RE: Samsung24 May 2018 08:42
I agree GB2, sadly , as I to hoped we would see the project to fruition over the next couple of years , resulting in a substantially higher SP,particularly if no new funds were needed.The inability to appoint a suitable CEO ( after almost 6 months) & the production glitch may have focused Kens attention on his limitations & their limitations to be come a truly global company without the assistance of a company already operating in that space.Being part of a large ,well known global company could also help speed up the signing of other OEMs ,in all of our target sectors , as they will be reassured by our being a division of a global organisation.Your figure of 21p is purely conjecture but if that happened it would give all shareholders a very decent return , if not as spectacular as our widest dreams may have hoped for & it would facilitate Kens ideal of the SEE workforce being well looked after.I would prefer a takeover to happen a year or 2 down the line ,for a much higher exit price & assuming we are able to manage the rapid expansion expected, but I suspect we may not get the opportunity.As ever -only time will tell.