal. :)

...facts!

Lol...you're desperation is stinking up the room PM. Nearly 1200 posts and still, the only one you can pick fault at is an estimation of expenses. In fact, going by the latest presentation of full year accounts which is the arse end of 2017, the overheads/expenses/losses depending on your terminology are way in excess of your $5m. What is stated is a sentence in the 'Final results of 2016' relating to the reduction in staff and board members which states, 'This restructuring has enabled Chariot to cut its annual cash overhead, before any recovery from partners, to US$5.0 million down from US$9.4 million back in 2013....' This does not include 'other' operating losses PM and I think you're a little confused. The figures I gave earlier, and they're freely avsilable on Chariots website, show a loss of $14.5m. At an exchange rate of 1.34, that's £10.8m. So yes, I was wrong PM, the losses are way over the £6m i 'estimated'.

Operating losses $12m; income $1.3m; finance expenses $3.9m; net loss $14.5m Out of which $4.3m is listed as 'other administrative costs'. Is this where you're getting 'in the region' of $5m PM? If you are, that's a big LOL :D)))

It was an estimation pm. You know, when you're estimating when 'news' may be due, or when you suggest 'deals may be finalised'. Does that make you a liar? You're actually coming across as someone quite odious. A trait I wouldn't necessarily have associated with you before now. I appreciate you're becoming desperate and losing more money every day, but lay off the personal insults, there's a good chap. In regards to overheads, do you believe your 'in the region of $5m is acceptable? To remind new readers, thats not including any exploration costs.

Post again tonight as me, Growl and Goon are off down the pub. It's quiz night... ;)

...but you call me a liar? As for keeping to 'facts', my posts yesterday were totally factual, but were reported to admin. You don't like facts PM. You'd rather pretend the past didn't exist and guess the future like mystic meg.

Oops! I put near 1200 when it's actually 1172.... :)

So if I understand you, you've trawled all my previous message history and you're calling me a 'liar' (which is quite an insult), based on me saying '6' and you saying in the 'region of 5'? Out of all my near 1200 posts, that's the key you're using to discredit my opinion? Are you high?

Lol...your post is so fantastical, I don't even know where to begin. Suffice to say, you fail to see the irony in your ramblings. You intimate that I'm 'consistently negative' to 'target a lower entry point'. Why are you 'consistently positive'? To boost the price perhaps? This is a discussion board PM where issues get discussed good or bad...supposedly!!!

It's not looking good, is it Growl? Don't get me wrong, if they come back with a 1-2bn potential reserves, I'll be pleased as punch and maybe reconsider my re-entry point. However, as Goon points out, Larry is just as likely to relinquish Brazil as he is to farm it out.

You appear to be at a disadvantage regarding my position. My holding position is zero. I have a re-entry point in mind which I've posted on here many times. I'm not being negative because I'm trying to depress the price, I'm voicing my concerns over a poorly run company and wish it was different. My opinions were the same when I was holding 350,000 shares. And true to my instincts, Larry kicked us all in the nuts time and time again. So PM, how often have you been right with your predictions, compared to mine? I'm also not up my own arse enough to think anyone is going to base their investment decisions on anything I write on here. If they do, then they deserve to lose their money. The difference between you and I PM, is that I'm balanced and a realist. If Larry and his team do anything welcome, I'll give him praise. However, you seem to be such a happy clapper that you can't see or not willing to see the potential pitfalls. Which means your ramping is more dangerous for the naive investor than my cautionary tales. Nobody has lost money because of anything I've said.

How many farm-out deals have been signed at any of these conferences. Your post has been reported for being misleading.

The people who run this website have no grind unless someone gets 'grassed up'. Nothing that I posted yesterday was untrue and reflected accurately the historical timeline of failure. So why would my post be removed for 'market abuse'? It turns out that rampers on here do not want the 'truth' to be out on this board. New investors beware! PM, you should hang your head in shame.