Member Info for MrHumble

Bulls bears dogs and turkeys.

Gerbil is a relatively new term that originated in a cave in Afghanistan

Interesting. You can go deeper on the turkey stock concept as well

Historically on AIM, rhetoric is far easier to sell in to, than the pending actuals post launches.

Tell you what concerns me most

The R v L stages.

I can only hope for you lot, launch means something different now, despite same start.

https://x.com/YankTrain17909/status/1946975761748897817

Very difficult to get you all to engage on topic. SO let's try another topic then

Turkeys?

The lads were just making a big database of similar lines/claims. Putting all the sales together so if zenakine gets one of them, we all have an immediate expectation reference. They like numbers

A few markets with similar stuff. Main interest was price point average and known sales to-date lol

Well it's not me reporting all posts in-between my posts. For sure. I screenshot them all anyway if anyone ever needs a recap.

Im just perplexed given the deal with CRDA how the outlooks can be so divergent.

An interesting reflection on Volume increases and negative pricing. When asked by funds about outlook, they said 'visibility is short, circa 4 weeks' macro uncertain and Q2 numbers may be down on Q1.

Consumer confidence is a big part of the fund and croda monitoring, which are run live throughout quarters on some screens albeit a lot use different measures. Some a slight improvement but many weighting outlooks, negative.

Yet somehow here? Can see many quarters ahead (on BB's), everything is looking good, and the medium to long term future is clear.

How?

Interesting to note at CRDA Q1 report on volume:negative pricing, that they only really have a visibility of circa 4 weeks on order book, macro uncertain and Q2 may well be down on Q1.

Here? Somehow seeing years ahead, Quarters assured amazing (on BB's anyway),and so on.

Do you know what i think is best? I'm going to transfer you all to those who have been working in the dark for many years.

GLA

So i suppose that brings us back to IM's, RNS's, and historic cash flows rel to revenues/costs/financing activities

When you boil it down to those..it does seem to have a wholly different context.

So if that is a wholly different context, why is there 24/7 different contacts and 24/7 multi-media guarding of those contexts?

It all stink s a bit

In that for me was a big lesson. They can basically say anything in podcasts etc, to a degree anyway. And anything at all via conduits.

I just need to ask one question today

Have they moved on rapidly from section 89 infringements?

I asked a pro on the subject and they said the difference between timing manipulation of information, and recklessness given a cash raise in-between is this. ' It depends on where it is said. A podcast? An investor meet? They carry different weights. Example, all participants are entitled to have expected full due diligence on investor meet information. The law generally accepts no excuses in that context. Assumptions etc, are not something that can be used, as it should have all being clarified prior, or said nothing.

A podcast or hairy biker article? Well, only idiots take weight from those anyway so no point in talking about that.

We need to consider this. The good cop bad cop scenario. The points of divergence and realignment

It is an art in itself.

However, sometimes they do not realise, they create an empathy, from industrial scale onlookers lol

I was just informed of coordinated article attacks, which imo, means everything positive is coordinated as well really

Dear oh dear

Thought I was on a different platform. My bad.

I'm a bit concerned that when one writes ' i have written to X' we all actually believe it and so do nothing.

Let's test the theory

The FCA etc may be busy due to the state of AIM. Has anybody contacted the SFO ?