Member Info for MrHumble

The Swarm Protocol: Coordinated pile-ons designed to exhaust critics through sheer volume of bad-faith responses

Before we continue, I am noticing a concerning pattern

100% pump if no critics around. 100% attack if any around. Can't you guys find some balance? I thought it was just here but I have noticed the same pattern across 14 media platforms. Rapid responses to tweets and so on.

Are you all ok?

Keyword Weaponization: Strategic deployment of terms like "psychotic," "obsessed," or "bitter" to derail actual financial discussion

Concern Trolling Mastery: "I'm just worried about your mental health" (translation: "please stop reading our financial reports")

I thought we might look at a few financial market quotes today

Dire was right. Just met 127000 new friends out there.

hTtps://x.com/YankTrain17909/status/1946645017604362650

Actually no idea who they are, but if as friendly as here, I hope there will be a few BBQ's

'Find some friends soon, it will be good for you, trust me.'

That was great advice. Do you know what, I might just do that.

Might be back whenever big news arrives here. Possibly anyway. Not sure. Depends what my new friends like doing.

You would hope the PI's show more interest than in the WRAP.

Whilst you are all head-hunting for talent, do any of you have any concerns as real holders?

I'm just not sure what perception people are supposed to have post the 'Window of Assurance - numbers' . Given all that occurred in it, is it even a question of NDA anymore? I do not think so.

I think TW has a fair few past articles himself out there about it in past companies. None were very complimentary lol

Tbf to most, I think it was the fact that they were assured some numbers would be announced, and they were walked straight into a cash raise and then the NDA was yet again quoted

Not really nice to be assured one thing, get diluted/slaughtered, and then suddenly it's 'NDA' again.

Back in a week or a few weeks. I hope this time, my not participating is not put down to more rubbish about 'connected removals' and lies of similar ilk

No. Just nothing more to add in this period

GLA

Well, when i say cash, I don't actually mean registering in cash flows. Recognised. But when you mostly deal with the market uneducated, it looks just as good anyway.

See you all when there is actually something new to analyse, even if it has a curtain over it

I reckon they do at least expect a bit of cash from croda. May not be much, but enough for AIM PR. The reason i suspect some cash is due, is because they went straight back into cash extraction mode with another deal. Genius at that.

£250,000 per quarter is no good. Superdrug is now £525,000 per quarter outlay, average. It will not be net quarterly profit in any phase of the deal window. Standard. Which makes you wonder what they were thinking. You need super croda numbers to come out, and soon.

Or any reasonable investor will look at costs/expenses, and wholly expect further raises.

Given time, and of course, Superdrug cant take of in a day either - you are going straight down the realm of more cash raises. The costs are now way too high (that was before superdrug deal averaging an extra £175000 per month average outlay over the period)

The CEO assured numbers in June. Not so sure, assured no more raises, again. Lets look beyond why not given. Certainly did not assure numbers at the time, if none existed i guess

So there has to be numbers That really should no be the case of a can kicked down the road yet again. From numbers in June to cant even add to a report? No. What to ponder soon, is the quality and size . Not only must numbers exist, they must be very big - or its a face value cash raise in the not too distant future.

I must check. If not, then I think this would be a great note to accounts

1. No royalty revenues reported

2. Royalty revenues recognised, reported, but based on company estimate

3. Royalty recognised revenues reported, and verified by auditor re a copy of the net sales and usage croda report, observed.

Makes a big difference in terms of risk strategy for investors.

I was just reading an interesting post elsewhere (last post to news)

If any figure is recognised, but not received, does the auditor have to confirm that the sales and usage report from Croda was seen/verified by the auditor?

Oh hold on - would this be in an unaudited accounting phase?

Lets see if anyone spotted something. Tbh, most likely not. It takes a keen eye and a sharp calc to spot it. So obviously i did not. Was just the musing of somebody elsewhere

Im just looking at stock counts from 3 points

High to low 27-16

The recent upper range

The current range

Im looking at what is printed on L2 as unknowns , for the periods

Did you notice anything?